Big Whit? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Big Whit? (/thread-34196.html) |
RE: Big Whit? - Sled21 - 12-28-2022 (12-28-2022, 09:39 AM)Au165 Wrote: To everyone asking who would claim him…literally every AFC playoff team simply to block him (although Jacksonville lost their LT recently) and sit him. No one is scared of billeting board material or pissing people off they are worried about real life controllable outcomes. The whole reasons vested veterans go through waivers post trade deadline is this exact scenario. It was literally put in so teams could intentionally block guys from being slid to teams making runs. As it should be. Our last memories of Whit should not be him getting rag dolled at tackle and cause us a loss in the playoffs. RE: Big Whit? - Big_Ern - 12-28-2022 (12-28-2022, 09:44 AM)Sled21 Wrote: As it should be. Our last memories of Whit should not be him getting rag dolled at tackle and cause us a loss in the playoffs. Instead they'll just be him winning a SB at our expense RE: Big Whit? - Bengalitis - 12-28-2022 Glad Whit is not coming back... best decision Zac has made since being a Bengal coach. RE: Big Whit? - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 12-28-2022 (12-27-2022, 11:21 PM)QueenCity Wrote: I made this thread knowing it was a complete long shot - but Big Whit certainly did not shoot it down like I thought he would this week. But he did. What he did not shoot down was a return. He soecifically said he did not want to come in here and mess things up. He acknowledged he'd never played RT and switching sides was tough. He was way more negative on the Bengals specifically than on returning generally. That's a no without saying no. |