(11-19-2023, 07:30 PM)Bronxbengal Wrote: The FO gets a big “F” from me on not setting this team up for success this year. 

(11-19-2023, 02:13 PM)NotBigzo Wrote: I don’t know who needs to hear this.

But an earlier draft pick isn’t going to replace our anticipated losses in this FA.

(11-19-2023, 08:26 PM)ochocincos Wrote: There's also a difference in intentionally throwing games vs losing out because the team is just that bad without Burrow.

At this point, I don't really have any playoff aspirations, and playoffs are all I really care about if I'm being honest.
So this season is a wash for me now.

I don't think this team will go winless the rest of the way out, but I wouldn't really care if they did or not.
At this point, I'm all in on thinking who I want in FA and the draft for next year, and whatever happens happens as far as this season's record.

(11-19-2023, 08:23 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: Let’s see what happens against the Steelers next week before talking about losing and tanking.  Zac Taylor once beat the Steelers with Ryan Finley at quarterback.

(11-19-2023, 08:26 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I don't think this team will go winless the rest of the way out, but I wouldn't really care if they did or not.
At this point, I'm all in on thinking who I want in FA and the draft for next year, and whatever happens happens as far as this season's record.

(11-19-2023, 01:41 PM)casear2727 Wrote: There is no need to have a divide amongst us regarding those that want to win some games and those that are ok with losing out.

I can’t speak for all of us ok with losing the rest of the games, but I can assure you that my thought process has zero to do with any indictment on Zac Taylor as some have suggested.  My outlook is 100% common sense to me.

We were not a great team with Burrow this year, the Wild Card would be difficult to attain having no tie breakers other than Buffalo.  Without Burrow we likely will not be close to being in contention.

The schedule next season is one reason why losing out can be beneficial.

Losing out offers a 4th Round schedule – we know how close the #1 & #2 seeding can be, a single loss could be the difference.  Playing the Giants instead of the Eagles could be a deciding factor.

The draft is the most important benefit of losing out. Assuming we are NOT in contention, any wins could be damaging for years to come.  One more win in 2019 and we likely do not have Burrow.

Some of have argued the draft is a “crapshoot”, which is true overall, but the higher teams draft the more likely they obtain a quality player.

Some have argued that we are not good at drafting, which is true – especially for the trenches, but we do better drafting much higher in each round.


We are currently slated to draft 18th.  We could easily jump 9 spots and possibly 11 to the #7 pick.  


Losing out puts us in contention for major impact players for the next 5 years:

The #1 TE,  Brock Boward, is he a game changer?  Do we have a hole at TE?
The #1 DT, Jer’Zhan Newton, would interior pass rush help? Do we need a Reader replacement?
The #2 WR, is Tee leaving?
A Top 5 OT, we are likely losing Jonah.


It is not just the 1st Rounders, it’s all the way down the draft.  Tee Higgins & Logan Wilson instead of Jackson Carman and Zach Carter.


Teams we could leapfrog in the draft:

Saints
Falcons
Bucs
Colts
Broncos
Chargers
Raiders
Bills
Commanders
Packers
Rams


I do appreciate those that want to win as much as possible, but this season could be the catalyst for a great run next year.  Losing Joe to the ACL was horrendous, but we got Chase and went to the Super Bowl.

(11-19-2023, 02:10 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I think we are forgetting a major issue ahead is Bengals and Cincinnati negotiations for Bengals to stay here.  5-12 will hurt those negotiations and the fan base as a whole, besides just breeding a bad culture of losing... the NFL  draft is deep enough and good enough regardless where we draft to improve your team, it is less about where you draft but how you draft that normally is the deciding factor of being a championship team, if that was not the case how can we explain the Bengals of the 90s , Browns of 2000s etc...

(11-19-2023, 02:57 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I get the value of a high pick, seeing as we needed almost every unlucky bounce we got to land Burrow in the first place.  But with that being said, if we  go 1-6 or 0-7 we have to admit the New Dey stuff may just all about Burrow.  It's not ZT, it's not about MB stepping back, it's not about MB's great great great great grandkids taking over the social media pages and so on and so forth.

So far the ZT era has had two speeds:

1. Burrow is out there and we are the best we've ever been
2. Burrow isn't out there and it's the 90s

(11-19-2023, 11:33 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So true. Btw, how many of our best picks weren't even 1st rounders?




We really haven't seen much of Zac minus Burrow since the team's been rebuilt, and it's not like we are stepping down from Burrow to average. We're stepping down from Burrow to Akili Smith. So I'd expect a 90's style performance.

(11-19-2023, 07:38 PM)QueenCity Wrote: Right like Burrow being injured for the first several games didn't put the season in jeopardy....

Only thing I'd agree on is the Front Office not getting a capable back up QB... but even then the team isn't elite enough to carry that QB IMO.

(11-19-2023, 11:58 PM)Bronxbengal Wrote: Let’s start the discussion on not having an experienced backup QB.  After than not having the depth and personnel for an effective running game and then we finally can debate if the FO attempts to fix a suspect O line was actually worth the money they paid OBJ.  Don’t get me started on Taylor’s play calling, Dukes poor evaluation of lineman and Pollacks incompetence as a coach.  The front office had plenty of time to ask these questions and address them early in the preseason and did nothing.  


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(11-19-2023, 11:53 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: This is an excellent point, Shake, but it speaks badly of the entire organization.  Why can’t the defense still play at a high level with Joe Burrow out for the year?  Other teams can retool an offense to account for an injured starting quarterback so why can’t Cincinnati?  Didn’t Nick Foles win a Super Bowl with the Eagles as a backup?

(11-20-2023, 12:10 AM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: Losing sucks.

Losing while Cleveland is the strongest team in the AFC sucks worse.

(11-19-2023, 11:58 PM)Bronxbengal Wrote: Let’s start the discussion on not having an experienced backup QB.  After than not having the depth and personnel for an effective running game and then we finally can debate if the FO attempts to fix a suspect O line was actually worth the money they paid OBJ.  Don’t get me started on Taylor’s play calling, Dukes poor evaluation of lineman and Pollacks incompetence as a coach.  The front office had plenty of time to ask these questions and address them early in the preseason and did nothing.  


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(11-19-2023, 10:01 PM)SouthernFan Wrote: Can’t say I disagree with any of your points. I definitely won’t be disappointed if we happen to lose out. That said, I absolutely can’t stomach voluntarily losing to the Stealers and letting that team possibly sneak into the playoffs because our team didn’t try to win.

(11-20-2023, 01:50 AM)casear2727 Wrote: You know I'd love to disagree with you, but you are correct in this assessment.  I think we will see how much Burrow has covered up the inadequacies of personnel and operation.