Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue (/thread-35873.html) |
RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023 Haha, just sitting here waiting for someone to include Roy Buchanan or Rory Gallagher into the discussion, or even Johnny Winter. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023 (07-04-2023, 04:17 PM)Whatever Wrote: Definitely, but Edge as least has chord/position changes in his parts. Most of Gilmour's performance in "Give Blood" is sitting in a single position and repeating the same simple pattern ad nauseam with no deviation. And his solo is just a slow walk up of a major scale. I mean, that's just a classic example of a guy using effects as a crutch instead of a tool. Most people who do not play have no idea when a delay is being used. They actually think the player is picking all those notes. It's part f the magic.... RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Hyksos70 - 07-05-2023 (06-30-2023, 08:23 AM)Sled21 Wrote: My very first rock concert was Robert, Jimmy, John Paul and Bonzo at the Riverfront Coliseum in 1977 (2nd night). The thing I never really got with Zeppelin (my favorite) is Page and Plant got all the attention, Bonzo was pretty much worshipped by drummers everywhere when he died. Plant was Knighted. But, listen to any Zeppelin song and it is plain they are all driven by Jones' bass or organ, not Page's guitar. I (And, he did all the arrangements) In fact, when Page was in his heavy heroin days, his playing became very sloppy. Yet, Jones is the least recognized of the band. Damn also saw them in 77, and i agree 100% with you JPJ was the force behind Led Zeppelin. Funny I also feel Queen's John Deacon was also the hidden weapon of the band. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Garrus - 07-05-2023 (07-02-2023, 01:04 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: ... It boggles my mind how anyone could detest Pink Floyd. To each their own and all that I guess. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - michaelsean - 07-05-2023 This breaking down at who is the best at this and that is irrelevant to most people like me. It's the end product, and I really like Zeppelin. I like Pink Floyd. I love the Stones. The Who for me has always been OK. Not because I think they don't have talent, but because I don't like their songs as much. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 03:21 AM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Haha, just sitting here waiting for someone to include Roy Buchanan or Rory Gallagher into the discussion, or even Johnny Winter. Love me some Johnny Winter. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-05-2023 (07-02-2023, 01:04 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: ... We are not cool anymore.... RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-05-2023 (07-04-2023, 07:25 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: As a string plucker myself, i'm gonna have to disagree with you there. The brilliance of some players is how they take something simple and make it sound more complex and/or different than your average joe guitar player. No one hit that wah pedal like Earl Hooker. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 10:44 AM)Wyche Wrote: Love me some Johnny Winter. Edgar was better.... RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 10:57 AM)WychesWarrior Wrote: No one hit that way pedal like Earl Hooker. Ever listen to Magic Sam? RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - t3r3e3 - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 11:06 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Edgar was better.... I imagine you like Mr. Pibb more than Dr. Pepper? RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - WeezyBengal - 07-05-2023 Tickets were reselling for so much because Cincy was her only concert in the entire REGION. Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana didn't get any other concerts. The two in Cincy were it. Supply and demand. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 07-05-2023 (07-04-2023, 04:17 PM)Whatever Wrote: Definitely, but Edge as least has chord/position changes in his parts. Most of Gilmour's performance in "Give Blood" is sitting in a single position and repeating the same simple pattern ad nauseam with no deviation. And his solo is just a slow walk up of a major scale. I mean, that's just a classic example of a guy using effects as a crutch instead of a tool. Eh, have to disagree with some of what you say here Whatever. Gilmour is so clean and that is what makes his playing so special. I understand he isn't a speedy guitarist and the slow walk up of a major scale reference, but that is just his style. Nothing wrong with it. I still think he is the best at what he does and makes me close my eyes and just listen unlike any other guitarist. David can make a guitar speak without the tube like Frampton and others use. Dude is special at what he does IMO. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Sled21 - 07-05-2023 And then there's Clapton, who may well be the best of them all.... RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 11:07 AM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Ever listen to Magic Sam? Hell yes! Love his music. West Side Soul is a seminal work. Such a shame he died so young. Freddie King is my favorite though. Have you seen the footage of Sam shredding on Earl's guitar from a concert in Germany? (I think it was in Germany) RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-05-2023 (07-05-2023, 11:06 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Edgar was better.... No way man..... RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - bfine32 - 07-05-2023 I'm not a "guitar snob" so I gotta say Jimi Hendrix is the best I've heard in my lifetime. We used to listen to his Star Spangled Banner in the lockerroom before we took the mat. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Truck_1_0_1_ - 07-06-2023 (07-05-2023, 09:40 AM)Garrus Wrote: It boggles my mind how anyone could detest Pink Floyd. To each their own and all that I guess. (07-05-2023, 10:48 AM)WychesWarrior Wrote: We are not cool anymore.... Have them playing in your ear 24/7 as you are discovering and refining your music tastes and you'll get sick of them just like I did Stuff that is overplayed I really am not a fan of, at all. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-06-2023 (07-06-2023, 09:25 AM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: I hear you, I don't listen to much of the overplayed stuff either.... except for Time. That might be my favorite song ever. I like listening to Animals and Meddle quite a bit, Gilmour's solo stuff, and some of the deeper cuts off the more popular albums. I've listened to a lot of Pink Floyd in my time too, but I still really dig them. RE: Taylor Swift=Bengals revenue - Whatever - 07-06-2023 (07-05-2023, 02:59 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Eh, have to disagree with some of what you say here Whatever. Gilmour is so clean and that is what makes his playing so special. I expect him to play really clean when most of his parts are relatively simple and when you look into his rig, he has noise suppression in almost every link of his signal chain. His parts fit well in in Pink Floyd 's songs and style, but so did Johnny Ramone's in The Ramones and I wouldn't hold him way up there, either(and I like a lot of The Ramones stuff). A guy doesn't necessarily have to be ultra fast to be great, IMO. I can appreciate a lot of different attributes, from Bob Weir's insane knowledge of chord inversions, to the crazy stretches Andy Summers pulls off, to the bends Stevie Ray Vaughan could do while using very heavy gauge strings. But playing routine parts cleanly with virtually every noise cancelling trick in the book isn't one of them. |