![]() |
AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Rival Talk (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day (/thread-9687.html) |
RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - NATI BENGALS - 01-16-2017 Refs to the rescue. Expected nothing less. Not a coincidence Roger Godell was in the stands to watch his favorite team get a little assist from the crooked refs for the W. Makes me sick to my stomach and kills my love for the NFL just a little more. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 Leveon Bell had 170 rushing yards on a 5.7 ypc average. Damn refs. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - leonardfan40 - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:19 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Too bad for Kansas City choke holding isn't a legal form of blocking. So sad. Depends what team you play for. If you're in black and gold it's obviously legal RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - rfaulk34 - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:29 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Leveon Bell had 170 rushing yards on a 5.7 ypc average. Damn refs. You're not aware that it's easier to gain yards when your linemen hold on every play? Hmm. I'd wager that even a legitimate mental midget knew that. I wonder why you weren't aware? RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:34 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: You're not aware that it's easier to gain yards when your linemen hold on every play? ![]() RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - rfaulk34 - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:38 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Damn. You confirmed it that quick. Sub-average IQ. ![]() RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:39 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Damn. You confirmed it that quick. Sub-average IQ. Bengals. Sub-average winning percentage. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - BengalB - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:28 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Refs to the rescue. Expected nothing less. Agree 100%. Quit watching the game because of it. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - rfaulk34 - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:45 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Bengals. Sub-average winning percentage. Reply = Ineffective message board trolling. Protip: Make sure your subject cares, at least a little, about your trolling attempt. *You get 0 points--remains at N00b level* On a side note; you're either not even trying, or you're really, really bad at this. If i were you, i'd claim "not trying" because your body of work implies the latter. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:54 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Reply = Ineffective message board trolling. Steelers status = winning rfaulk status = salty RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - rfaulk34 - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:57 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Steelers status = winning Either of the two choices given previously, this is way too boring. I will now leave you to lick windows in peace. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - WildCat - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:57 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Steelers status = winning i don't understand why rfaulk isn't a kentucky fan. he lives in kentucky......from what i can tell he's a UC OSU or Xavier fan. all good teams. just not winners. either way no one really likes the steelers in any way shape or form if you ARE a true fan of ANYTHING. Not chiefs not patriots not texans not anyone. the Pittsburgh Steelers are hated around the world. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 02:00 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Either of the two choices given previously, this is way too boring. I will now leave you to lick windows in peace. 6andcounting status = tucked rfaulk into bed RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - rfaulk34 - 01-16-2017 Could someone inform this tyke that i'm busy replying to other threads? I can't seem to get down to his level and make him realize how tedious he is. Thanks in advance and sorry about the headache you're about to have. I will compensate you with many rep points. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 Pass rush status = held ![]() RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - Griever - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 01:13 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: If it was Burfict, he would have been hung at the 50 yard line immediately. Then tarred and feathered. Then drawn and quartered. thats racist RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - Beaker - 01-16-2017 Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got? RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - StoneTheCrow - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 02:38 PM)Beaker Wrote: Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got? Absolutely not. The (double) standard is the (double) standard. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - 6andcounting - 01-16-2017 (01-16-2017, 02:38 PM)Beaker Wrote: Do any steeler fans think Davis should get a 4 game suspension for the blow to the head of a defenseless WR in a playoff game like Burfict got? You think a first time offender of a "blow to the head" penalty should get a 4 game suspension, because another guy got a 3 game suspension only after 9-10 previous fines for dirty play? ![]() EDIT: Beaker is correct. I looked up the word "fair" in the dictionary and the definition is "whatever Beaker thinks up and spews out on his keyboard based on his feelings for various football team." I guess his post checkouts then. RE: AFC Divisional Round: Steelers @ Chiefs Game Day - Beaker - 01-16-2017 I apologize, you are correct....a 3 game suspension would be fair, not 4. My bad. |