Fred Johnson re-signed - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Fred Johnson re-signed (/thread-31567.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Fred Johnson re-signed - pally - 03-14-2022 1 year $2.4 million RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - TecmoBengals - 03-14-2022
RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Schmitbuck - 03-14-2022 Didn't see that one happening. Hope he doesn't see the field outside of the preseason. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - kalibengal - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:11 PM)pally Wrote: 1 year $2.4 million the big splash FA signing we all have been waiting for! but seriously, I do like Fred at T not G, good move RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - TecmoBengals - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:13 PM)Schmitbuck Wrote: Didn't see that one happening. Hope he doesn't see the field outside of the preseason. Or blowouts when we're up 42-7 against the Browns, Ravens, and Steelers. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Soonerpeace - 03-14-2022 https://twitter.com/jaymorrisonath/status/1503390376714981383?s=21 RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - casear2727 - 03-14-2022 Not sure how this is a good sign whatsoever.....? RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Nicomo Cosca - 03-14-2022 I like him better for OT depth than Prince, so I’m good with it. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Bengalbug - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:24 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Not sure how this is a good sign whatsoever.....? I believe it’s a no risk tag. We could cut him later and owe him nothing. #Bengals tendering Fred Johnson, as @AdamSchefter tweeted, changes little. He's undrafted, so there would be no compensation if another team made an offer. His one-year, $2.43M tender is not guaranteed. Bengals on hook for nothing if cut. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - casear2727 - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:26 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: I believe it’s a no risk tag. We could cut him later and owe him nothing. Good point. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - CJD - 03-14-2022 ... ... ...Why? He'd be OT5 at best, behind Williams, our new starting FA RT, Isaiah Prince and D'Ante Smith. Not a great use of cap space to give your 5th OT 2.4 million. I guess they could just cut him if they decide he isn't needed. Makes him a high probability cut in training camp unless he really balls out. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Soonerpeace - 03-14-2022 Jay Morrison In a season where the O-line was the biggest liability, Johnson was inactive 10 times and appeared in just five games. He didn't even crack the starting lineup in Week 18 at Cleveland when all the regulars sat. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - phil413 - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:26 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: I believe it’s a no risk tag. We could cut him later and owe him nothing. This is good. In light of them being able to cut him even tomorrow if they were tight on cap room there is no downside to this move. I really hope people get that instead of saying "his" 2.43M could have been the difference between keeping Hopkins and landing a better center for instance. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 03-14-2022 This is so stupid. He barely played last year and was often inactive, even after Reiff got hurt. He is OT #4 at best, behind Jonah, Reiff, and Prince. Probably also behind Smith & Adeniji, who have more versatility. And that is before FA. This does not bode well for re-signing Reiff, or picking up a RT in FA. No guaranteed $$, so we can bail if we have to. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - THE PISTONS - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:24 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Not sure how this is a good sign whatsoever.....? Yeah. He can be waived with no cap hit. I'd rather use this money elsewhere. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - bfine32 - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:41 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: This is so stupid. He barely played last year and was often inactive, even after Reiff got hurt. He is OT #4 at best, behind Jonah, Reiff, and Prince. Probably also behind Smith & Adeniji, who have more versatility. And that is before FA. I seriously doubt they gave this kid a 1-yr no guarantees tender with the intention of him being our starting RT. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - Bengalpool - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 12:24 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Not sure how this is a good sign whatsoever.....? Terrible. News is one of our AFCN foes were looking to sign him. Bengals probably being petty by placing this tender tbh. Not like he can beat out Prince so wtf. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - XenoMorph - 03-14-2022 I guess Some Body is better than No Bodies RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - CardCounterChris - 03-14-2022 Wasted 2.4M. If he ever sees the field its an immediate problem. Surely there was someone at league minimum to sit on the bench, who might be able to block in a game. RE: Fred Johnson re-signed - THE PISTONS - 03-14-2022 It's kind of funny that Rosenhaus is his agent. I guess he has some smaller name guys too. |