McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' (/thread-13236.html) |
RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - McC - 11-01-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Except that all those 'excuses' are also an unfortunate reality. As I said, Andy certainly has his share of blame in those games, but the fact is that the entire team and coaching staff shit their collective pants as well. Remember using AJ as a decoy for an entire half? RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - bfine32 - 11-01-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:08 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: 1. Because you're intentionally cryptic with your points? Kinda leads to people assuming what you're driving at, because people don't have the patience to deal with that crap. But surprisingly you considered attempts in 2009. I wonder why? I suppose we'll go with dense Mod as I am not being intentionally obtuse. I think I'll reserve conversation for others in this forum. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - bfine32 - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:41 PM)McC Wrote: Well, if you were swimming and you had an anchor chained to your back, how much would you have to say about the temperature of the water? You'd have a lot to say about the water temperature if you were used to swimming with the anchor on your back; however, if it were the first time you ever had an anchor on your back it'd be all you could think about, RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Shake n Blake - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 11:14 PM)bfine32 Wrote: But surprisingly you considered attempts in 2009. I wonder why? Funny, you keep talking like I'm bending numbers to make things look worse, but you ignored the link I kindly offered. If you think the throws per sack numbers would somehow tell a different story, let's see them. Until then, toodles. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Utts - 11-02-2017 Andy is not the problem. However, regardless of protection, we can do better at QB, and the answer might still be on our roster thanks to the other inept Ohio franchise to the North. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 04:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I think the fact you have to go back almost 30 years to call horseshit speaks for itself. Palmer was always well protected. He did get his nose busted in a preseason game once and folks lost their minds, but his protection was always well above average. Yeah....nothing screams great line like Dennis Roland, Nate Livings, Stacy Andrews, and Eric Ghaicuic. 2009 was so great....we had to continually use unbalanced sets WITH a FB to generate a ground game. It's history repeating itself. The first few years, Palmer had a GREAT line. They let it go to shit. Same with Dalton. Palmer got more than a bloody nose....he got his elbow wrecked too, in case you forgot. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 04:35 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: So, lets's take a look at the 4 playoff games that Andy played in. Sums it up to a tee. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 05:34 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: If you're talking just Palmer/Dalton era, I agree, we've never seen anything close to this bad as far as the whole o-line and as you said, especially at LT. While nowhere near as bad as what we've seen this year, I'd argue that the end of 2007-09, the line was pretty bad. Anytime you're having to run unbalanced sets with a FB to run the football in this league, you're bad at your job. The pass pro during those years weren't stellar either. By 2010, they were starting to regroup, by 2012, it was a good unit. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 09:24 PM)Deanlj69 Wrote: So we can all agree that the problem is the Piano Man. Seems like he has no clue on how to build or evaluate players where you have multi faceted lineman that can actually run block and pass block. BTW....I'm not calling you a *****.....just thought the gif was funny RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Except that all those 'excuses' are also an unfortunate reality. As I said, Andy certainly has his share of blame in those games, but the fact is that the entire team and coaching staff shit their collective pants as well. Oh yes they can.....if anything goes wrong, it's the QBs fault. Some people don't understand all of the moving pieces involved in making a good football team. As you said, Dalton shares his share of the blame in those games, but even the great Dan Marino couldn't elevate bad defenses and some mediocre talent on O, with some good talent sprinkled in here and there. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:45 PM)McC Wrote: Remember using AJ as a decoy for an entire half? Only "apologists" and excuse makers remember that.... RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-02-2017, 02:56 AM)Utts Wrote: Andy is not the problem. However, regardless of protection, we can do better at QB, and the answer might still be on our roster thanks to the other inept Ohio franchise to the North. We could, but unfortunately, I don't see anyone offering those guys up for trade, and it ain't like we'd trade for one anyway. FWIW, I was for drafting Bridgewater a few years back for competition, and wouldn't have minded Watson this year. No, we don't have that on our bench. In my opinion, he is a notch below what we have starting. He's a good QB, and would make a fine stop gap, but I don't see AJ as a guy that can carry a team either. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Bengalholic - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:45 PM)McC Wrote: Remember using AJ as a decoy for an entire half? Yup...what an ingenious piece of game planning that was. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Atomic Orange - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 09:57 PM)bengalsfansince93 Wrote: You know what I see here? A bunch of excuses for a mediocre QB. (11-01-2017, 09:59 PM)bengalsfansince93 Wrote: Funny that's how I feel about Dalton apologists. Take the time to refute the evidence otherwise you are just trolling. :andy: RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Bengalholic - 11-02-2017 (11-02-2017, 09:44 AM)Wyche Wrote: While nowhere near as bad as what we've seen this year, I'd argue that the end of 2007-09, the line was pretty bad. Anytime you're having to run unbalanced sets with a FB to run the football in this league, you're bad at your job. The pass pro during those years weren't stellar either. By 2010, they were starting to regroup, by 2012, it was a good unit. Yeah, no doubt those lines had some issues of their own, especially when Gutcheck was at C and then Lurch at RT...but man, this year's line is just bad across the line - turnstiles at C and both T spots, and 2 G's getting exposed because of the lack of competence on either side of them. As I've said before, this group just isn't very talented and that's not something you can change. Boling is the best of the group, but his limitations become much more obvious when others aren't playing well, and then his play suffers. They can't pass block with any consistency. They can't run block with any consistency. They have trouble engaging defenders, sustaining blocks, opening lanes, protecting their QB and then there's the coaching - or lack thereof - which is a whole other issue. Basically, they're just bad at football. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Socal Bengals fan - 11-02-2017 Andy is mediocre at best. he cant hang in the pocket, he scramble for shit, cant throw on the run, and isnt clutch at all. yes the offensive line is complete garbage but we can definitely upgrade at quarterback. i remember the first playoff game against the Texans AJ Green was wide open for a touchdown with a few seconds left. Andy over threw him and i kinda knew back then that Dalton didnt have "It". RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Bengalholic - 11-02-2017 (11-02-2017, 11:38 AM)Socal Bengals fan Wrote: Andy is mediocre at best. he cant hang in the pocket, he scramble for shit, cant throw on the run, and isnt clutch at all. yes the offensive line is complete garbage but we can definitely upgrade at quarterback. i remember the first playoff game against the Texans AJ Green was wide open for a touchdown with a few seconds left. Andy over threw him and i kinda knew back then that Dalton didnt have "It". Yeah, even though Andy completed 64% of his passes and accounted for 80% of the offensive yards, he also turned the ball over 3 times, which certainly hurt the cause. However, you failed to mention that the defense allowed 8 - count 'em, 8 - drives of 7 minutes or longer...and allowed Arian Foster to look like Gale Sayers. It's fine to criticize Andy for his failings in that game, and others, but you also have to acknowledge that there were many other problems that led to the end result. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - Wyche'sWarrior - 11-02-2017 (11-02-2017, 11:32 AM)Bengalholic Wrote: Yeah, no doubt those lines had some issues of their own, especially when Gutcheck was at C and then Lurch at RT...but man, this year's line is just bad across the line - turnstiles at C and both T spots, and 2 G's getting exposed because of the lack of competence on either side of them. You forgot "Nasty" Nate Livings....lol. Honestly, this may be the worst unit I've ever seen. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - coachmcneil71 - 11-02-2017 (10-31-2017, 12:55 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Re-watching the Colts game just makes me more infuriated with Marvin's insistence during the offseason that the o-line 'is not a concern' and during the season that 'they just need to play better'. Boom! Very well stated & a shame that folks like us can clearly see it while the supposed professionals on this staff do not. RE: McAlister: 'And people think Andy is the problem? ' - PhilHos - 11-02-2017 (11-01-2017, 10:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Except that all those 'excuses' are also an unfortunate reality. As I said, Andy certainly has his share of blame in those games, but the fact is that the entire team and coaching staff shit their collective pants as well. You'd be best ignoring him, BH. This is the same guy that considers throwing 4000+ yards and 30+ TDs in a season to be a mediocre season. Or a team having a winning season is mediocre. (11-02-2017, 02:56 AM)Utts Wrote: Andy is not the problem. However, regardless of protection, we can do better at QB, and the answer might still be on our roster thanks to the other inept Ohio franchise to the North. Yes, we can do better at QB, but not much better. Andy is above average. So to do better, we'd need to find someone that's great or elite. We'd be better served using those resources in building a better TEAM that can overcome Andy's shortcomings, than looking for the ever-elusive elite QB. Part of the reason we were so bad in the nineties was Mike Brown's insistence on finding that elite QB. I'd rather not go back to that when we have a good QB already. As to the idea that McCarron being better, possibly, but in his short time in games, he hasn't shown any reason why he would be better than Dalton. The same, maybe, but better? I would need to see more. (11-02-2017, 11:38 AM)Socal Bengals fan Wrote: Andy is mediocre at best. he cant hang in the pocket, he scramble for shit, cant throw on the run, and isnt clutch at all. yes the offensive line is complete garbage but we can definitely upgrade at quarterback. i remember the first playoff game against the Texans AJ Green was wide open for a touchdown with a few seconds left. Andy over threw him and i kinda knew back then that Dalton didnt have "It". Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. Yes, and true, but not by much. One play in his 2nd season was enough to decide that for you? Not all the game winning drives he's had in his career (at one point, he had one of the most game winning drives in the league since his rookie season - I think it was prior to last season)? Just a play where he slightly overthrew AJ in the last seconds of a playoff game? |