+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Around the NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: So much for the Packers (/thread-3145.html)
So much for the Packers - StLucieBengal - 11-08-2015
Getting murdered at the moment
37-14
RE: So much for the Packers - Joelist - 11-08-2015
Yup. Letting the worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports walk all over them.
I would be embarrassed if I were a Packer fan, as the pass coverage and the run defense were both beyond atrocious.
RE: So much for the Packers - fredtoast - 11-08-2015
Don't know what their defense did today, but they had given up over 500 yards in each of their last two games.
RE: So much for the Packers - grampahol - 11-08-2015
Stranger yet is the Titans are only a game out of first place and could possibly be in the playoffs .. 2-6.
RE: So much for the Packers - bengalfan74 - 11-08-2015
They had me fooled, I thought they were a decent team.
Rodgers was under full blown assault today ! No defense, no O-line. They're not that good.
RE: So much for the Packers - Awful Llama - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 07:31 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: They had me fooled, I thought they were a decent team.
Rodgers was under full blown assault today ! No defense, no O-line. They're not that good.
Yeah, NFCN title looked like a lock for the Pack, but Zim and his boys are right there. Thought Minny might snag a wildcard spot, maybe, but the division title is now up for grabs and could come down to that Minny/GB tilt at Lambeau January 3.
RE: So much for the Packers - StLucieBengal - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 08:43 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: Yeah, NFCN title looked like a lock for the Pack, but Zim and his boys are right there. Thought Minny might snag a wildcard spot, maybe, but the division title is now up for grabs and could come down to that Minny/GB tilt at Lambeau January 3.
Great, would love to see the NFC Bengals win
RE: So much for the Packers - Atomic Orange - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 06:47 PM)Joelist Wrote: Yup. Letting the worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports walk all over them.
I would be embarrassed if I were a Packer fan, as the pass coverage and the run defense were both beyond atrocious.
+5 Rep says that worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports will be rated above us in power rankings this week. Is it a bet? :snark:
RE: So much for the Packers - Awful Llama - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 08:51 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: +5 Rep says that worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports will be rated above us in power rankings next week. Is it a bet? :snark:
Well, they have Superman at QB and we just have Jimmy Olsen
RE: So much for the Packers - BonnieBengal - 11-08-2015
The Vikings are now tied with the Packers in their division at 6-2. The Vikings would be the last team I would want to face in the Super Bowl, as Zimmer knows our defense inside and out.
RE: So much for the Packers - MrRager - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 06:47 PM)Joelist Wrote: Yup. Letting the worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports walk all over them.
I would be embarrassed if I were a Packer fan, as the pass coverage and the run defense were both beyond atrocious.
I think you're forgetting the 9-0 Chiefs from a couple years back.
RE: So much for the Packers - StLucieBengal - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 09:49 PM)BonnieBengal Wrote: The Vikings are now tied with the Packers in their division at 6-2. The Vikings would be the last team I would want to face in the Super Bowl, as Zimmer knows our defense inside and out.
They lost bridgewater today so we will see.
Carolina is winning ugly. I kept thinking the cards were the best team in the NFC but it may very well be Carolina: They play a physical brand of football.
I wanted an Andy vs Carson super bowl but I would also like to see an Andy vs Cam as well.
RE: So much for the Packers - BonnieBengal - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 10:02 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: They lost bridgewater today so we will see.
Carolina is winning ugly. I kept thinking the cards were the best team in the NFC but it may very well be Carolina: They play a physical brand of football.
I wanted an Andy vs Carson super bowl but I would also like to see an Andy vs Cam as well.
Bridgewater just has a concussion, so shouldn't be out too long. I'd rather face Palmer in the SB. We bring a lot of pressure and he doesn't handle it well.
RE: So much for the Packers - bengalfan74 - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 09:49 PM)BonnieBengal Wrote: The Vikings are now tied with the Packers in their division at 6-2. The Vikings would be the last team I would want to face in the Super Bowl, as Zimmer knows our defense inside and out.
Agree, but I'd still love to see Zim and the Vikes be successful !
RE: So much for the Packers - bengalfan74 - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 10:02 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: They lost bridgewater today so we will see.
Carolina is winning ugly. I kept thinking the cards were the best team in the NFC but it may very well be Carolina: They play a physical brand of football.
I wanted an Andy vs Carson super bowl but I would also like to see an Andy vs Cam as well.
Perhaps I'm wrong but I'm still not convinced Carolina is a Super Bowl contender. I think they're very beatable.
RE: So much for the Packers - IsaacCurtis - 11-08-2015
Of course Carolina Isn't A SB contender.That won't happen
RE: So much for the Packers - StLucieBengal - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 10:12 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Perhaps I'm wrong but I'm still not convinced Carolina is a Super Bowl contender. I think they're very beatable.
They are a fragile contender. At some point someone will stop their running game. And force Ginn to beat them. Which he won't do consistently enough.
Minnesota and Arizona are actually bad match ups for Carolina. Especially Minny.
RE: So much for the Packers - Joelist - 11-08-2015
(11-08-2015, 08:51 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: +5 Rep says that worst undefeated team in the history of professional sports will be rated above us in power rankings this week. Is it a bet? :snark:
Seeing as the sports media worships Scam Newton I wouldn't be surprised. To be honest had we been playing the Packers we would have hung 50+ on that atrocious defense.
RE: So much for the Packers - BonnieBengal - 11-09-2015
(11-08-2015, 10:08 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Agree, but I'd still love to see Zim and the Vikes be successful !
Me too, but not as successful as us.
