Should LaFell be re-signed? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Should LaFell be re-signed? (/thread-9327.html) |
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - grampahol - 12-22-2016 No problem keeping him, but I would hope they grab a real deep threat in the draft and not just a developmental player they hope can take over.. I like Core, but I don't necessarily see him as a long term #2 solution. RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - bengalfan74 - 12-22-2016 Absolutely for the right price. He's a proven vet capable of stepping in and contributing. People talk about him disappearing but Dalton can't complete passes while he's digging the mud out of his face mask. RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 12-22-2016 (12-22-2016, 03:37 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Absolutely for the right price. He's a proven vet capable of stepping in and contributing. People talk about him disappearing but Dalton can't complete passes while he's digging the mud out of his face mask. If anything you keep him cause he is proven and as insurance and/or depth in case Core does not pan out. RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - samhain - 12-22-2016 I'd bring him back at slightly more than what he's getting now. He may not be a superstar number 2 wr, but he's a nice 3rd or 4th option behind Green, Eifert, and possibly Boyd next year. |