Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Bleacher Report Power Ranking (/thread-2273.html) |
Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Anderson HOF - 09-29-2015 Maybe I am missing something so thought I would ask for some help on Bleacher Report power ranking after week 3. It has the Bengals ranked 4th overall which i find a accurate ranking at this time of the season.. and in the ranking it shows what bleacher reporter ranked them the highest and lowest.. I am assuming they mean for week 3. So if that is true.. what does Ty Schalter have against the Bengals and why does he love Baltimore so much ? He ranked the 3-0 Bengals after defeating the 0-3 Ravens... 9th in power ranking and the Ravens 7th in power rankings. What the hell is this guy thinking ? PS The Steelers he has ranked 20th... ?? RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - YES - 09-29-2015 Media's stupid RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - fredtoast - 09-29-2015 Linc? RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Anderson HOF - 09-29-2015 HERE IS THE LINK Ravens are ranked 20th but he has them 7th .. Bengals ranked 4th but he has them 9th. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2573012-nfl-power-rankings-brs-expert-consensus-standings-heading-into-week-4 RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Blake2Pickens - 09-30-2015 (09-29-2015, 11:24 PM)Anderson HOF Wrote: HERE IS THE LINK What are u talking about? RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - M.W. - 09-30-2015 (09-29-2015, 11:13 PM)Anderson HOF Wrote: Maybe I am missing something so thought I would ask for some help on Bleacher Report power ranking after week 3. Only way that makes sense is if you account for Pig Pen being injured. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - ItsOdellThurman - 09-30-2015 Some of the metrics they use are not at all based on results and don't care about head to head. Same with player evaluation. Pro Football focus rated Aaron Rodgers a -2.0 for week 3. Yes, Aaron Rodgers with 311 yards and 5 TD's, was ranked behind Kirk Cousins, Ryan Mallett, Jameis Winston, Blake Bortles and Ryan Fitzpatrick. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Anderson HOF - 09-30-2015 (09-30-2015, 12:30 PM)ItsOdellThurman Wrote: Some of the metrics they use are not at all based on results and don't care about head to head. I don;t care what kind of metrics you use.. to rank a 0-3 team over a 3-0 team that you just lost too is unreal and not logical with any type of metric you want to use. and even if you do.. what metric do you suppose would have this guy put the Ravens above the Bengals ?? NONE. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Penn - 09-30-2015 I only spent a minor amount of time looking into this guy. He is from Michigan. Doesn't that mean he automatically hates all things Ohio? And during that very few minutes looking into Ty Shalter I discovered even though he is full time at Bleacher Report (never visited their page until now and it seems they are as much of a joke as I always heard they are) he did work for Sirius (satellite, are you serious?). But the only other news agency that I saw him getting recognition from was over a year ago, the local affiliate for CBS in.......Baltimore. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - McC - 09-30-2015 (09-30-2015, 12:44 PM)Anderson HOF Wrote: I don;t care what kind of metrics you use.. to rank a 0-3 team over a 3-0 team that you just lost too is unreal and not logical with any type of metric you want to use. and even if you do.. what metric do you suppose would have this guy put the Ravens above the Bengals ?? NONE. Especially if you are the 3-0 team and you just got done beating the 0-3 team in their place and whooped a team that also beat them. The guy opened his window when he was writing and common sense flew right out. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - McC - 09-30-2015 (09-30-2015, 12:30 PM)ItsOdellThurman Wrote: Some of the metrics they use are not at all based on results and don't care about head to head. What are they based on? Hope? Imagination? Our offense is better. Our defense is better. Our record is better. What is left? RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - PV Bengal - 09-30-2015 (09-30-2015, 05:04 PM)McC Wrote: What are they based on? Hope? Imagination? Well ... Baltimore Crab Cakes are better than Cincinnati Chili. I mean, I love Cincinnati Chili but I'd eat Baltimore Crab Cakes every time if given a choise between the two. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - ItsOdellThurman - 09-30-2015 I never said the ranking was valid, haha. I just pointed out that sometimes you will see "power rankings" that are exclusively based on statistics and metrics. They completely ignore records, head to head, how a team looks, etc. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - magikod - 09-30-2015 mind=blown RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Utts - 09-30-2015 Bengals were ranked #1 in some power rankings around this time last year. #PowerRankingsAreWothless RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - BengalChris - 10-01-2015 (09-29-2015, 11:13 PM)Anderson HOF Wrote: Maybe I am missing something so thought I would ask for some help on Bleacher Report power ranking after week 3. Maybe he read the Ravens' W-L backwards. Maybe he's Flacco's secret lover. In either case, he's a moron. RE: Bleacher Report Power Ranking - Anderson HOF - 10-01-2015 (09-30-2015, 11:59 PM)Utts Wrote: Bengals were ranked #1 in some power rankings around this time last year. #PowerRankingsAreWothless Did you actually read the post ?? this has nothing to do with where Bengals were or are.. but then again... but why should I be surprised about your lack of knowledge of a post to a specific thread |