(05-27-2016, 12:30 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, I'm not bothering to read the rest of the thread. I just have to laugh at the whole "you only see one side crying about it" after Bell makes his comments. Years, YEARS, we have heard Bengals players and fans boohooing about the physical play. I'm not defending anyone complaining about it because it's how it is, but that is some seriously short term memory for anyone to say there isn't complaining about it from the Bengals.

(06-01-2016, 09:31 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: This might have more impact IF bungal fans weren't the whiniest bitches in the NFL and IF they had actually managed to win a playoff game in 20+ years.

PIT plays physical.  CIN actually has 1 or 2 very dirty players.  That's the difference, and one most bungal whiners don't get and probably never will because your team doesn't know how to win games with clean and physical play.

(06-02-2016, 01:03 AM)Beaker Wrote: This post might have more impact if steeler players weren't the whiniest bitches in the NFL....taking to social media and crying about being targeted.

(06-02-2016, 08:15 AM)GMDino Wrote: Point of order:
When a player is asked a question and responds that is not "taking to social media and crying about being targeted".


That said, you don't think The Bengals would have been all over social media after the Carson hit?  Hell they were on twitter blaming everyone but themselves this past year.  

(06-02-2016, 10:06 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Bell may have been asked a question this time.   But a few months ago all he was doing was crying on Twitter.   And he was also crying shortly after the injury as well.    The reason he was asked those questions is because he made it a story by crying like a chump.  

I don't remember any social media explosions from bengals in 2005.  But you can go ahead and dream some up I guess.   

(06-02-2016, 10:06 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Bell may have been asked a question this time.   But a few months ago all he was doing was crying on Twitter.   And he was also crying shortly after the injury as well.    The reason he was asked those questions is because he made it a story by crying like a chump.  

I don't remember any social media explosions from bengals in 2005.  But you can go ahead and dream some up I guess.   

(06-02-2016, 10:06 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Bell may have been asked a question this time.   But a few months ago all he was doing was crying on Twitter.   And he was also crying shortly after the injury as well.    The reason he was asked those questions is because he made it a story by crying like a chump.  

I don't remember any social media explosions from bengals in 2005.  But you can go ahead and dream some up I guess.   

(06-02-2016, 10:25 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Social media didn't really exist in 2005, or at least not to the extent that it does now.  The media certainly didn't make much use of it in 2005, anyway.  

(06-02-2016, 10:25 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Social media didn't really exist in 2005, or at least not to the extent that it does now.  The media certainly didn't make much use of it in 2005, anyway.  

(06-02-2016, 11:40 AM)jason Wrote: It existed in 2013. When Huber's jaw and neck were obliterated by a cheap shot ( or as I like to say " got hit by a guy playing really hard"). Our punter didn't cry about it.... our punter. I don't recall a single Bengal behaving the way the Steelers have as of late. It may have happened. I just don't remember it.

(06-02-2016, 11:40 AM)jason Wrote: It existed in 2013. When Huber's jaw and neck were obliterated by a cheap shot ( or as I like to say " got hit by a guy playing really hard"). Our punter didn't cry about it.... our punter. I don't recall a single Bengal behaving the way the Steelers have as of late. It may have happened. I just don't remember it.

(06-02-2016, 11:40 AM)jason Wrote: It existed in 2013. When Huber's jaw and neck were obliterated by a cheap shot ( or as I like to say " got hit by a guy playing really hard"). Our punter didn't cry about it.... our punter. I don't recall a single Bengal behaving the way the Steelers have as of late. It may have happened. I just don't remember it.

(06-02-2016, 12:19 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: You have a VERY short memory...


http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/01/adam-pacman-jones-profanity-referees

(06-02-2016, 12:01 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: It was a punter... 

(06-02-2016, 12:44 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Exactly. Our punter sucks it up and moves on while your star RB can't quit crying. Over and over again.

Maybe I'm being too hard on the kid. After all, whining is the Steeler way.

1. Bend every rule possible in order to win (ie playing dirty physical, coaches tripping players, pulling their hair, manipulating refs etc)
2. When opponent responds in kind, whine as loudly as possible for as long as you can.

Bell is falling right in line with the Steelers piss yellow "gold" standard. 

(06-02-2016, 12:28 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Bengals fans have been trained to forget...It's the only valid way of dealing with the Bengals past, while having hope for the future.

(06-02-2016, 01:17 PM)GMDino Wrote: Based on this thread maybe he's just a Bengals fan and that's all he know how to do is ***** and complain?

(06-02-2016, 10:10 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Twitter didn't exist in 2005.  In fact the whole social media thing was still in it's very infancy and didn't have any traction in the sports world.  Hell...Facebook only started in 2004.  I don't remember anyone following My Space as a Social Medial outlet.

(06-02-2016, 10:25 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Social media didn't really exist in 2005, or at least not to the extent that it does now.  The media certainly didn't make much use of it in 2005, anyway.  

(06-02-2016, 10:29 AM)GMDino Wrote: So a guy who got injured voiced that he was upset about it.

Okay.

Next.