+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay (/thread-15107.html)
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - fredtoast - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 02:52 PM)McC Wrote: I made no such claim. I just stated the fact that Mike has a soft spot in his heart for Adam Jones, a fact Mike has publicly stated. I can't help what you might have inferred from what I said. Again, I repeat to you that if you respond to what I actually say, we can discuss anything.
When you quote a previous comment it usually means you are either agreeing or disagreeing with that quote.
So when you quoted a post claiming that MB would never let Adam walk and then commented about how "safe" Adam was close to Mike heart EVERYONE here assumed you were agreeing with the post you quoted.
So if we just want to address your exact quote what exactly did youmean Adam was "safe" from?
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - McC - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 02:58 PM)fredtoast Wrote: When you quote a previous comment it usually means you are either agreeing or disagreeing with that quote.
So when you quoted a post claiming that MB would never let Adam walk and then commented about how "safe" Adam was close to Mike heart EVERYONE here assumed you were agreeing with the post you quoted.
So if we just want to address your exact quote what exactly did youmean Adam was "safe" from?
You know the old saying about when you assume, right?
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - fredtoast - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:01 PM)McC Wrote: You know the old saying about when you assume, right?
You know that old saying about what it means when someone refuses to answer a simple question?
Why play little games? Why not just say what you mean?
You never thought Mike Brown would refuse to pick up Adams option and you were 100% wrong about that..
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - McC - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:06 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You know that old saying about what it means when someone refuses to answer a simple question?
Why play little games? Why not just say what you mean?
You never thought Mike Brown would refuse to pick up Adams option and you were 100% wrong about that..
No. Not familiar with that old saying. Please enlighten me, in lieu of discussing what I actually said.
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - fredtoast - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:11 PM)McC Wrote: No. Not familiar with that old saying. Please enlighten me, in lieu of discussing what I actually said.
When people refuse to answer a simple question it is because they are either embarrassed or afraid.
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - McC - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:14 PM)fredtoast Wrote: When people refuse to answer a simple question it is because they are either embarrassed or afraid.
Yeah, I've never heard that old saying. It's not a very good one. I predict it won't catch on.
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - fredtoast - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:15 PM)McC Wrote: Yeah, I've never heard that old saying. It's not a very good one. I predict it won't catch on.
I can certainly understand why you don't like it.
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - McC - 03-12-2018
(03-12-2018, 03:17 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I can certainly understand why you don't like it.
Then we agree it's lame.
RE: Jones on his way out or to at least reduced pay - SHRacerX - 03-13-2018
(03-09-2018, 04:31 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/03/09/bengals-tell-pacman-he-wont-be-back-without-a-pay-cut/
But I'm sure some will find fault with this good decision too.
Don't want him back