![]() |
Re-Sign Pacman - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Re-Sign Pacman (/thread-16355.html) |
Re-Sign Pacman - THE Bigzoman - 07-09-2018 Because why not? I reallly don't like our CB detph after WJIII, RE: Re-Sign Pacman - grampahol - 07-09-2018 Pretty sure a long list of reasons why they shouldn't re-sign him will be forthcoming at a theater near you and maybe in your grocers freezer. I personally don't really care. He's a bone head, but can still play the game. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - jason - 07-09-2018 I wouldn't bring him back just for the hell of it. Dude was drafted in 05, and played a key role in blowing their first postseason win in forever. If a guy goes down to injury, and Pacman's available, I could see them bringing him back. Chris Crocker 2.0 baby!!! RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Bilbo Saggins - 07-09-2018 There are two rookie corners on this roster who may someday develop into good players. If there were an injury to one of the big 3? OK I could see it. Otherwise? Don't think that I'd agree with it. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - hollodero - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 01:01 AM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: Because why not? Because he demands money and because he's an idiot. If he's willing to stay for little money, I'd be fine with it though. He still has qualities. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Sled21 - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 07:09 AM)hollodero Wrote: Because he demands money and because he's an idiot. Say what you will about him, Pac never asked for more than he was worth, he always just wanted a fair deal. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Au165 - 07-09-2018 Last season he was pretty bad. There will be better options available during camp cuts if we have concerns. The thing you have to remember is we are going to a more physical press man scheme instead of the off zone scheme we have ran while Pacman was here. I just don't see him as a fit to play here anymore. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Tiger Teeth - 07-09-2018 I'm not sure how I feel about this, let me get back to you later. ![]() RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Luvnit2 - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 08:21 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Say what you will about him, Pac never asked for more than he was worth, he always just wanted a fair deal. I agree, he never broke the bank and he could have. He also is the only CB we have had that consistently shut down Antonio Brown which is very important if we want any shot beating the Steelers. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Au165 - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 09:34 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I agree, he never broke the bank and he could have. He also is the only CB we have had that consistently shut down Antonio Brown which is very important if we want any shot beating the Steelers. ![]() RE: Re-Sign Pacman - XenoMorph - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 01:01 AM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: Because why not? Jones can still play but we have been getting less from him each year as he ages.... But Jackson Dennard and Kirkpatrick aren't a bad tandem. Someone will call adam as asoon as a CB goes down in Camp though RE: Re-Sign Pacman - ochocincos - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 01:01 AM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: Because why not? Why don't you like the depth after WJ3? I get DK isn't a top 10 CB but he's not a bum. He's a decent CB2/3. Dennard needs to get more playing time in the final year of his contract to see if he's worth extending. I thought Russell was a good waiver wire steal in 2016 and was a nice prospect coming out of ND. I like him as a depth CB. Shaw has been valuable for the Bengals over the past few years even though he wasn't good last year. Phillips was a great get in the 5th round. I hope/expect him to be a ST beast and develop into a good slot CB. I wasn't that high on Harris but I can see him being a replacement for Shaw if Shaw is not re-signed next year. Overall, I think it's a pretty solid group and I'd only re-sign Adam Jones if/when an injury occurs. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Luvnit2 - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 09:54 AM)Au165 Wrote: Nice to see, but Brown is a beast in the slot and unlike Jones, Jackson never covers Brown in the slot. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Au165 - 07-09-2018 Brown only played 8% of his snaps in the slot last year. Dennard will be fine handling him for 8% of snaps. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - coachmcneil71 - 07-09-2018 Let us know what you decide after you get done reading your newspaper TT! ![]() RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Tiger Teeth - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 10:28 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Let us know what you decide after you get done reading your newspaper TT! Well, after further review, I think he would be okay if the price was right and we really needed him. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Go Cards - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 10:09 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Why don't you like the depth after WJ3? This RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Go Cards - 07-09-2018 Plus would like to see a season without MB's pets Piano Man and Pac Man. Seemingly he has a thing for the initials PM. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Wyche'sWarrior - 07-09-2018 Call me crazy......but for the right money, I'd rather have him fielding kicks than Erickson. RE: Re-Sign Pacman - Luvnit2 - 07-09-2018 (07-09-2018, 10:19 AM)Au165 Wrote: Brown only played 8% of his snaps in the slot last year. Dennard will be fine handling him for 8% of snaps. Well it appears you have all the answers so hope you are correct. ![]() ![]() |