For Entertainment Purposes Only - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Around the NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: For Entertainment Purposes Only (/thread-29183.html) |
For Entertainment Purposes Only - SHRacerX - 11-07-2021 Since Brad and I have been regularly debating "picks" for the Bengals games (for betting purposes), I thought I would expand it to something where everyone could just make a pick or two if they like, and discuss them. The Bengals game, I don't like at all. Maybe I would play the over (which I hate betting over and unders) as I see it being a potentially high-scoring game. Here are the rest of the picks I like this week: Miami -6.5 at home against the Texans. Even Miami's defense can look good against the Texans. They are also poised for their "late season run" where they beat a few teams they shouldn't and their record improves to a respectable number....costing themselves a premier draft pick in the process. New England -3.5 at Carolina. Yes, they still have a rookie QB and it is a road game, but their defense is really good and Carolina scored 3 points and 19 points in their last two games. I hate the number, but Belichek will have a plan to get the ball out quickly and take away the strength of the Carolina defense. Won't be a super high-scoring game, but they should cover. Minnesota +6 at the Ravens. The Rats are still very tough at home, and coming off a bye, but I think the Vikes will fare better against the Rat's defense than they did at Dallas a week ago. They won't likely win, but I think they cover. Ravens defense is very suspect. Green Bay +7.5 at the Chiefs. I get it. They aren't playing Rogers. However, this is the shot Jordan Love has been waiting for and I think he will be ready for the Chiefs. He is also a lot more mobile than the shifty Rogers, and could move the chains a few times with his legs. Chiefs are a mess, and I don't see them covering that number against a really good Green Bay defense. If your site has player props, look at AJ Dillon for having a big game. I think the Packers will rely on the run early. They might even win this game. Remember, this is just for fun. I killed college football yesterday (which I usually suck at) and might regress to the mean in this weekend's NFL action. However, I feel last week was such a weird week for the NFL that a lot more sensical things happen this week. Who Dey! Enjoy the games. RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - Go Cards - 11-07-2021 Texas plus 6.5 All day long RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - TheLeonardLeap - 11-07-2021 (11-07-2021, 11:55 AM)Go Cards Wrote: Texas plus 6.5 Yup. Tyrod Taylor is not David Mills. RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - grampahol - 11-07-2021 (11-07-2021, 12:21 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Yup. Tyrod Taylor is not David Mills. He's not even Mike White.. RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - TheLeonardLeap - 11-07-2021 (11-07-2021, 12:26 PM)grampahol Wrote: He's not even Mike White.. That's Mr Mike White. Put some respect on the future GOAT's name when you type it. RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - Bengalfan4life27c - 11-07-2021 Bills -14.5 at Jags. Bills cover no problem. IMO. Thought I heard Burrow is undefeated ATS following a loss. not counting week10 of last season which he didnt finish RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - Bengalfan4life27c - 11-07-2021 (11-07-2021, 01:35 PM)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: Bills -14.5 at Jags. Bills cover no problem. IMO. Thought I heard Burrow is undefeated ATS following a loss. not counting week10 of last season which he didnt finish This didnt age well RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - SHRacerX - 11-08-2021 (11-07-2021, 11:55 AM)Go Cards Wrote: Texas plus 6.5 Nope, went 4-0. 5-0 if you count the over for the Bengals game. Allow me to take a victory lap.... RE: For Entertainment Purposes Only - SHRacerX - 11-08-2021 (11-07-2021, 06:20 PM)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: This didnt age well Mine did... |