(09-29-2016, 05:27 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Yup.  Thats going to be some BS if you get both of them this week and I get neither.  Either push it through today, or hold off until monday if not possible.  Guess I should have thought about that.

Realistically I think its a fair trade.  I have other backs performing well and need some help at WR.

(09-29-2016, 05:38 PM)CageTheBengal Wrote: I gotta give the nod to Urinal I think he got the better deal.

Freeman and Coleman both have looked good splitting carries and I think Urinal just capitalized on a great week by Freeman largely because he was playing one of the worst defenses in football. Landry is a PPR machine and by far the best weapon Miami has so I think he will be more consistent.

(09-29-2016, 05:38 PM)CageTheBengal Wrote: I gotta give the nod to Urinal I think he got the better deal.

Freeman and Coleman both have looked good splitting carries and I think Urinal just capitalized on a great week by Freeman largely because he was playing one of the worst defenses in football. Landry is a PPR machine and by far the best weapon Miami has so I think he will be more consistent.

(09-29-2016, 05:52 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Also, I found the other half of your phallus that you broke off inside me last week.  Assuming that was just a tip for good service.

(09-29-2016, 05:21 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Coleman keeps vulchuring all his TD's.  Coleman had 3 last week  

(09-29-2016, 05:27 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Realistically I think its a fair trade.  I have other backs performing well and need some help at WR.

(09-29-2016, 05:38 PM)CageTheBengal Wrote: I gotta give the nod to Urinal I think he got the better deal.

Freeman and Coleman both have looked good splitting carries and I think Urinal just capitalized on a great week by Freeman largely because he was playing one of the worst defenses in football. Landry is a PPR machine and by far the best weapon Miami has so I think he will be more consistent.

(09-29-2016, 06:03 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: I'm just hoping they start letting Freeman get back to being the guy.  He's clearly a lot better player.  Coleman is only averaging 3.4 yards a carry, while Freeman is averaging 6.3.  Almost double.  He's way better in the pass game too.  I don't get why they have a near split in carries.

It's a risky move for me, for sure.  But man is my back situation messed up:  Lacy, so far disappointing, and on a bye. Langford, been terrible, and now hurt for 3-4 weeks.  Arian Foster, made of glass, shown nothing.  Derrick Henry, waiting behind Demarco Murray.  Sproles on a bye.

Landy is super solid though.  Even his bad game usually result in 10+ points.  Landy has been better than his 3-4 grade, while Freeman has been worse than his 1-2 round grade.  Seems really fair.  I'm actually kinda shocked it worked out so easily.

(09-29-2016, 06:12 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Yeah but Freeman is in the NFCS, so that means facing the Bucs and Saints defenses multiple times. The TD vulturing is a big concern, but isn't Freeman still getting the majority of touches? And don't forget that Freeman had 73 catches last year and like 9-10 catches this year. That greatly helps his value in a PPR.

If Freeman picks up his TD pace, I think toast wins. If not, maybe urinal gets the better of it. Pretty fair overall now that I've really thought about it though.

(09-29-2016, 07:32 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: I changed the trade rejection option to "none", to see if your trade could go through.  I didn't even see an option for swapping your players manually. It might be there, but I don't get the full site on my cell phone and I'm not at home to hop on a computer.

Apologies in advance if anyone is upset that I changed the trade rejection rules...it's a special circumstance for two special people, and I'll change it back tomorrow.  Nothing looked very unfair, and I don't think anyone else would think so.  

...really though, I don't even know if it'll work. It might still take a couple of days to process.

(09-29-2016, 07:39 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: awww.  stop it.

looks like its set to go through mon since landry plays tonight.  hopefully neither of these 2 get hurt while on the other players team.

(09-29-2016, 07:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The trade is complete. Only because I saw that is what the Commish deemed. I told Toast I wasn't going to expedite. 

(09-29-2016, 07:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The trade is complete. Only because I saw that is what the Commish deemed. I told Toast I wasn't going to expedite. 

(09-29-2016, 07:50 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: My bad, dude. I wasn't trying to overstep here. I didn't see a message against it, so I thought it'd be all good.

I will resign due to my abuse of executive powers if needed.

(09-29-2016, 08:04 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, I think you can stay as Commish. It was a PM then I logged on here and saw all were in favor. One of the only folks that could have possibly been upset was me as I play Vas, Rager is the only other person that it effects this week

(09-29-2016, 08:22 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Hey, is the current review period built in for members to vote on the trade, or is it just built in to give the commish time to look at it?  I'm just curious, cuz I don't really know if I should be looking at it.

Just my 2 cents.  In my main league, and another money league, we eventually changed it to where only the commish has control over whether to veto a trade, and that's only to be done when it's obviously unfair.  The league vote was to hard to get everyone to vote on and  in a few cases lead to some pretty big arguments. Ex: 1 person is playing a team that week and vetoes the trade just because of that and not because it's unfair.

(09-29-2016, 08:14 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Hey, I'm in the camp of "you drafted them, you are stuck with them".  If someone wants to upgrade their roster, use the scrap heap...

(09-29-2016, 06:39 PM)CageTheBengal Wrote: Just out of curiousity would you have traded Landry for McCoy?