Inactives? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Inactives? (/thread-3052.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Inactives? - bengalguy71 - 11-05-2015 Has anyone heard who the inactive players are tonight? RE: Inactives? - XenoMorph - 11-05-2015 Andre Smith is definately 1 Dunap and Maluaga could be 2 and 3. Which if they are inactive Dawson and Hunt will be active. Mario Alford Chris Lewis Harris Uzoman RE: Inactives? - yellowxdiscipline - 11-05-2015 Dunlap plays. He was there on the final snap in Week 8 so I cant see any reason why he doesn't play. Rey and Andre will probably be out for sure. RE: Inactives? - bfine32 - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 01:45 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Andre Smith is definately 1What happened to Andre? RE: Inactives? - Thundercloud - 11-05-2015 Concussion. RE: Inactives? - XenoMorph - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 01:58 PM)Thundercloud Wrote: Concussion. yeah and with the short week not enough time to be cleared. I didnt realize he was out for our sole TD drive vs pitt RE: Inactives? - bfine32 - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 01:58 PM)Thundercloud Wrote: Concussion. (11-05-2015, 01:59 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: yeah and with the short week not enough time to be cleared. Thanks I missed that one. Hope Winston can contain Kruger. Luckily he's been having a terrible year. RE: Inactives? - Thefinalcut813 - 11-05-2015 Haden Whitner McCown Hawkins Hartline OUCH! 2 or so for us seems like nothing right now compared to the Browns. RE: Inactives? - XenoMorph - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:12 PM)Thefinalcut813 Wrote: Haden dang so they have like 2 WRs left and 1 CB.. RE: Inactives? - tigershrimp - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:12 PM)Thefinalcut813 Wrote: Haden It's a "careful what you wish for" scenario.... Young scrubs trying to make bones on national primetime TV? Ugh. The antidote is simple: BRING DA NOISE! Loud 'n proud, homers! Harass Manziel right back into rehab. :hail: RE: Inactives? - yellowxdiscipline - 11-05-2015 I hope you guys aren't gleaming over the Browns inactives thinking were gonna run them over.... Keep in mind a guy named Rawls came out of no where and shredded our defense back in Week 5. There could be a Rawls lying at any offensive position on that Browns roster. My guess would be we cover the WR's good, but Barnidge gives us fits. We let washed up Heath Miller have his best game of the season on us last week, which brings back the "we cant cover tight ends" issue to the table. Its not going to be a blow out like everyone is expecting. RE: Inactives? - fredtoast - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:37 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: My guess would be we cover the WR's good, but Barnidge gives us fits. We let washed up Heath Miller have his best game of the season on us last week, which brings back the "we cant cover tight ends" issue to the table. Who cares if the TE got some yards. Overall our pass defense was great against the Steelers. There is no team in the league that we are going to completely shut down. So it doesn't matter if one single player gets some yards as long as our pass defense as a whole is doing well. RE: Inactives? - yellowxdiscipline - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:45 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Who cares if the TE got some yards. Overall our pass defense was great against the Steelers. Oh im with you Fred... Id rather let Barnidge have success underneath our secondary, then let Bowe and Benjamin beat us deep. If im picking a poison it would be the TE. Letting them run all over us is just going to lead to bigger issues like gassing the defense, and giving up big plays deep is going to zap the defenses confidence. RE: Inactives? - spazz70 - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:49 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: Oh im with you Fred... Id rather let Barnidge have success underneath our secondary, then let Bowe and Benjamin beat us deep. If im picking a poison it would be the TE. Letting them run all over us is just going to lead to bigger issues like gassing the defense, and giving up big plays deep is going to zap the defenses confidence. Exactly what we did against Pitt and Miller had a good game because of it...Yet in the earlier post you complained about it... Maybe that was the plan? Just maybe? RE: Inactives? - yellowxdiscipline - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 03:03 PM)spazz70 Wrote: Exactly what we did against Pitt and Miller had a good game because of it...Yet in the earlier post you complained about it... Maybe that was the plan? Just maybe? Not complaining just forecasting a possibility. We have a good defense, but its far from perfect. Covering tight ends has always been somewhat of a weakness. RE: Inactives? - Bengal Dude - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 01:38 PM)bengalguy71 Wrote: Has anyone heard who the inactive players are tonight? The list is usually posted about an hour before the game. RE: Inactives? - ItsOdellThurman - 11-05-2015 Rawls didn't come out of nowhere. He went over 100 yards the game before the Bengals. RE: Inactives? - XenoMorph - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 05:18 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: Not complaining just forecasting a possibility. We have a good defense, but its far from perfect. Covering tight ends has always been somewhat of a weakness. im fine with barnage getting a few fantasy points RE: Inactives? - kevin - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 01:38 PM)bengalguy71 Wrote: Has anyone heard who the inactive players are tonight? Andre Smith per Bengals.com Wednesday......Dunlap and Maualuga are questionable, which is better than out or doubtful. They both practiced this week. Look for them to suit up and be ready to go. RE: Inactives? - OrlandoBengal - 11-05-2015 (11-05-2015, 02:45 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Who cares if the TE got some yards. Overall our pass defense was great against the Steelers. Exactly. I would have much rather Miller have his best game of the season versus Brown and Bryant running free all day. |