Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL (/thread-11571.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


RE: According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL - Essex Johnson - 07-16-2017

(07-16-2017, 02:24 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Or Marvin's?

Like I said rational responses..  Hilarious


RE: According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL - bfine32 - 07-16-2017

(07-16-2017, 02:44 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Like I said rational responses..  Hilarious

So we shouldn't downgrade Marvin for that one game at the end of the season? Just looking for clarity on your one game stance


RE: According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL - Brownshoe - 07-16-2017

(07-16-2017, 03:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So we shouldn't downgrade Marvin for that one game at the end of the season? Just looking for clarity on your one game stance

Marvin Lewis has only had 2 seasons above .500 without Dalton, and he had an overall losing record without Dalton.


RE: According to yahoo, Bengals tied with Giants for 18th best QB options in the NFL - Essex Johnson - 07-16-2017

(07-16-2017, 03:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So we shouldn't downgrade Marvin for that one game at the end of the season? Just looking for clarity on your one game stance

The clarity is we are talking about a QB vs a Coach.. you can;t just say a position player rating is the same as a coach rating etc..... I am comparing Dalton to QBs not to Coaches.. so yes your rational does not compute for me... Finally my position has been your repeated reference to "so called experts" and I have pointed out how volatile their rankings are year to year which to me shows the flaws and bias in their ranking... is that clarity enough for you now ??