Bengals roster projections - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Bengals roster projections (/thread-1665.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Bengals roster projections - magikod - 08-27-2015 http://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2015/08/26/bengals-roster-projection-20/32435853/ Quote:Quarterbacks (2) RE: Bengals roster projections - J24 - 08-27-2015 Why is Peerman a lock? Burkhead can do everything Peerman can? Plus Wilder looks really good out there!
I would rather have Moore on the Team then Tate personally. Moore has been better throughout his career than Tate plus it would be a mistake not to have another Quality WR on the team after what happened last season with the injuries to that position.
Deshawn should make he team over Hunt. At this point what has Hunt done to prove he is capable of anything?
The only way we should keep 7 Linebackers is if they want Vontaz to get some practice time before week 6 if not go with 6. Hawk should be the odd man left out.
We should go with 6 corners and not 5. You can never have to many Corners. If Hall can play some safety then why not cut Williams or Smith at Safety instead of an extra corner?
RE: Bengals roster projections - BengalChris - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 02:23 AM)J24 Wrote: I'm with you on Wilder. He played very well when given the opportunity. He had a couple of tackles on special teams and ran the ball well. Neither Gio nor Burkhead can play Hill's role of a primary RB. They are both complementary RBs. Peerman is another complementary guy. We still haven't found a WR/returner who's better than Tate and that's disturbing. RE: Bengals roster projections - EatonFan - 08-27-2015 I thought I remembered Hue Jackson say Moore was one of the best returners he'd ever seen, yet we haven't seen him back there fielding any punts. Was I just imagining that? RE: Bengals roster projections - BritishBengal - 08-27-2015 I think they have nailed that lineup. RE: Bengals roster projections - SHRacerX - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 01:44 AM)magikod Wrote: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2015/08/26/bengals-roster-projection-20/32435853/ I would have no problem with these decisions whatsoever. I have been very impressed with Troy Hill out of Oregon, and I would bet he would get swooped up off the PS. The Bengals might try to carry him on the roster at the expense of Flowers, but I don't really know how strong he performs at special teams. At RB, I think they like Wilder as the bigger back that would be able to be a bell-cow, but I don't think they knock off Peerman due to his special teams ability. Maybe they keep Wilder over Flowers? I would say those are the biggest questions moving forward. It should be interesting to see a WR like Kumerow get a lot of targets this next game to see if he can show he belongs. RE: Bengals roster projections - SHRacerX - 08-27-2015 One other thing: They would have a LOT of decisions to make when those guys are ready to come off the PUP. Maybe Ogbuehi gets placed on the (single spot) IR-designated to return list. This is just one of the many reasons I would like to see rosters expand to 60 players. RE: Bengals roster projections - ochocincos - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 02:32 AM)BengalChris Wrote: I'm with you on Wilder. He played very well when given the opportunity. He had a couple of tackles on special teams and ran the ball well. Neither Gio nor Burkhead can play Hill's role of a primary RB. They are both complementary RBs. Peerman is another complementary guy. Could have if the Bengals selected Tyler Lockett in the second round and either Ogbuehi or Fisher in the first round instead of taking both OTs in the first two rounds. But shoulda, woulda, coulda.... RE: Bengals roster projections - XenoMorph - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 02:32 AM)BengalChris Wrote: I'm with you on Wilder. He played very well when given the opportunity. He had a couple of tackles on special teams and ran the ball well. Neither Gio nor Burkhead can play Hill's role of a primary RB. They are both complementary RBs. Peerman is another complementary guy. Wilder has shown me enough to replace peerman.... peerman might have been doing it longer... But wilder looks much better as a rb and is playing very well on special teams. Watson is a wildcard he might not make it to the PS with all the RB injures around the league. RE: Bengals roster projections - Stormborn - 08-27-2015 Williams deserves a spot over Hunt. Not even a question. RE: Bengals roster projections - Interceptor - 08-27-2015 I'm going to have to be on the Wilder bandwagon as well. RE: Bengals roster projections - XenoMorph - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 10:06 AM)Stormborn Wrote: Williams deserves a spot over Hunt. isnt williams playing DT? DL could be shaken up a bit Dunlap MJ Hunt Gilberry Hardison Carter Geno Sims Williams With Gilberry and Hardison able to slide inside. But they probly hang onto peko which pushes someone off the roster or they have carter as a line backer which push someone off there. every year there are guys we dont think will make the PS but do so who knows. RE: Bengals roster projections - bfine32 - 08-27-2015 I think we go 25 on offense and 25 on defense. So you have to add one on offense and lose one on defense. (-) Chris Carter (+) Dan France I also think Nico makes it over Lamur. The current projection has no backup Mike. RE: Bengals roster projections - Sweetness - 08-27-2015 I feel like Wilder has shined both running the ball and on special teams in his lomitted attempts. We know what we get from peerman, solid ST play and nothing as a RB. How long do you keep a player just because you know what you're getting? I also don't understand the continued love for Hunt. Dude has shown absolutely nothing other then he can't stay healthy. Would be awesome if he could turn it around, but why cut others for a guy already in what should be his prime who's doing nothing. The guy is already 28 for goodness sake. RE: Bengals roster projections - SHRacerX - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 11:10 AM)bfine32 Wrote: I think we go 25 on offense and 25 on defense. So you have to add one on offense and lose one on defense. Lamur is the best nickel package backer we have when Burfict is not on the field....and they play in nickel around 2/3rds of the snaps. There is no way Lamur doesn't make it. FWIW, Vinny Rey has filled in at Mike and so can Hawk. RE: Bengals roster projections - SHRacerX - 08-27-2015 A part of me also can't help but think they will be looking very closely at the waiver wire/practice squad WRs that become available. RE: Bengals roster projections - Stormborn - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 10:54 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: isnt williams playing DT? MJ, Geno, Peko, Dunlap, Gilberry, Hardison, Williams, Thompson/Still, Sims, Clarke, there's your 10. You wanna cut it down to 9, let go of He next worst player, Peko. 10 lineman and 7 LBs work when you have the luxury of only keeping 5 WRs when your RBs and TEs line up in the slot and sometimes outside. RE: Bengals roster projections - magikod - 08-27-2015 My only complaint is that Shawn Williams will prob get taken off our practice squad. And why should Peerman still make the team? Wilder has so much more upside. RE: Bengals roster projections - Bilbo Saggins - 08-27-2015 This roster effectively has 11 d-linemen with Carter I wouldn't be surprised if they kept Brock(the TE from last year) instead of Uzomah, or if they decided to cut Hunt for an extra WR or DE that they claim off waivers. Overall it looks pretty believable. RE: Bengals roster projections - McC - 08-27-2015 (08-27-2015, 10:02 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: Wilder has shown me enough to replace peerman.... peerman might have been doing it longer... But wilder looks much better as a rb and is playing very well on special teams. Wilder's not just big. He's got some wiggle too, which I wasn't necessarily expecting. |