Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. (/thread-16837.html) |
Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - WhoDeyLeisure - 08-31-2018 This is the world we live in. https://www.cincyjungle.com/2018/8/31/17807590/report-bengals-auden-tate-odd-man-out-at-wide-receiver-roster-cuts-cincinnati RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - bonesaw - 08-31-2018 I like both but am an FSU alum so was rooting harder for Tate RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - WhoDeyLeisure - 08-31-2018 Core has had his chances, hasn’t done anything. Tate will soon be a star...on the Ravens. Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - ochocincos - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 09:52 PM)WhoDeyLeisure Wrote: This is the world we live in. Saw this on Twitter. The team puts a priority on ST for its back-end players over offensive/defensive potential. Over the years, I’ve learned to just expect it rather than get frustrated. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Millhouse - 08-31-2018 If I had to guess depending how bad Core's back is, Core will go on IR after making the 53. Then assuming that Tate clears waivers, he will be signed as the 6th receiver, which would leave Core eligible to return after 8 weeks. This all assuming that Hobson is right on Tate on the outside looking in and Core's back needs quite some time to get better. https://www.bengals.com/news/bengals-doctoring-roster edit: OR not RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - rfaulk34 - 08-31-2018 Someone would have to be a complete moron to keep Core over Tate. Special teams, my ass. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - impactplaya - 08-31-2018 Tate isnt clearing waivers. the Colts or a WR needy team will snatch him up...especially the Colts RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Sweetness - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:10 PM)impactplaya Wrote: Tate isnt clearing waivers. the Colts or a WR needy team will snatch him up...especially the Colts Yep. Because a guy who had 5 catches in preseason is much better then the other WRs that are available. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Bilbo Saggins - 08-31-2018 Odd. Back injuries can be really bad juju - I'm surprised that they value Core to the point that they'd consider using the IR designated to return option on him. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Essex Johnson - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:08 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Someone would have to be a complete moron to keep Core over Tate. Special teams, my ass. Really so specials matter less than your 6th Wr, please explain RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - rfaulk34 - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:35 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Really so specials matter less than your 6th Wr, please explain It's stupid to take someone who has superior physical gifts and dump him because a guy who can't even make a contested catch plays special teams. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Luvnit2 - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:35 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Really so specials matter less than your 6th Wr, please explain Some fans forget special teams also has starters and 6th WR's often are not active on game day. If Tate gets cut it is because he did not get it done on special teams. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - BengalChris - 08-31-2018 If Core is injured why bother trying to fit him on the 53? It's not like he's a key component to any part of the team, including special teams. If he's missing weeks of games, he's going to be replaced at any position. No one would pick up Core if he's injured. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - J24 - 08-31-2018 He also said that they may keep 7. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - rfaulk34 - 08-31-2018 Like i said, they'd have to be complete morons to release Tate with some of the schlubs that have been kept around here too long. None of them have had his ability. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Essex Johnson - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:39 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: It's stupid to take someone who has superior physical gifts and dump him because a guy who can't even make a contested catch plays special teams. First physical ability does not mean your a good football player if that was the case why did he not show 5he ability on specials, he adds very little to our roster as 6th wr with nothing to offer us on STs. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - rfaulk34 - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:48 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: First physical ability does not mean your a good football player if that was the case why did he not show 5he ability on specials, he adds very little to our roster as 6th wr with nothing to offer us on STs. Whatever. It's a ridiculous argument to make. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Essex Johnson - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:49 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Whatever. Because you have little argument RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - impactplaya - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:28 PM)Sweetness Wrote: Yep. Because a guy who had 5 catches in preseason is much better then the other WRs that are available. how many of those catches were MEANINGFUL.as in for a 1st down conversion or TD? thats what I thought. RE: Hobson reports Tate will be cut so they can keep Core. - Luvnit2 - 08-31-2018 (08-31-2018, 10:49 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Whatever. Special team starters play about 25% of all snaps. A 6th WR who sucks at ST's plays zero snaps unless 2 or 3 guys get hurt? I am not sure why you feel your stance is superior without question. |