![]() |
Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Rival Talk (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all (/thread-4574.html) |
RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 12:08 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: The Burfict fear is rampant in here and other forums. I thought the Steelers had the tough fan base, but all I see is a bunch of fellas with their panties in a bunch and a fear Burfict will paint someone in subsequent games. LOL, fear. Someone who runs like a ***** when they get owned accuses others of being scured. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-12-2016 Well before Taze finally had enough..... http://imgur.com/gallery/1y9ER RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Aquapod770 - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 12:44 PM)Wyche Wrote: Well before Taze finally had enough..... That's just good clean Steelers football though ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Rotobeast - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 12:10 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: So now Burfict is going to put his poo poo on someones pee pee with his bum bum..... I cannot believe that you flipping the script and making it appear as if I were the one asking to try that. Everyone knows your a bottom twink. Not that there's anything wrong with that. ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 02:40 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: I cannot believe that you flipping the script and making it appear as if I were the one asking to try that. I literally have no idea what any of those words mean in you second sentence. The fact that you do speaks volumes Mr. Poo Poo, Pee Pee, Bum Bum. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 12:44 PM)Wyche Wrote: Well before Taze finally had enough..... (01-12-2016, 01:59 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: That's just good clean Steelers football though Something wrong with finishing blocks? Maybe "Taze" (LOL...what a lilly nickname) needs to be coached on how to not hold onto a lineman and get off blocks. Bah...Hes only average though so he probably won't learn. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - michaelsean - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 02:45 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Something wrong with finishing blocks? Maybe "Taze" (LOL...what a lilly nickname) needs to be coached on how to not hold onto a lineman and get off blocks. Bah...Hes only average though so he probably won't learn. No that's illegal once he's on the ground. So was the take down. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - rfaulk34 - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 08:40 AM)GMDino Wrote: So what you're saying is, pimp daddy retired as a Steelers. ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - rfaulk34 - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 11:49 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You're partially correct, but Burfict has exactly what you described and a little something extra. That something extra is a desire to actually injure his opponents any way possible. I used this comparison after our last game; Greg Lloyd played with the intensity and passion you describe above. He was feared and respected and he was not thought of as a player who deliberately attempted to injure his opponents. Contrast that with Andre Waters from the exact same era who was thought of exactly as Burfict is now and for the same reasons. While I agree the era contributes to Burfict's reputation it's not wholly, or even largely, responsible. Burfict has the rep he deserves and he's going to have to work really hard to overcome it. Sadly, for your team, that doesn't seem to be a likely outcome. QFT RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - GMDino - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 02:57 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: So what you're saying is, pimp daddy retired as a Steelers. What I am saying is when he goes into the HOF he'll go as 49er. ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 02:47 PM)michaelsean Wrote: No that's illegal once he's on the ground. So was the take down. I keep forgetting...Maybe you can help. Are we in the Smack Forum or Around the NFL? RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - michaelsean - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 03:08 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: I keep forgetting...Maybe you can help. Are we in the Smack Forum or Around the NFL? I thought the smack had to actually be based on reality. Bengals have 6 Lombardis and Steelers have zero. Six baby. Both my thumbs have a damn ring. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 03:16 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I thought the smack had to actually be based on reality. That's because you're talking about butt rings. Also it is reality that Burfict just wouldn't let go. Sound's like holding to me. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - michaelsean - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 03:30 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: That's because you're talking about butt rings. a ring's a ring. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Rotobeast - 01-12-2016 (01-12-2016, 02:43 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: I literally have no idea what any of those words mean in you second sentence. The fact that you do speaks volumes Mr. Poo Poo, Pee Pee, Bum Bum. Sure ya don't..... No need to keep the innocent and dominated act rolling into the forums. You are off your leash. ![]() ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-13-2016 (01-11-2016, 12:50 PM)Vlad Wrote: A knee shot to the shoulder. Pig Pen says you're wrong.....AGAIN.....but this is nothing new for you, now is it? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25448089/ben-roethlisberger-vontaze-burficts-sack-was-not-a-dirty-hit RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 05:45 PM)Wyche Wrote: Pig Pen says you're wrong.....AGAIN.....but this is nothing new for you, now is it? Pig-Pen....LOL So lame. RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Wyche'sWarrior - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 05:56 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Pig-Pen....LOL So lame. ....how about ***k face.....or ****head......Water Head......or Little Jen....or Shit for brains......any of those suit ya? RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - SteelCitySouth - 01-13-2016 (01-13-2016, 06:08 PM)Wyche Wrote: ....how about ***k face.....or ****head......Water Head......or Little Jen....or Shit for brains......any of those suit ya? Sure. D**K Sucker. ![]() RE: Burfict hit on Ben not so clean after all - Bengalzona - 01-13-2016 The hit on Big Ben (a.k.a. Pig Pen) was perfectly legal. If it wasn't called foul by the refs, it was perfectly legal... as every Steeler fan knows. ![]() |