+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: letter grades by position (/thread-2560.html)
Pages:
1
2
letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
Special teams-A. Need i say more
Quarterback-B . Would have been higher if it wasnt for the pick
Running back-C. Not alot of production this week but gio was there when it mattered.
Online-D.they gave up 4 sacks and failed to pave many running lanes
Wr-B+. They did what they needed to .if it wasnt for a holding call by whitworth in the 1st q this grade would be much higher.
Te-A+. What else can you say besides tyler eiffert is a beast,and how about that clutch catch in the 4th oh my gawd
Dline-C. 4 sacks but couldnt stop the run
Lb-C. Nothing special here ,nice play by maualuga to tip that pass nothing else stands out.cant wait for vontaze to be back
Safety-C-. The first thing that comes to mind is nelson whiffing on the thomas rawls td
Cb-C+. They really played better in the 4thq ,heres to hoping they can hold up this week against the bills
Overall a great game ,we came together as a team to get the win and im not sure you could say that of previous squads
RE: letter grades by position - XenoMorph - 10-13-2015
is this just weekly grades? I think the first 4th qtr comeback by 17 or more points in 428 games with passes pretty much on the money all day minus a few is at least A- worthy
RE: letter grades by position - Shouldamapads - 10-13-2015
Special Teams get an A when Tate ran two out to the 9 and 10?
Our QB deserves an A+, yeah he threw a pick, but he also mounted a 17 point comeback against the #2 defense.
RE: letter grades by position - Emphasis - 10-13-2015
I agree QB should be at least an A. I don't think anyone expected our offense to be totally perfect against Seattle, and given the outcome, I think Andy should be rated higher.
RE: letter grades by position - Luvnit2 - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 01:12 PM)Shouldamapads Wrote: Special Teams get an A when Tate ran two out to the 9 and 10?
Our QB deserves an A+, yeah he threw a pick, but he also mounted a 17 point comeback against the #2 defense.
AD and our pass offense shredded one of the best pass defenses in the NFL. Remove the bogus holding car on the 72 yard TD to Green and AD throws for over 400 yards against Seattle. I was shocked he got that done as before the game I predicted a rough week for the offense and thought the defense would step up and dominate this week.
I was wrong.
RE: letter grades by position - XenoMorph - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 01:12 PM)Shouldamapads Wrote: Special Teams get an A when Tate ran two out to the 9 and 10?
Our QB deserves an A+, yeah he threw a pick, but he also mounted a 17 point comeback against the #2 defense.
the coverage unit gets a A+
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
Yes,andy played a good game ,if he throws a td instead of a pick and that holding call doesnt happen it would be an a+,and the special teams is what won the game,pac man returns and nugent fgs
RE: letter grades by position - Savagehenry54 - 10-13-2015
I don't like a ticky tack hold causing the wrs to get a lower grade. Id give the receivers an A for sure.
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
That ticky tac call was the difference between aj having 70 yd rec and him having 130yds rec and a td
RE: letter grades by position - Pezmerga - 10-13-2015
How does a holding call by the Oline affect the Wide Receiver grade?
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 02:31 PM)Pezmerga Wrote: How does a holding call by the Oline affect the Wide Receiver grade?I just explained on the post before yours,that one holding call made a big difference
RE: letter grades by position - M.W. - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 01:25 PM)Savagehenry54 Wrote: I don't like a ticky tack hold causing the wrs to get a lower grade. Id give the receivers an A for sure.
I know right!
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
When i do grades its all unbiased,apparently the whole team should have gotten a++ for their efforts.some of u guys sound like dameshek trying to talk about the steelers
RE: letter grades by position - Eraserhead - 10-13-2015
You lost me when you gave Dalton a B, he is only in the top 3 in like every QB category. He needs an A+...
RE: letter grades by position - Pezmerga - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 02:43 PM)420bengalbuckeye Wrote: I just explained on the post before yours,that one holding call made a big difference
But shouldn't that reflect on the Offensive Line and not the Receivers?
I don't follow the logic...
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-13-2015
(10-13-2015, 03:17 PM)SB50Champs Wrote: You lost me when you gave Dalton a B, he is only in the top 3 in like every QB category. He needs an A+...
Right because dalton ws just lighting up the scoreboard in the 2nd and 3rd quarters,the team won today because it was a team effort,your the one saying dalton should have an an A+,and the same person calling for his head after a loss,
RE: letter grades by position - Johnny Cupcakes - 10-13-2015
Ha...I guess I understand the "420" in the username now. Let me have some of what you're smoking!
RE: letter grades by position - BoomerFan - 10-13-2015
How was the blocking from the TEs?
I love that Eiffert is doing so well, but are we getting any production out of our backups or Hewitt (I would include him in this category despite being and H-Back)?
RE: letter grades by position - 420bengalbuckeye - 10-14-2015
(10-13-2015, 04:42 PM)BoomerFan Wrote: How was the blocking from the TEs?
I love that Eiffert is doing so well, but are we getting any production out of our backups or Hewitt (I would include him in this category despite being and H-Back)?
So are you saying we should target hewiit and brock more?,eifferts too good to share targets with them
RE: letter grades by position - XenoMorph - 10-14-2015
(10-14-2015, 10:52 AM)420bengalbuckeye Wrote: So are you saying we should target hewiit and brock more?,eifferts too good to share targets with them
Brock? you mean that guy that was on the team last year?
Its Eifert, Kroft and Hewitt although hewitt hasnt had any TE snaps yet. and Uz (sp) hasnt been active to my knowledge.