Rule Clarification??? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Rule Clarification??? (/thread-30365.html) |
Rule Clarification??? - SHRacerX - 01-17-2022 Dak Prescott's ill-fated QB keeper that killed time is all the discussion today. I was wondering about this: What if Prescott, instead of going down, fired the ball to the sideline (though SLIGHTLY backwards) and it went out of bounds. That would be a fumble, but he would get the yardage at the place the ball went out of bounds, right? Wouldn't the clock also stop? If that is true, that might be a legitimate play in the future? RE: Rule Clarification??? - Sled21 - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:12 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Dak Prescott's ill-fated QB keeper that killed time is all the discussion today. I don't see why not RE: Rule Clarification??? - KillerGoose - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:12 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Dak Prescott's ill-fated QB keeper that killed time is all the discussion today. There is a rule preventing this exact scenario from occurring. NFL Rules 4.7.1 ILLEGAL ACTS Quote:A team is not permitted to conserve time after the two-minute warning of either half by RE: Rule Clarification??? - Nepa - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:22 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: There is a rule preventing this exact scenario from occurring. Wow. Impressive bit of knowledge. Do they say what the penalty is? Maybe a ten-second runoff? RE: Rule Clarification??? - motoarch - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:22 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: There is a rule preventing this exact scenario from occurring.KillerGoose dropping knowledge! RE: Rule Clarification??? - Bengalpool - 01-17-2022 I feel like they would've ran time off the clock for doing that..could be wrong. RE: Rule Clarification??? - fredtoast - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:12 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Dak Prescott's ill-fated QB keeper that killed time is all the discussion today. Even though it is against the rules I am giving you rep for thinking of this. RE: Rule Clarification??? - SHRacerX - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:49 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Even though it is against the rules I am giving you rep for thinking of this. First playoff win, first rep from Old Fred! Truly a breakthrough season! RE: Rule Clarification??? - SHRacerX - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:22 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: There is a rule preventing this exact scenario from occurring. Thanks man. It would be kind of fun if that rule didn't exist and Burrow busted that out to help them win a game. I still think the fake flea-flicker was one of the coolest ideas I have seen in a long time. Wonder if we won't see it again. RE: Rule Clarification??? - HarleyDog - 01-17-2022 (01-17-2022, 05:56 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: First playoff win, first rep from Old Fred! Its -190 degrees in hell. |