+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: What the (/thread-34209.html)
What the - Cosmokramer - 12-27-2022
I’ll admit, I don’t follow this stuff as close to some. But from past history, have the bengals ever done this? I know this is all theory and what ifs. But seriously??
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/bears-trade-back-no-2-133603162.html
RE: What the - KillerGoose - 12-27-2022
(12-27-2022, 11:24 AM)Cosmokramer Wrote: I’ll admit, I don’t follow this stuff as close to some. But from past history, have the bengals ever done this? I know this is all theory and what ifs. But seriously??
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/bears-trade-back-no-2-133603162.html
Yeah, this is strange. I don't think we are seeing a team trade away the 2nd for the 28th for anything less than Joe Burrow.
RE: What the - Garrus - 12-27-2022
No player is worth giving all that up for unless it is a QB, which we already have. This is stupid.
RE: What the - NUGDUKWE - 12-27-2022
Just someone trying to be creative with the draft. No way the Bengals would do something like this. I wish we were at the point of just needing one impact player. But I think by the time the draft rolls around we will need several positions.
RE: What the - Forever Spinning Vinyl - 12-27-2022
I don't even think of the draft when the playoffs are afoot!
RE: What the - Synric - 12-27-2022
The thing that sticks out to me is the value of Tee Higgins in this trade is around a top 10 pick.
I've seen a couple people talk about this mock and each went opposite ways on Tee's value. One said the Bengals would need to work in a future first to offset value. The other said the Bengals gave up too much and didnt need to give up the second round pick.
RE: What the - PhilHos - 12-27-2022
I mean, i could see us trading Higgins for a good draft pick, but there's no way we give up him AND all those draft picks unless there's a generational talent at #2 but at a position we could use one at .
RE: What the - bengalfan74 - 12-27-2022
That doesn't sound anywhere in the galaxy of a Bengals move. Highly doubt it
RE: What the - SunsetBengal - 12-27-2022
(12-27-2022, 11:39 AM)PhilHos Wrote: I mean, i could see us trading Higgins for a good draft pick, but there's no way we give up him AND all those draft picks unless there's a generational talent at #2 but at a position we could use one at .
In this hypothetical scenario, the Bengals could always leverage that #2 pick for a ton of draft capital on, or leading up to draft night.
RE: What the - pally - 12-27-2022
That is a ridiculous trade
RE: What the - Synric - 12-27-2022
Will Anderson looks like a game breaking edge defender but both Trey and Will would play the right side...
Lol add possibly trading Trey Hendrickson for a couple first round picks to this scenario and the Bengals would come out looking like geniuses.
RE: What the - XenoMorph - 12-27-2022
Nope not happening... Would take several more 1st round picks to move that far up.
RE: What the - kurisu - 12-27-2022
That sounds like nothing the Bengals would do, guy must be a Bears fan.
RE: What the - Interceptor - 12-27-2022
When did Forrest Gump become the Bears GM?
RE: What the - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 12-27-2022
(12-27-2022, 11:24 AM)Cosmokramer Wrote: I’ll admit, I don’t follow this stuff as close to some. But from past history, have the bengals ever done this? I know this is all theory and what ifs. But seriously??
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/bears-trade-back-no-2-133603162.html
The Bears are at #2 and don't need a QB. A half game away from #1, and the Texans have been very competitive 3 weeks in a row (Cowboys, OT loss to Chiefs, W vs Titans). They are gonna be entertaining all types of trade back scenarios and their media will make up senseless stuff.
RE: What the - BFritz21 - 12-27-2022
I saw that and it's stupid.
We'll want picks to build around Burrow and the defense, so no way we give up that much, especially for a defender.
I see why they think we'll trade Higgins because he's a free agent after next year, so he'll want a new contract this year and so will Burrow, so they think we'll trade Higgins instead of giving both extensions, but I don't think we trade Higgins.
RE: What the - Stewy - 12-27-2022
#1 WRs like Higgins have been going for 2-3 1st round picks and getting massive contract to boot. Even Madden wouldn't agree to this dumb ass trade. Might trade Higgins straight up for the #2 pick, then trade back and turn into several picks and draft a top WR + others.
This would be an idiot trade as is for the Bengals. Was this written by a Bears fan?
RE: What the - XenoMorph - 12-28-2022
(12-27-2022, 10:19 PM)Stewy Wrote: #1 WRs like Higgins have been going for 2-3 1st round picks and getting massive contract to boot. Even Madden wouldn't agree to this dumb ass trade. Might trade Higgins straight up for the #2 pick, then trade back and turn into several picks and draft a top WR + others.
This would be an idiot trade as is for the Bengals. Was this written by a Bears fan?
yeah written by a bears fan. (their version of CincyJungle)
But never address why the hell bengals would want to move to 2 overall