(10-30-2024, 05:34 PM)bengalrick Wrote: A dome????  This ownership won’t even build a practice bubble or a walkway over the street to the practice field!  The Brown family will never go for that.

(10-18-2024, 10:41 PM)BengalsLUFC Wrote: Can see both sides when it comes to having a dome.


We already have the best home support in the NFL with a dome we probably break the decibel level every other week.

It gives the city use for it in the offseason and that’s the kicker if they want it they should pay for it.

If I had the casting vote I’d say no to it, I was at the Baltimore game the other week and it was boiling then I’ve been to games where it’s freezing and that is proper football weather.

Then again I’ve been lucky the past 6 years the last time I was at a game and it pissed it down was the Steelers at home in 2018.

Keep the stadium as it is apart from the proposed updates, build the proper facility next door and hold the FO accountable to putting a team on the field worthy of the investment.

(Yesterday, 10:58 AM)ochocincos Wrote: What do you mean by "best home support in the NFL"?
Paycor isn't even in the Top 10 in loudest stadiums on gameday.

1) Chiefs
2) Seahawks
3) Saints (dome)
4) Cardinals (dome)
5) Packers
6) Vikings (dome)
7) Patriots
8) Ravens
9) Steelers
10) Cowboys (dome)

https://www.givemesport.com/ranking-the-top-10-loudest-nfl-stadiums-by-average-decibels/