Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. (/thread-4632.html) |
RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:40 AM)tlotharw Wrote: Hill doesn't owe Burfict anthing. Hill owes the city of Cincinnati everything. The only thing that gave the Steelers a chance to win at that point was having the ball. That's the only way to score points. And Jeremy Hill came through for them. Steelers were going to get the ball back unless we get a first down even if Jeremy does not fumble. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:43 AM)tlotharw Wrote: You don't get a first down by fumbling. Hill understands football like you do. So you also think we could have ran out the clock without getting a first down? Keep proving what the extent of your football knowledge, tlotharw. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - tlotharw - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:44 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Steelers were going to get the ball back unless we get a first down even if Jeremy does not fumble. You don't get a first down by fumbling. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:47 AM)tlotharw Wrote: You don't get a first down by fumbling. What is your point? Do you think a team gets a first down by gaining 4 yards on first down? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - tlotharw - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:48 AM)fredtoast Wrote: What is your point? Your point seems to be is that it is better that the Steelers have the ball instead of us. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:51 AM)tlotharw Wrote: Your point seems to be is that it is better that the Steelers have the ball instead of us. And you don't seem to be able to read and understand simple English. Please post a link to me saying anything like that. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - tlotharw - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:04 AM)fredtoast Wrote: And you don't seem to be able to read and understand simple English. Case dismissed. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Millhouse - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:47 AM)tlotharw Wrote: You don't get a first down by fumbling. If Hill didnt fumble, the odds go up to win. But since we have no idea what would have happened on that 2nd or maybe 3rd down or maybe that fg attempt afterwards, it didnt guarantee the loss. Especially against a qb with a very bum shoulder at that point of the game. However since this is the Bengals, Hill couldve held onto the ball but not get the first down 2 plays later resulting in a fg. Then Brown returns it down to like the 35 yard line of the Bengals, and they end up scoring a TD anyways. Or Nuge's kick gets blocked and they return it for a td. Trying to think of other perfect Bengallike endings.. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Fresno B - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 12:49 AM)fredtoast Wrote: How did that running down the tunnel like the game was over work out for Burfict? It didn't affect the team at all. Did Hills fumble? Burfict and both AJs should be hero's. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Fresno B - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 01:51 AM)tlotharw Wrote: Your point seems to be is that it is better that the Steelers have the ball instead of us. Agreed. Guy is a creep. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:10 AM)tlotharw Wrote: Case dismissed. Thank you for dismissing your case and admitting defeat. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Atomic Orange - 01-13-2016 "This loss in on me" - Jeremy Hill And I agree with him. By all means though keep fighting.. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:16 AM)Fresno B Wrote: Agreed. Guy is a creep. Okay, if you agree then I challenge you to post a link to me saying anything like that. Tlorthrawlow was smart enough to admit defeat. Are you? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:15 AM)Fresno B Wrote: It didn't affect the team at all. So, in other words the exact same effect that Hill's dancing had. So why all the crying about Hill's dancing when it had exactly the same effect as Burfits running through the tunnel? And why claim that Karma burned Hill for dancing but not Burfict for acting a fool? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:15 AM)Fresno B Wrote: It didn't affect the team at all. Did Hills fumble? Burfict and both AJs should be hero's. How did Burfict's penalty affect the team? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Fresno B - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:31 AM)fredtoast Wrote: How did Burfict's penalty affect the team? Burfict had no business on the field as far as I'm concerned. Anything after the fumble is moot to this diehard. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:41 AM)Fresno B Wrote: Burfict had no business on the field as far as I'm concerned. Anything after the fumble is moot to this diehard. So if we kick a FG with a minute left you don't put the defense back on the field? That strategy backfired on us in the Arizona game this year. I don't think we should try it again. RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - Fresno B - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 02:44 AM)fredtoast Wrote: So if we kick a FG with a minute left you don't put the defense back on the field? Are you justifying the loss? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - fredtoast - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 03:06 AM)Fresno B Wrote: Are you justifying the loss? Can you understand simple English? RE: Hill Owes Burfict Dinner. - rfaulk34 - 01-13-2016 (01-12-2016, 04:11 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Okay then, let me ask a simple question. It makes a difference when the offense has the ball with <2 minutes left and they hand the ball right back to the defense on first down. I'd say the blame is equal. Like players always say, "win together, lose together". Neither side of the ball made a play to win the game and they both made a play to help lose it. |