![]() |
Not a single All-Pro - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Not a single All-Pro (/thread-34450.html) |
RE: Not a single All-Pro - Bengal Dude - 01-14-2023 (01-14-2023, 03:18 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Yeah, that’s wild. Even PFF - who loves them some Jonah - has him at 61.2 for the season. Sam Monson mentioned that Jonah has been charged with allowing 12 sacks this year, by them. RE: Not a single All-Pro - sandwedge - 01-14-2023 (01-13-2023, 11:44 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: A team with no all pros has a realistic chance of winning the Super Bowl. I would rather have a team of really good players, working as a team than 1 all pro and a team of ehh players... See Tampa Bay. RE: Not a single All-Pro - pally - 01-14-2023 (01-14-2023, 03:12 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: I really want to know which writer looked at Jonah's play and thought it was All-Pro material. Voters ranked players 1, 2, 3, a third-place vote was worth 1 point. My guess is it was a writer who was trying to steer votes away from someone who could have overtaken his 1s place vote. I suspect his second place vote was equally absurb
|