Watson will play against Bengals - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Watson will play against Bengals (/thread-32690.html) |
RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:33 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: I just find it very interesting that the judge called his behavior “egregious” but hands down such a soft punishment with NO FINES. Non-violent, but his actions sent at least one woman out of the room in tears, and forced her to quit the business all together. The emotional and psychological damage he did was just as bad. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Synric - 08-01-2022 It is what it is. We all knew a minimum punishment would happen. The weirdest thing about this whole situation is the judge practically implied guilt by suggesting he get massages only from club personnel. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:36 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I don't know that people are really defending Watson. Umm…Fred is pulling his typical argue over anything crap, and the edgelord literally doesn’t believe the women are telling the truth. There’s absolutely people defending him here. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Frank Booth - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:52 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Umm…Fred is pulling his typical argue over anything crap, and the edgelord literally doesn’t believe the women are telling the truth. There’s absolutely people defending him here. Now where did I say I didn’t believe these women? That’s libel. You’re being over emotional and irrational once again RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Bengalion - 08-01-2022 Where's Burfict when we need him? Our d-line players should target this clown, make him pay. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:26 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: No no no we’re all scumbags who don’t believe women, including the jury. Get with the program (08-01-2022, 12:54 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Now where did I say I didn’t believe these women? Can you not even keep up with your own bullshit? RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 09:47 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I hope the NFL files an appeal. (08-01-2022, 09:49 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: What an absolute joke. Brady got almost that for deflating some ***** footballs. So true. This guy should of been suspended for the season at the very least. He be a little sick in the head. Brady shown after deflate gate that the balls never mattered on how inflated they were. Dude is just great and got punished for it, this Watson dude is disgusting and feminists should be freaking out right now. Too bad they don't care about women when it doesn't suit an agenda. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:56 PM)Bengalion Wrote: Where's Burfict when we need him? Our d-line players should target this clown, make him pay. I wish I believed in Karma. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:57 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I wish I believed in Karma. Believe, it can happen Nicomo lol RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Soonerpeace - 08-01-2022 Robinson was a female former federal judge. She’s an arbitrator. She ruled 6 games. If they couldn’t prove or none of the girls testified he forced himself physically I can see the punishment. Do I think it sucks ? Yes. I’ve come 180 on this. I think it’s the Browns who are lame giving up so much for saying ch a loser RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Rubekahn29 - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:50 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Non-violent, but his actions sent at least one woman out of the room in tears, and forced her to quit the business all together. The emotional and psychological damage he did was just as bad. Oh I’m not defending. Matter of fact, the fact that she said that makes me question her thought process. Created trauma does not have to be violent to hurt someone RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Frank Booth - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:56 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Can you not even keep up with your own bullshit? Can you even read? Do I really have to argue with you? I wanna say you’re joking but I highly doubt that knowing how you operate RE: Watson will play against Bengals - BobJones4980 - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:52 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Umm…Fred is pulling his typical argue over anything crap, and the edgelord literally doesn’t believe the women are telling the truth. There’s absolutely people defending him here. Imagine bending over backwards to defend a multimillionaire with 24+ accusations. This dude literally just had a ruling basically saying he could only get massages from the teams massage therapist. Crazy to think someone can be so braindead that they believe all these women got together to take down Watson rather than the possibility Watson did anything wrong. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 01:00 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Can you even read? Do I really have to argue with you? I hope you step on a Lego. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 01:00 PM)BobJones4980 Wrote: Imagine bending over backwards to defend a multimillionaire with 24+ accusations. It’s ***** gross, isn’t it? People are the absolute worst. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Mike M (the other one) - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 10:22 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Yes - I agree. He won't appeal it. That would be the dumbest move he could make. Goodell could suspend him for a year and then he's stuck with that decision. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - THE PISTONS - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:59 PM)Soonerpeace Wrote: Robinson was a female former federal judge. She’s an arbitrator. She ruled 6 games. If they couldn’t prove or none of the girls testified he forced himself physically I can see the punishment. Do I think it sucks ? Yes. I’ve come 180 on this. I think it’s the Browns who are lame giving up so much for saying ch a loser It's what you say...plus what is in the conduct policy. What I think the board is having trouble with is that specifications get written into a conduct policy. If this happens, then this is the punishment. These particular incidents, while we think they're despicable...they don't fall clearly under the conduct policy. That's why the NFL could only bring 4-5 women in and not the full 30+. This sucks. He basically fell within a loophole of the wording. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - THE PISTONS - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 01:08 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: He won't appeal it. No. The NFL can appeal the decision. And it goes to Goodell to decide. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - THE PISTONS - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 12:41 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: So you’re saying Pittsburgh is a more moral organization than Cleveland…. I think Pittsburgh could see the big picture. That Roethlisberger needed help. I think Cleveland sold their soul to the devil to upgrade over Mayfield. RE: Watson will play against Bengals - Nicomo Cosca - 08-01-2022 (08-01-2022, 01:11 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I think Pittsburgh could see the big picture. That Roethlisberger needed help. They got their “adult at QB” alright. |