Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) (/thread-11907.html) |
Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Trademark - 08-05-2017 Quote:CINCINNATI -- The Bengals are less than a week out from their preseason opener against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and it's clear they're still very much a work in progress. http://www.espn.com/blog/cincinnati-bengals/post/_/id/27468/rookies-joe-mixon-josh-malone-catching-eyes-in-bengals-first-scrimmage I have a feeling we found a gem with Malone. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-05-2017 Forgot we got Chris Smith, damn deep at End all of a sudden. Boling being 100% this year is huge, i truly believe he was the better Guard to keep out of him and Zeitler cause Boling is a very good run blocker. Man, Lawson just won't let up will he? Lol, sounds like the man is on a mission. Cannot wait to see him rush the Pig in the Pitt. Expecting a huge year out of Dalton and Mixon. Malone does remind me of Chris Henry. Glad he is improving cause he is still a little raw on his routes. Hearing Ross fielding Punts is a bit of a surprise. I wouldn't put him in those situations if i was the coach but it could be a good sign on his shoulder and he should be all ready to go against the Ratbirds. Reps Trademark. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - TheLeonardLeap - 08-05-2017 First-team O versus second-team D. First-team D versus second-team O. No sacks allowed. Eh... RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Trademark - 08-05-2017 (08-05-2017, 07:09 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Forgot we got Chris Smith, damn deep at End all of a sudden. Boling being 100% this year is huge, i truly believe Marvin said Lawson will be unleashed and Lawson said he's basically playing with a chip on his shoulder. I'm so hyped for this season, I have a feeling it will be special. http://www.espn.com/blog/cincinnati-bengals/post/_/id/27424/marvin-lewis-carl-lawson-is-going-to-get-unleashed RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Luvnit2 - 08-05-2017 (08-05-2017, 06:58 PM)Trademark Wrote: http://www.espn.com/blog/cincinnati-bengals/post/_/id/27468/rookies-joe-mixon-josh-malone-catching-eyes-in-bengals-first-scrimmageMixon is the real deal. If you have not seen him in camp, the guy has hue guns, looks quicker and faster than Hill and other backs. On defense, we keep heating Chris Smith's name so Sims or others may be in trouble to make the 53. Rookie Glasglow as well RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - BFritz21 - 08-05-2017 With the way they're talking up Tra Carson on the website, I'd say it might be time for Hill to be worried since Mixon is looking good. People keep saying we'll keep him because he's cheap and is good for the goal line carries, but I think this team is ready to move on from Hill and his happy feet, fumble away an entire organization/city/fan-base's glory-self. Mixon looks like the real deal and there's no reason not to go all-in with him, especially for how it will energize the team and fanbase because everyone still has a sour taste in their mouth from the fumble. Does anyone else's Mac wait until you've typed a few words after "Mixon" and autocorrect it to "Nixon"? It's annoying as hell. Keep four backs: 1. Mixon 2. Gio 3. Peerman for special teams (if his hamstring is ok) 4. Tra. Tra seems more like a out-of-the-backfield catcher like Gio, and they might want to keep him as they ease in Gio. I love that Malone is looking good because I think he needs to put on a little weight, but I keep saying that I love to have him and AJ opposite each other in the red zone to throw jump balls to either one. The line is apparently looking a bit better, which they still scare me, but that does make me feel a little better. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Sled21 - 08-07-2017 I'd keep Boom Williams over Tra Carson. We keep hearing about Lawson, but not a peep about how Billings is doing this year. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - Brownshoe - 08-07-2017 (08-07-2017, 08:12 AM)Sled21 Wrote: I'd keep Boom Williams over Tra Carson. We keep hearing about Lawson, but not a peep about how Billings is doing this year. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. You're not going to hear much from interior linemen this time of year. We will see what he's able to do next Friday. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - bfine32 - 08-07-2017 (08-05-2017, 07:47 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: With the way they're talking up Tra Carson on the website, I'd say it might be time for Hill to be worried since Mixon is looking good. People keep saying we'll keep him because he's cheap and is good for the goal line carries, but I think this team is ready to move on from Hill and his happy feet, fumble away an entire organization/city/fan-base's glory-self. You do realize the reason folks are "talking up" Carson is because he's having to take extended snaps because Mixon has a bad heel and Gio is coming back from ACL. So ask yourself: In that scenario does it make sense that the team is more motivated to cut Hill because of Carson's extra reps. Hill is here and he's playing out his contract (unless traded). I remember folks saying we're gonna cut Benson to give Bernard Scott and Brian Leonard more touches or we're going to cut BJGE to give Burkhead and Gio more carries. The Bengals are going to hold on to the proven workhorse until someone else proves he can be that workhorse. RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - bengalfan74 - 08-07-2017 (08-07-2017, 01:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You do realize the reason folks are "talking up" Carson is because he's having to take extended snaps because Mixon has a bad heel and Gio is coming back from ACL. So ask yourself: In that scenario does it make sense that the team is more motivated to cut Hill because of Carson's extra reps. Agree bfine, Hill's not going anywhere RE: Mixon and Malone catching eyes on first scrimmage (ESPN) - ochocincos - 08-07-2017 (08-07-2017, 01:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You do realize the reason folks are "talking up" Carson is because he's having to take extended snaps because Mixon has a bad heel and Gio is coming back from ACL. So ask yourself: In that scenario does it make sense that the team is more motivated to cut Hill because of Carson's extra reps. To be fair, the bengals did cut BJGE with a year left on his contract because of the addition of Hill. I was actually surprised when it happened. Speaking of BJGE, I'm surprised he only played six seasons. I thought for sure he'd latch on with another team after being cut by the Bengals. He's 32 now though, so no chance he could make a return. |