Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Appears Becton not an option - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Appears Becton not an option (/thread-40194.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


RE: Appears Becton not an option - THE PISTONS - 03-13-2025

(03-13-2025, 04:25 PM)Bengalion Wrote: Maybe they hold Volson in high regard, who knows. Zeitler's 35 but he’s played 15 or more games every season since 2015... tought we were going to give him another chance.

My guess is they don't think they have the money to give a guy $10 million.

Say we have $23 million cap space. They budget probably $5-7 million for draft picks. Another few million for injuries.

They still need a S, a Guard, probably a CB, and some then the extension talk.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-13-2025

(03-13-2025, 04:11 PM)Bengalstripes9 Wrote: That's not what I'm saying. 

It's just a red flag when a team has a young guard that is supposedly good and they would rather trade for two other older guards than keep him. 

If the young guard were any good most teams would want to keep them if they have the cap space the Bears have.

You thinking character issues or something? Not a good teammate?

As far as play on the field he wasn't the problem there, rather a strength on a sucky OL.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Bengalstripes9 - 03-13-2025

(03-13-2025, 04:57 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: You thinking character issues or something? Not a good teammate?

As far as play on the field he wasn't the problem there, rather a strength on a sucky OL.

I really don't know. Like I said, I'm just managing my expectations. If they sign him I'm certainly hoping for the best.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Southpaw Frerotte - 03-13-2025

As someone who stares at spreadsheets and numbers all day, I find it mind blowing how risk adverse the Brown family operates their salary cap. They are so afraid of dead cap, they're willing to sacrifice their image to public, goodwill with the city, and their relationships with their current and former players. The truly ironic part of this approach is they have absolutely nothing to show for it. Going back the last ten seasons, here is where the Bengals rank in terms of least dead cap:

2015: 1
2016: 2
2017: 1
2018: 3
2019: 8
2020: 14
2021: 9
2022: 3
2023: 1
2024: 1

That's some dynasty level shit. It's just unfortunate for them those results haven't translated to the field. But hey, in the instance there is another global pandemic or another Great Depression, the Bengals are going to be prime suitors for that free agent class. Until then, they'll just continue to burn bridges with their fanbase and players. Joe sent a clear message this offseason. If this is the Blackburn response, this won't go unnoticed and good luck with the lease negotiations.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - BFritz21 - 03-13-2025

Hoping we pull off the Jenkins signing and get him in.

Not betting the house on it, but hope is all Bengals fans have sometimes.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - puddycat - 03-14-2025

Am relieved about Becton. I think we have enough "big" guys who seem to be walking injury risks. Our bets at IOL have been losing at a steady clip. We need a non-sexy BJ Hill level player to take over one of the guard positons.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Tomcat - 03-14-2025

(03-13-2025, 07:23 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Hoping we pull off the Jenkins signing and get him in.

Not betting the house on it, but hope is all Bengals fans have sometimes.

 Red warns Andy that "hope is a dangerous thing" because it can drive a man insane!


RE: Appears Becton not an option - TJHoushmandzadeh's Shiny Shoes - 03-14-2025

(03-13-2025, 07:23 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Hoping we pull off the Jenkins signing and get him in.

Not betting the house on it, but hope is all Bengals fans have sometimes.

What is the delay with Jenkins?

Why hasn’t he signed with anyone (not just the Bengals) yet?

Is it his medicals given his injury history?


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-14-2025

(Yesterday, 10:06 AM)TJHoushmandzadeh Wrote: What is the delay with Jenkins?

Why hasn’t he signed with anyone (not just the Bengals) yet?

Is it his medicals given his injury history?

Good question.

I am guessing he feels he is top guard in FA left and is holding out for the money. One of the keys for the team signing him may be guaranteed money. It is extremely risky to pay an often injured player top money and guarantee a lot of it.

In time, we will find out.

It is kind of strange Becton, Jenkins, Hernandez and others are not signed yet. Maybe they are. not the slam dunk teams are looking for either. Maybe, their agents are attemting to get too. much.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Nepa - 03-14-2025

(Yesterday, 12:07 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Good question.

I am guessing he feels he is top guard in FA left and is holding out for the money. One of the keys for the team signing him may be guaranteed money. It is extremely risky to pay an often injured player top money and guarantee a lot of it.

In time, we will find out.

It is kind of strange Becton, Jenkins, Hernandez and others are not signed yet. Maybe they are. not the slam dunk teams are looking for either. Maybe, their agents are attemting to get too. much.

Giants are desperate for a guard. They went all out for Fries and lost out to the Vikings. They have their sights, I have read, on Jenkins or Becton. Others also looking for a guard, like Patriots. I'm not confident the Bengals will win a competition for whichever free agent they have eyes on for the position. 


RE: Appears Becton not an option - TJHoushmandzadeh's Shiny Shoes - 03-14-2025

(Yesterday, 12:07 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Good question.

I am guessing he feels he is top guard in FA left and is holding out for the money. One of the keys for the team signing him may be guaranteed money. It is extremely risky to pay an often injured player top money and guarantee a lot of it.

In time, we will find out.

It is kind of strange Becton, Jenkins, Hernandez and others are not signed yet. Maybe they are. not the slam dunk teams are looking for either. Maybe, their agents are attemting to get too. much.

I understand the other guys not having signed yet. Jenkins is expected to get the biggest contract of the remaining guards. He should therefore be the next domino to fall. His deal sets the table for the remaining guys. Once teams are out of the Jenkins race they will pivot to the other guys and will have the money put aside for Jenkins free to spend.

Hernandez won’t be signed yet because of injury.

But generally the longer a player waits the less money a team has to play around with. Maybe he’s waiting for a team to restructure one of their stars to free up cap space ?
My guess though is that he needs to be medically cleared first.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-14-2025

(11 hours ago)Nepa Wrote: Giants are desperate for a guard. They went all out for Fries and lost out to the Vikings. They have their sights, I have read, on Jenkins or Becton. Others also looking for a guard, like Patriots. I'm not confident the Bengals will win a competition for whichever free agent they have eyes on for the position. 

I am not confident either. If Pats want any guard, they are loaded with cap space and can outbid anyone. Giants are not loaded with cap space.

If a bidding war with Pats, we likely lose.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Luvnit2 - 03-14-2025

(11 hours ago)TJHoushmandzadeh Wrote: I understand the other guys not having signed yet. Jenkins is expected to get the biggest contract of the remaining guards. He should therefore be the next domino to fall. His deal sets the table for the remaining guys. Once teams are out of the Jenkins race they will pivot to the other guys and will have the money put aside for Jenkins free to spend.  

Hernandez won’t be signed yet because of injury.

But generally the longer a player waits the less money a team has to play around with. Maybe he’s waiting for a team to restructure one of their stars to free up cap space ?
My guess though is that he needs to be medically cleared first.

We have 20 million left in cap space. It is a myth we need restructures or new contracts NOW TO SPEND ON A FREE AGENT.


RE: Appears Becton not an option - pally - 03-14-2025

Jenkins is visiting Seattle on Monday


RE: Appears Becton not an option - BenZoo2 - 03-14-2025

(11 hours ago)pally Wrote: Jenkins is visiting Seattle on Monday

They’re going to FAFO and start Volson, ford or a rookie or two.  They keep dragging their feet on extending their own and watching the free agent dwindle away.  


RE: Appears Becton not an option - BFritz21 - 03-14-2025

(10 hours ago)BenZoo2 Wrote: They’re going to FAFO and start Volson, ford or a rookie or two.  They keep dragging their feet on extending their own and watching the free agent dwindle away.  

You'd think we had moved on from that kind of tight ass behavior but here we are...... it's the life of a Bengals fan


RE: Appears Becton not an option - BenZoo2 - 03-14-2025

(9 hours ago)BFritz21 Wrote: You'd think we had moved on from that kind of tight ass behavior but here we are...... it's the life of a Bengals fan

The cycle of futility 


RE: Appears Becton not an option - ochocincos - 03-14-2025

(03-13-2025, 05:02 PM)Southpaw Frerotte Wrote: As someone who stares at spreadsheets and numbers all day, I find it mind blowing how risk adverse the Brown family operates their salary cap.  They are so afraid of dead cap, they're willing to sacrifice their image to public, goodwill with the city, and their relationships with their current and former players.  The truly ironic part of this approach is they have absolutely nothing to show for it.  Going back the last ten seasons, here is where the Bengals rank in terms of least dead cap:

2015: 1
2016: 2
2017: 1
2018: 3
2019: 8
2020: 14
2021: 9
2022: 3
2023: 1
2024: 1

That's some dynasty level shit.  It's just unfortunate for them those results haven't translated to the field.  But hey, in the instance there is another global pandemic or another Great Depression, the Bengals are going to be prime suitors for that free agent class.  Until then, they'll just continue to burn bridges with their fanbase and players.  Joe sent a clear message this offseason.  If this is the Blackburn response, this won't go unnoticed and good luck with the lease negotiations.

Also look at their Void Year allocations for Burrow and compare that to Eagles with Hurts.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/47648/jalen-hurts

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/47594/joe-burrow

Burrow's is SOOO LOW compared to Hurts.

Bengals added the void years for, what, spreading all of $9 mill further out? Why even do more than one void year for that amount?


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 03-14-2025

(03-13-2025, 04:36 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: My guess is they don't think they have the money to give a guy $10 million.

Say we have $23 million cap space. They budget probably $5-7 million for draft picks. Another few million for injuries.

They still need a S, a Guard, probably a CB, and some then the extension talk.

That is not the cost for picks. The cap already has 51 figured in. Picks will only add to the cap to the extent they are more expensive than the guy they dispace from the roster, or are #52 & #53. 

The only pick that will potentially cost us any significant cap space is the #1, and that is a net of like $2 mil, if he displaces a vet/min type. If he allows us to waive a more costly guy (Volson, Stone, Pratt  etc) we will save. 


RE: Appears Becton not an option - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 03-14-2025

(11 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: We have 20 million left in cap space. It is a myth we need restructures or new contracts NOW TO SPEND ON A FREE AGENT.

Depends on the FA. 

Yeah, we have $20 mil. $23 if we cut Moss. 

But: 
1) Subtract $3-$4 mil for the PS 
2) Count #52 and #53 ($2+ mil) 
3) Count the cost of the #1 pick over the guy he displaces ($2 mil)
4) Count the cost of guys who are on IR (All at the moment, but that will grow). 

That is $8-$9 mil right there. And we never spend right to the cap, because the IR list will grow and we will need to sign replacements, and we will want a cushion. 

So, yeah, $20 mil for offseason figuring. But if you count what that will actually be come regular, it is more like $11-12. Or less.