Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. (/thread-18194.html) |
Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - HarleyDog - 11-26-2018 Sounds like we are screwed. Paul is usually not anti-bengal. I mean, he is truthful and no Hobspin, but not normally this blunt. Good read and feel he is spot on. After Marvin Lewis's presser, I think any little faith I had remaining in him is gone. Not to mention (I'm sure Fred has stats) the defense seems even worse since he took over. Yesterday was not healthy to watch and I only was able to start watching part way through the 3rd qtr. Feel sorry for those of you who watched it for 60 minutes. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/blogs/daugherty-blog/2018/11/26/tml-browns-bengals-hue-jackson-marvin-lewis-nfl-coach-hot-seat/2112979002/ Quote:Ain't gonna change it, can't rearrange it can't stand the pain when it's all the same to you, my friend’’ RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - fredtoast - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 12:33 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Paul is usually not anti-bengal. Yes he is. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - bengalfan74 - 11-26-2018 This team is in a never ending nightmare it can't get out of. Wash, rinse, repeat Marvin Lewis should have been dismissed several times over and there's no way he should survived the meltdown in the playoffs with Pittsburgh. Yet he's still here and this team has been a charging elephant with a bullet in it's brain that doesn't realize it's dead yet ever since. And even if ML does step down Hue taking the reigns is just pure punishment for all the fans. Sets us up for another 10 years of failure, it's just miserable. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 Paul used to be extremely anti-Bengals... Well, in towns you do need media to hold teams accountable. I honestly didn't realize he was still covering the Bengals. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - Goalpost - 11-26-2018 First downs were 18-4 at one point in the 1st half. We were blown out. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - HarleyDog - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 12:38 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Yes he is. (11-26-2018, 12:46 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Paul used to be extremely anti-Bengals... I stand corrected. I guess I've not read enough of his material as of late to get the popular opinion. However, great article and pretty accurate. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 12:51 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: I stand corrected. I guess I've not read enough of his material as of late to get the popular opinion. However, great article and pretty accurate. I struggle using the term 'anti-Bengal' though as I think what he says is realistic. I feel like he really 'gets it'. But, he did seem to disappear for years. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - thompson19osu - 11-26-2018 He missed the most telling part of Baker’s quote. He also had this to say... “We have people that we believe in calling the plays now.” Our players don’t believe in ML and our HC successor didn’t even have the trust of the Cleveland Browns players. This team will be lucky to even get a 6th win this year. The 2020s here shortly will be the new 90s. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:01 PM)thompson19osu Wrote: He missed the most telling part of Baker’s quote. He also had this to say... Honestly, probably in 2 of our games we were outplayed and won on fluke defensive plays. The Dolphins game comes to mind. We are every bit the 4-5 win team that we were projected to be. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - Goalpost - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:08 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Honestly, probably in 2 of our games we were outplayed and won on fluke defensive plays. The Dolphins game comes to mind. Yea. We currently sit at 4th worst in point differential. Minus 71. We squeaked a couple out and got blasted in some games. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - sandwedge - 11-26-2018 Hue as HC might just be the tipping point for me. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:18 PM)sandwedge Wrote: Hue as HC might just be the tipping point for me. I thought that retaining Marvin would be the tipping point for the fanbase after last offseason. The new tipping point just keeps getting lower and lower. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - thompson19osu - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:08 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Honestly, probably in 2 of our games we were outplayed and won on fluke defensive plays. The Dolphins game comes to mind. Good point. Colts game is another one. We forced the fumble but the Colts were driving and had converted the 1st down on that play. There is no doubt they would have scored. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:21 PM)thompson19osu Wrote: Good point. Colts game is another one. We forced the fumble but the Colts were driving and had converted the 1st down on that play. There is no doubt they would have scored. IF we win 6-7 games I doubt that's enough for ML to get fired. Remember, if they fire him...they have to pay him the last year of his deal AND pay a new HC. We probably already have enough wins for him to retain his job. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - 3wt - 11-26-2018 “We have people that we believe in calling the plays now.” And it showed. Last week and this. The Browns now have someone running the team that knows when to cut bait and who to hand the rod to. They've been collecting some good players, they have more draft picks coming next April and they're starting to roll. I have no idea what the players think of the current coaching staff but I can only think of 3 coaches I would believe in: Simmons, Pollack and Van Pelt. I've not been a long term advocate of firing Lewis, but I am now. If we had a better person on the defensive coaching staff I'd say we need to do it today. But they need to blow the whole thing up at the end of the season. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - THE PISTONS - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:24 PM)3wt Wrote: “We have people that we believe in calling the plays now.” Pollack? He's done nothing special here. He had 4 great lineman on Dallas offensive line. He didn't make them. He inherited them. He's been kind of exposed here in my view. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - fredtoast - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:18 PM)Goalpost Wrote: We squeaked a couple out and got blasted in some games. We also lost on a td in the final seconds. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - 3wt - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:30 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Pollack? He's done nothing special here. Lap thinks a lot of the guy. And other than Boling (jury's out on Price) he had nothing to work with. Nothing. But I would not die on a hill to protect anyone at this point. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - thompson19osu - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:23 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: IF we win 6-7 games I doubt that's enough for ML to get fired. That and he has the injury bug to hang his hat on. That said it would look pretty bad to lose 8 straight games to finish off the season. RE: Paul Daugherty on Bengals. Not good. - HarleyDog - 11-26-2018 (11-26-2018, 01:23 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: IF we win 6-7 games I doubt that's enough for ML to get fired. If his contract is performance related, then maybe not. Or at least I would think so. Who wouldn't put that jargon in a coaches contract? Damn... Never mind, Mike Brown that's who. |