Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake (/thread-26301.html) |
RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SunsetBengal - 01-01-2021 (12-30-2020, 07:26 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Except why did Burrow get hurt? Because of a bad OL and a bad offensive playcaller. Not attempting to defend Taylor, but didn't Burrow have full capability to audible his own plays as he saw fit? The truth of the matter is we really don't know exactly how many plays that were sent in from the sidelines actually were ran as called on the field. For all we know, our rookie superstar might have just gambled on himself time after time. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SuperBowlBound! - 01-01-2021 (01-01-2021, 04:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Not attempting to defend Taylor, but didn't Burrow have full capability to audible his own plays as he saw fit? The truth of the matter is we really don't know exactly how many plays that were sent in from the sidelines actually were ran as called on the field. For all we know, our rookie superstar might have just gambled on himself time after time. I always thought they sent in 2 plays to give QB the option based on his pre read. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nately120 - 01-01-2021 (01-01-2021, 12:09 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: We'll win 6 or 7 games next year and these Homer's will talk about injuries, how Burrow had no offseason, etc. Burrow is also technically still going to be a rookie in 2021...the joys of an injury-riddled rookie season for our 1st round picks. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SunsetBengal - 01-01-2021 (01-01-2021, 05:59 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: I always thought they sent in 2 plays to give QB the option based on his pre read. I'm not sure about that. What I do think is that for every formation that they're in, there are a complete set of plays that the QB can audible to when he sees something. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - bengalfan74 - 01-01-2021 (01-01-2021, 12:09 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: We'll win 6 or 7 games next year and these Homer's will talk about injuries, how Burrow had no offseason, etc. That's my big fear as well. We go 6-9-1 winning a couple late in season. We start hearing the usual excuses, players X,Y, and Z were injured, Burrow didn't make it back to start season, Oline needed 12 games to gel, defense was improving towards end, we lost 5 games by 7 points or less, and so on. Given all the obstacles (that every other team faces as well) Zac faced we're gonna extend him. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - TheLeonardLeap - 01-01-2021 (01-01-2021, 04:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Not attempting to defend Taylor, but didn't Burrow have full capability to audible his own plays as he saw fit? The truth of the matter is we really don't know exactly how many plays that were sent in from the sidelines actually were ran as called on the field. For all we know, our rookie superstar might have just gambled on himself time after time. So a HC/Playcaller sees his QB audible himself into passing over 40 times per game behind a shoddy line and doesn't put a stop to it? That would be a whole new problem if true, Sunset. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Bengalholic - 01-01-2021 A few more crazy stats when it comes to the history of coaches with Zac's record: Excluding Zac and Kyle Shanahan, who are both still active, and Dick Vermeil, who retired after his 3rd season with Rams ---
RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nicomo Cosca - 01-02-2021 (01-01-2021, 01:58 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: Stefanski inherited team that was picked to be i the playoffs the year before. The Bengals weremnot picks dto be in playoffs. Nobody would have predicted the playoffs for Cleveland had they known OBJ would miss half the season. And Garrett several games due to covid protocol. Yet they didn’t miss a beat. It’s almost like Stefanski is a really good coach or something... RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - bengalfan74 - 01-02-2021 (01-02-2021, 12:13 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Nobody would have predicted the playoffs for Cleveland had they known OBJ would miss half the season. And Garrett several games due to covid protocol. Yet they didn’t miss a beat. It’s almost like Stefanski is a really good coach or something... Not to mention making Baker Hayfield look like he's an NFL QB RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nicomo Cosca - 01-02-2021 (01-02-2021, 12:29 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Not to mention making Baker Hayfield look like he's an NFL QB I’m referring to him as such for here on lol Well done, sir. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - SladeX - 01-02-2021 (01-01-2021, 06:43 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: So a HC/Playcaller sees his QB audible himself into passing over 40 times per game behind a shoddy line and doesn't put a stop to it? That would be a whole new problem if true, Sunset. My thoughts exactly. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - impactplaya - 01-02-2021 (01-02-2021, 12:13 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Nobody would have predicted the playoffs for Cleveland had they known OBJ would miss half the season. And Garrett several games due to covid protocol. Yet they didn’t miss a beat. It’s almost like Stefanski is a really good coach or something... Stefanski is a darn good coach. He understands the balance of a run pass ratio. He knows how to make use of what he has And get the most out of them. Chubb missed 5 games...Beckham 10. And still the 2nd best redzone team in the league If he the Bengals coach this team would be better Than 4 10 1 now RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - TheLeonardLeap - 01-03-2021 (01-01-2021, 04:12 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: 3 teams with at least 10 win (only division) and combined 36 wins in our division (most in the league). Its not this is some dumpy division. Bengals are 0-3-1 against the NFC East this year, perhaps the worst division in NFL history over a two year span. The NFC East is going to average 5.875 wins per team this year after averaging just 6 wins per team last year. Keep in mind that the least amount of wins a division can possibly average is 3 just by sheer virtue of divisional games. 3-0-1 against the Bengals 12-12 against themselves 8-28 against everyone else That's the dumpiest division, and they didn't get a single loss against Taylor. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Rubekahn29 - 01-03-2021 (01-03-2021, 12:02 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Bengals are 0-3-1 against the NFC East this year, perhaps the worst division in NFL history over a two year span. Oh cool man... I had no idea... this information is earth shattering and changes my opinion on everything. Good on you. RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - chopperbobby - 01-03-2021 (01-01-2021, 04:19 AM)Murdock2420 Wrote: I'm not a fanboy of Taylor He will not give up play calling RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - XenoMorph - 01-04-2021 (12-30-2020, 07:59 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Yeah, the guy has a .114 win % in non-December games - .114! He's done practically nothing in each of his 2 years until the season is completely down the crapper, then he wins a couple of late season games. there has been nothing impressive except how fast he took this team back to the bottom of the nfl |