Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) (/thread-27639.html)

Pages: 1 2 3


Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Mark123 - 05-02-2021

Are Oline isn't complete one more FA!!!!!


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman.... - HarleyDog - 05-02-2021

Misleading thread title with a post following like that. Do you have news or are you just reaching on your first thread?


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman.... - Mark123 - 05-02-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:33 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Misleading thread title with a post following like that. Do you have news or are you just reaching on your first thread?

Not reaching team is looking to add a guard to mentor carman. One name to keeping mind is Turner. Jordan will be cut.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - HarleyDog - 05-02-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:36 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Not reaching team is looking to add a guard to mentor carman. One name to keeping mind is Turner. Jordan will be cut.

Where are you getting this info? Please post a link or something.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - psychdoctor - 05-02-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:38 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Where are you getting this info? Please post a link or something.

It's out there in the wild ATM, something ZT insinuated.  Didn't specifically state OL.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Luvnit2 - 05-02-2021

I have been saying it for month, trade for Zac Ertz, a complete TE.

Ertz
Uzomah
Sample

One 3 down TE in Ertz, one pass catching TE with Uzomah to team with Ertz in 2 TE sets and Sample a run blocking TE to use with Ertz.

A TE is a young QB's best friend and a running game with Mixon and company helps Joe B.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Murdock2420 - 05-02-2021

(05-02-2021, 09:32 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I have been saying it for month, trade for Zac Ertz, a complete TE.

Ertz
Uzomah
Sample

One 3 down TE in Ertz, one pass catching TE with Uzomah to team with Ertz in 2 TE sets and Sample a run blocking TE to use with Ertz.

A TE is a young QB's best friend and a running game with Mixon an company helps Joe B.

What do you see on the Bengals roster that the Eagles would even want?


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - TKUHL - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 10:49 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: What do you see on the Bengals roster that the Eagles would even want?

Shame Ross is gone Wink


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Yogo - 05-03-2021

CJ for Ertz straight up?


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - EasyPeasy - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:28 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Are Oline isn't complete one more FA!!!!!

I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe? 


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Housh - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:28 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Are Oline isn't complete one more FA!!!!!

For new posters......this is what you don’t do


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - WhoDey - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:28 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Are Oline isn't complete one more FA!!!!!

"Are" Hilarious


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Luvnit2 - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 10:49 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: What do you see on the Bengals roster that the Eagles would even want?

a 2022 3rd round pick and a salary dump, they have cap issues


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - SunsetBengal - 05-03-2021

(05-02-2021, 07:28 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Are Oline isn't complete one more FA!!!!!

(05-02-2021, 07:36 PM)Mark123 Wrote: Not reaching team is looking to add a guard to mentor carman. One name to keeping mind is Turner. Jordan will be cut.

Generally, we post a link to the source of the information being shared around here.  Or, in the case of where you can't remember exactly, you can say who said it, where you heard or read it, etc.  In years gone by, so many people have spread false rumors, that the board in general typically requires some sort of authentication before they will take things serious and conversate on the topic.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - SadFaceBengal15 - 05-03-2021

(05-03-2021, 04:28 AM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe? 

Gosh there are so many squares that make up this circle of bengal fans.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - yang - 05-03-2021

It’s speculation, but we have a lot of cap room and more free agents are likely. We know we waited until after the draft so we didn’t lose the Comp pick. After drafting 4 defensive lineman we know that’s an unlikely position group.

We could still be looking at LB, WR, Oline, TE.

And I would be surprised if we didn’t add Oline to be honest.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - BigPapaKain - 05-03-2021

(05-03-2021, 04:28 AM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe? 

You probably shouldn't rag on someone's grammar if you can't spell speech.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Schmitbuck - 05-03-2021

(05-03-2021, 08:18 AM)yang Wrote: It’s speculation, but we have a lot of cap room and more free agents are likely.  We know we waited until after the draft so we didn’t lose the Comp pick.  After drafting 4 defensive lineman we know that’s an unlikely position group.  

We could still be looking at LB, WR, Oline, TE.  

And I would be surprised if we didn’t add Oline to be honest.

I agree that more free agents will likely be added. It does seem that the UDFA signings are down compared to other years. 

I understand your point about not adding a DL guy, but I think we'll still see a DT-3 technique to rotate in. I'm a little surprised they didn't draft one. I do think that the draft took away the possibility of adding Kerrigan or another edge.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - Dr.Z - 05-03-2021

With the Chiefs drafting Humphrey, it’s extremely doubtful that Austin Reiter returns to them. Could we move Hopkins to guard and play Reiter there (just throwing out there )? There’s also Osemele if he can still walk.


RE: Were about to get one more veteran Olineman (Speculation) - BritishBengal - 05-03-2021

(05-03-2021, 04:28 AM)EasyPeasy Wrote: I'm genuinely concerned that anyone with English as a first language cannot differentiate between "are" and "our." I don't even care about were/we're. Or starting a contentless thread with a bullshit title implying there's actual content. It's inconceivable. A troll? Speach-to- text gaffe? 

Preech Rock On