+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Bengals Re-signing Hart (/thread-19514.html)
Bengals Re-signing Hart - Fullrock - 03-11-2019
I mean if this is true you have got to be $*#$ing kidding me!!! Hahahaha!
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1105195474288627715?s=19
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - THE PISTONS - 03-11-2019
Hobson possible article: 'Hart of the offensive line'
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - jj22 - 03-11-2019
Our starting RT, and don't give me it means nothing lecture. That's the same thing that we were told last season and... well... he started.
3 years 21M! with no one bidding for his services?!
Fools. But we already knew that.
And Dennard is gone.
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - t3r3e3 - 03-11-2019
The Brown/Blackburn FO is the laughingstock of the NFL. Bid against themselves for a straight scrub who was cut from a team with a 30th ranked line. Only in Mike Clown’s world does this move make any sense.
Bengals Re-signing Hart - BenZoo2 - 03-11-2019
75 out 80 in pff tackle grades. It’s moves like that will keep ebenezers winless playoffs in tact
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - XenoMorph - 03-11-2019
Not for this deal.... It might be team friendly as in we can cut with little to no dead money... But I don't like it.
But who knows how it works out. he had a few decent games. If the RG play improves it should help him out too. or maybe he fits the new blocking scheme better than the old one.
Would have preferred mr shirtless 40
7 mil isn't too much for a Starting Tackle... Might be too much for B Hart... but not for a Tackle
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - Nati#1 - 03-11-2019
HART STINKS!!..WE NEED A GOD DAMN FA LINEMAN
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - J24 - 03-11-2019
(03-11-2019, 05:16 PM)jj22 Wrote: Our starting RT, and don't give me it means nothing lecture. That's the same thing that we were told last season and... well... he started.Wait how is Dennard gone?
3 years 21M! with no one bidding for his services?!
Fools. But we already knew that.
And Dennard is gone.
He should be between 8 and 9 million a year.
We supposedly had 30 million to spend on free agency we have spend 13 million so far and 9 for Dennard we would have 8 to 9 Million left.
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - Deanlj69 - 03-11-2019
(03-11-2019, 05:50 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Not for this deal.... It might be team friendly as in we can cut with little to no dead money... But I don't like it.
But who knows how it works out. he had a few decent games. If the RG play improves it should help him out too. or maybe he fits the new blocking scheme better than the old one.
Would have preferred mr shirtless 40
7 mil isn't too much for a Starting Tackle... Might be too much for B Hart... but not for a Tackle
That makes him the 9th highest paid RT in the league! Wow. If I was Wllie Anderson I would get in game shape and file reinstatement paperwork
Bengals Re-signing Hart - yellowxdiscipline - 03-11-2019
Whitworth nah, Hart yes.
This just might be the final nail on the coffin for me. I can’t handle too much of this incompetence anymore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - CarolinaBengalFanGuy - 03-11-2019
I won't lie, why can't they lowball Bobby Hart, because of all the guys we've lowballed and lost, this is one of the guys you lowball and get to keep. Although I guess you can't lowball a guy worth the minimum.
RE: Bengals Re-signing Hart - Bengalfan4life27c - 03-12-2019
His play improved over the 2nd half of last season not horrible if he plays like he did 2nd half of last season.