How does this get fixed - realistically - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: How does this get fixed - realistically (/thread-21651.html) |
RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - MEBengalsFan - 10-17-2019 (10-16-2019, 08:02 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: I dunno. Maybe they need to improve their practices at signing Free Agents. Please tell me which team in today's Free Agency era of football has won a super bowl bringing in multiple free agents? The teams that have won the SB that used the Draft are PATS, Steelers, Ravens, Seahawks, Giants, Saints, RAMS, Colts, etc... and if you state Broncos as a team that used the FA; you are mistaken as Peyton was not playing most of the year when they went to the Super Bowl because he was bench for bad play; though he did show up when his number was called and you should expect that from a pro like Peyton. Teams are not built from FA; teams are built using the draft. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - rfaulk34 - 10-17-2019 (10-16-2019, 12:36 PM)hotweales Wrote: Realistically Mike Brown is not going to step down, or fire any family! Free agency allows teams to rebound much quicker these days. If the Bengals did it right, they could be playoff contenders next year. But they won't "do it right" (my terminology for doing it my way :) ). They will stick with their plan and i don't really see a winning season next year either, doing it their way. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - rfaulk34 - 10-17-2019 (10-16-2019, 12:55 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Find new starters at the following positions (in priority order): It's going to take FA plus getting another 1st round pick and some 2 or 3's, which means trades. The Bengals have really done neither (to the extent they need to) but it would be a very nice surprise if they did since they have trended toward a more "current" FA strategy the last couple years. It would be a pretty big jump though. Bigger than the jumps they've made in the past. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - rfaulk34 - 10-17-2019 (10-16-2019, 01:27 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Bengals Management's Plan to Fix the Team: The sad/annoying/frustrating thing about the truth of the matter is; they're not going to do it anything like a fan would. I'm certain they don't think Dalton is done. I'm certain they believe that injuries have been the main cause of his performance this year. I'm certain they fully believe that with AJ and a line closer to what they envisioned this training camp--they can slant the draft towards the defense this coming year and they will be back to contenders again next year. They're not going to move Dalton one single day before his contract expires and if in any way he's able to play at a higher level, they will try again to get him at a team friendly deal (which they believe would be fair to him as well) and they're not going to deal AJ; in both cases because of the type of people they are and the fact they've helped contribute to the teams from '11-'16. I'm certain that's what they think and i'm certain that's where they're wrong. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - Catmandude123 - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 03:27 PM)MEBengalsFan Wrote: Please tell me which team in today's Free Agency era of football has won a super bowl bringing in multiple free agents? You just listed eight teams who won the SB by using free agents. You build a team with draft and supplement it with free agents from other teams. Mike Browns method of resigning aging vets to spend the needed cap money is a recipe for disaster. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - THE PISTONS - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 03:52 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: The sad/annoying/frustrating thing about the truth of the matter is; they're not going to do it anything like a fan would. Precisely. Jokes on all of us. They had virtually the same issues with the roster last year that they didn't address. Now due to an inept coaching staff, there are more issues this year. Honestly, too many issues to address in 1 offseason even by a good GM. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - THE PISTONS - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 03:56 PM)Catmandude123 Wrote: You just listed eight teams who won the SB by using free agents. You build a team with draft and supplement it with free agents from other teams. Mike Browns method of resigning aging vets to spend the needed cap money is a recipe for disaster. By supplementing by free agency...I'd say more adequately filling holes. But, yes. You need to draft good in the NFL. AND...we have the smallest scouting staff in the league! So...uh yeah...Is the draft our thing? Are our scouts 2 to 3x better than the Patriots scouts? RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - J24 - 10-17-2019 1.) Trade anybody who you don't think will be on the team next season or have any interest to be on the team next season. 2.) Trade Andy if plan is too bring in new QB next off-season. 3.) Clean house there at least 7 players that need the axe 4.) Sign actual first day free Agents 5.) Trade top 3 pick for multiple first & second day picks if can RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - BengalsRocker - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 03:56 PM)Catmandude123 Wrote: You just listed eight teams who won the SB by using free agents. You build a team with draft and supplement it with free agents from other teams. Mike Browns method of resigning aging vets to spend the needed cap money is a recipe for disaster. Exactly. It's a mix of both. Damn people are stubborn. You don't write off Free Agency just because you've whiffed. Just as you accept that all draft picks even the top ones don't always pan out. How many frickin' years are we gonna watch a lazy front office re-sign guys for too much and grab guys that aren't even playing NFL football. It's not like they're breaking the bank on big name Free Agents year in and out. Make a splash. Sign one or two guys that can make immediate positive impacts. Instead we get guys to try to replace holes and sometimes are worse than their predecessors. If people can't see signing Free Agents(especially with a brand new coach who wants to revamp the team)... I think you need help! RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - BengalsRocker - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 04:34 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: By supplementing by free agency...I'd say more adequately filling holes. But, yes. You need to draft good in the NFL. Yes both. It's so obvious but everyone thinks we're gonna be the damn Redskins with signing crazy Free Agents. It's that over-the-top logic of dismissing Free Agency that pisses me off. I don't think I could even discuss football with someone who thinks it's an albatross for a team. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - rfaulk34 - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 04:33 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Precisely. Jokes on all of us. I don't think they have too many issues if they did it the right way. With their way, yes, too many issues. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - THE PISTONS - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 06:55 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: Yes both. Some people justify whatever the Bengals do...just like the Sample pick. IF we signed a ton of free agents, they'd talk about how that's the best way to go. It's a hard pill to swallow admitting that the team you follow is inept with little hope to improve. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - THE PISTONS - 10-17-2019 (10-17-2019, 10:04 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I don't think they have too many issues if they did it the right way. With their way, yes, too many issues. IF IF IF they hired several more capable scouts and put a decision making structure in place where a qualified GM made the calls...they could fix this thing in maybe 2 years. They could probably be 8-8 next year IF they had a great draft and signed 2-3 free agent upgrades. Then, have another great draft and add a couple more free agents and playoffs. They of course won't do this. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - rfaulk34 - 10-18-2019 (10-17-2019, 11:23 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: IF IF IF they hired several more capable scouts and put a decision making structure in place where a qualified GM made the calls...they could fix this thing in maybe 2 years. They could probably be 8-8 next year IF they had a great draft and signed 2-3 free agent upgrades. True, they won't do it but the NFL structure--FA, high draft picks every round for teams with the worst record the year before--allows teams to turn it around quicker. (Here they come...) IF Jonah is healthy and at least average, IF they sign a guy like Conklin they could shore up the other T spot, IF they trade, and/or deal on draft day, they could get 2 1st round picks--say, QB and the OG from GA--or, if they play Finley and he proves to be capable, IF they sign a guy like Littleton and draft another LB high in rd2, IF they trim the fat (bad contracts) and sign the right FA currently on the team, IF they hit on the draft with those high picks in each round, IF they're healthy next year... Etc, etc. There is a way to imrove the team substantially, next year. But it's a way the Bengals don't/haven't ascribed to in the past. Then there still remains the issue of the Oline coach, D coordinator and lack of O coordinator (Callahan, Gruden and a breathing stack of DNA that is an experienced D coordinator will/should be out there)...holey sheet, that's a lot of "IFs". There is a way to do it, for an organization that has employees with half a brain, a willingness and a want to actually be a playoff quality team. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - BengalsRocker - 10-18-2019 (10-18-2019, 01:18 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: True, they won't do it but the NFL structure--FA, high draft picks every round for teams with the worst record the year before--allows teams to turn it around quicker. So what you're really saying is with health, luck, and a competent front office it's possible? Yikes! RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - TJHoushmandzadeh's Shiny Shoes - 10-18-2019 (10-17-2019, 11:21 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Some people justify whatever the Bengals do...just like the Sample pick. This is good point. Those people are just the other side of the coin to those who criticize whatever the Bengals do. If Patriots signed someone cheap, they'd talk about how it was a bargain but if the Bengals signed them then it would be the Bengals being cheap. If another team signs someone for a lot of money they'd talk about how that's good teams do it, but if the Bengals sign someone for a lot of money then it's just the Bengals overpaying. Their view point - whether it is homer or hater - depends entirely upon the team making the move. Give me those who can see both light and shade every time. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - BengalsRocker - 10-18-2019 I just want to know who in the world thought signing Hart to his contract was smart? Yet Blackburn made an ass out of himself justifying it. That speaks volumes to me about this franchise. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - Wyche'sWarrior - 10-18-2019 (10-18-2019, 09:18 AM)BengalsRocker Wrote: I just want to know who in the world thought signing Hart to his contract was smart? Signing Hart for insurance wasn't too bad of a move, bidding against themselves was a bad move. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - THE PISTONS - 10-18-2019 (10-18-2019, 01:18 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: True, they won't do it but the NFL structure--FA, high draft picks every round for teams with the worst record the year before--allows teams to turn it around quicker. Absolutely. But, teams like the Dolphins with A LOT of draft picks and a projected $100 million of cap space will be the active ones. Just watch. The sad thing is we had some $50 million of cap space this past offseason, and arguably did very little when you look at what performances the guys we signed give us. RE: How does this get fixed - realistically - SHRacerX - 10-18-2019 (10-16-2019, 01:27 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Bengals Management's Plan to Fix the Team: I think since this is the most realistic approach, we shouldn't hope or plan for a total overhaul but take this and try to tweak it. Here's my try: Draft- Trade first round pick for more picks. They don't all have to be this year. We should certainly end up in the top 3, and if Miami and Washington somehow both finish worse than the Bengals that is where we end up. Realistically, I see us drafting 2nd. You should get at least TWO first rounders and more for that spot. We need a LOT of high draft picks. One player won't transform this team. Coaching- Yes, another year should be better, but if there is no improvement through the year on defense then they might need to go in a different direction. Alex Grinch has transformed Oklahoma from sieve to solid defense in one year. He is an Ohio native and is young, innovative, and aggressive. I would hire him tomorrow as DC. I would similarly get rid of Jim Turner. Looks like a toxic asshole and we don't need any of that. ZT will improve when his talent improves. His line is bad to start and now half are gone injured. I give him more chances. Health is unpredictable, but depth is controllable. The back end of the roster needs more young players to develop, not re-treads that are done. Free Agency- Here is where you make the biggest change. If you are going to clearly move on from Dalton after next year (maybe next year if someone is desperate for a QB, but unlikely) then you will have the cap space to pay some big name, higher dollar FA. I would avoid the drama of a me, me, me player like OBJ, but some big name defensive players at LB and Defensive line or safety would go a long way to raising the standard of play, getting the fans excited, and showing the NFL you mean business. You might have to overpay, but we made that bed and we have to sleep in it. So, in summary, trade first pick for more picks. Get Alex Grinch as DC and pay him a lot. Fire Jim Turner. Go young at the back end of the roster and try to develop. Get 3-4 top-tier FA before next year. My desired position groups to target in order of preference would be: LB, S, Defensive End, Offensive line. |