(04-27-2017, 02:57 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Center was indeed the weak spot on the team 2 years ago.

At some points, it was our inability to cover the TE and a lot of us advocated for signing a guy like Darryl Smith would wasn't asking for $10 million a year...but would address these issues.

Did we lose to the Steelers in the playoffs because of Bodine solely? Of course not. But, when you get to the playoffs it's good team vs good team...so you need to have all of your positions as strong as you can.

To know that Center or MLB is a weak spot and not address it when you have cap space...leads to losing playoff games.

(04-27-2017, 03:15 PM)Wyche Wrote: Yes, this^^^^^^.

We haven't been able to cover a TE since Moby Dick was a minnow.....hoping Minter helps in that department.

(04-27-2017, 03:18 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: The big thing that the Bengal apologists are missing is you don't fail to win a playoff game for 26+ years and lose 7 playoff games without winning a single one by luck.

Obviously there are SOME weaknesses on the team.

Going into a season with excess cap space that could be used to address these weaknesses when you have a Top 5 roster in the NFL...is indefensible. THAT'S THE PRIME TIME TO SPEND!

(04-27-2017, 04:09 PM)Wyche Wrote: EXACTLY.

(04-27-2017, 04:49 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: There seems to be an all-or-nothing mentality on the board too. Like people divide themselves into thinking the Bengals Management is horrible or great. Because admitting that maybe there is some room for improvement from the team that you spend hours and hours watching is just unthinkable. It's easier to just break it down into Horrible or Great.

The real truth lies somewhere in the middle. We had about 2 GREAT drafts in a row coupled with 2 more good ones. Then, we have about 4 below average to bad drafts.

We were the young up-and-coming team for part of these playoff runs which was exciting...but at some point we peaked and started losing A LOT of players through attrition.

You don't just keep getting better on a linear scale from year-to-year. You have to draft well and supplement your losses.

By not signing Tier 1, 2, and 3 free agents...and relying almost exclusively on the draft...these past 4 subpar drafts have really hurt the Bengals on field product going forward.

Is there hope? Yes. If guys like Jackson and Billings turn into great Pro's. If guys like Dennard finally starts playing well. If a guy like Paul Dawson comes out of nowhere to be great. If we draft 2-3 Pro Bowl players this year.

(04-27-2017, 03:18 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: The big thing that the Bengal apologists are missing is you don't fail to win a playoff game for 26+ years and lose 7 playoff games without winning a single one by luck.

Obviously there are SOME weaknesses on the team.

Going into a season with excess cap space that could be used to address these weaknesses when you have a Top 5 roster in the NFL...is indefensible. THAT'S THE PRIME TIME TO SPEND!

(01-01-2017, 12:05 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Just imagine how much worse we'do be if we foolishly signed big-name free agents. Just look at the Redskins.

Ummm. Wait a second.

Haha

(08-19-2017, 07:05 PM)Bronze Bengal Wrote: Considering The Redskins have only five playoff appearances with only two wins in the last eighteen years their strategy isn't a very good one.

(08-19-2017, 07:05 PM)Bronze Bengal Wrote: Considering The Redskins have only five playoff appearances with only two wins in the last eighteen years their strategy isn't a very good one.

(08-19-2017, 07:13 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: It's certainly yielded more playoff wins than ours.

People always point out the worst of the worst to show the Bengals strategy isn't bad. The Redskins for free agency. The Browns for overall success.

You can look at most of the recent Super Bowl winners and see key free agents they signed. The Redskins try to build an entire roster through free agency. You can't do that.

The years where we had a good roster would have been prime time to bring that key free agent in. Like had we signed Dansby instead of Harrison. Dansby was a better fit. Harrison was an OLB in the 3-4 and didn't really fit here. But, Harrison was willing to sign for less money than Dansby. Dansby still had some tread left on the tires at that point too...unlike last year.

(12-31-2016, 11:42 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: - 23 teams have been to a Super Bowl. 72% of the league
- Every team besides the Browns, Texans and Lions has won at least 4 playoff games
- 11 teams have won at least 11 playoff games
- 26 teams have at least 5 playoff wins, which is how many the Bengals have in their 49 year history
- 13 teams have been to multiple Super Bowls
- 14 teams have won a Super Bowl

Here's the playoff records for all teams from 1991-2015

Patriots: 25-12
Packers: 19-16
Steelers: 18-14
Ravens: 15-8
Broncos: 15-11
Cowboys: 14-10
49ers: 14-11
Colts: 14-15
Seahawks: 12-10
Eagles: 12-13
Giants: 11-7
Panthers: 9-7
Bills: 8-7 (3rd longest streak, at 21 seasons)
Saints: 7-7
Jets: 7-8
Chargers: 7-9
Rams: 6-4
Cardinals: 6-5
Redskins: 6-6
Oilers/Titans: 6-9
Falcons: 6-9
Vikings: 6-13
Raiders: 5-5
Jaguars: 5-6
Buccaneers: 5-6
Dolphins: 5-9
Bears: 4-6
Chiefs: 4-11 (broke a 22 year streak last year)
Texans: 2-3 (both wins over Bengals)
Browns: 1-2 (streak is now at 19 seasons)
Lions: 1-8 (their streak is only 1 year shorter)
Bengals: 0-7 (the streak is now up to 26 seasons)

______________________

The only teams to not play in a Super Bowl during this span are:

Jets
Dolphins
Browns
Bengals
Texans
Jaguars
Chiefs
Lions
Vikings

(08-19-2017, 07:19 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: With those two in mind, and you might as well include AJ Hawk in that lump sum of over the hill signings, how do you feel about the signing of Minter this year?  

(12-13-2017, 02:38 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I made this thread prior to the playoffs last year. It's even worse now and will get worse again in a month.