+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class (/thread-35468.html)
TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - ochocincos - 04-18-2023
Listing out some of the main TEs in this draft class with number of receiving snaps, run blocking snaps, pass blocking snaps.
Mayer - 346 receiving, 390 run blocking, 12 pass block
Washington - 266 rec, 373 RB, 32 PB
Kincaid - 384 rec, 281 RB, 17 PB
LaPorta - 311 rec, 289 RB, 11 PB
Schoonmaker - 199 rec, 309 RB, 18 PB
Strange - 264 rec, 312 RB, 34 PB
Whyle - 304 rec, 278 RB, 28 PB
Durham - 480 rec, 327 RB, 53 PB
When looking at PFF grades, here were the guys above who had the top 3 ratings for each category:
Receiving Grade: Kincaid (91.8), Mayer (91.6), LaPorta (85.3)
Run Block Grade: Mayer (82.0), Washington (81.3), Whyle (69.5)
Pass Block Grade: Schoonmaker (79.6), Washington (78.4), Strange (76.7)
RE: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - OSUfan - 04-18-2023
How can you state this is a list of the main TEs in this draft without including one considered higher than most of your list in Tucker Kraft?
RE: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - ochocincos - 04-18-2023
(04-18-2023, 05:19 PM)OSUfan Wrote: How can you state this is a list of the main TEs in this draft without including one considered higher than most of your list in Tucker Kraft?
Because he's FCS so I didn't have those snap counts.
Also, I said SOME of the main TEs, not all. Calm your t*ts.
EDIT - I was able to find. What was showing to me did not include any FCS, so I had to add SDSU.
155 receiving snaps (76.6 rec grade), 215 run block snaps (69.6 rb grade), 13 pass block snaps (72.5 pb grade)
RE: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 04-19-2023
(04-18-2023, 02:38 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Listing out some of the main TEs in this draft class with number of receiving snaps, run blocking snaps, pass blocking snaps.
Mayer - 346 receiving, 390 run blocking, 12 pass block
Washington - 266 rec, 373 RB, 32 PB
Kincaid - 384 rec, 281 RB, 17 PB
LaPorta - 311 rec, 289 RB, 11 PB
Schoonmaker - 199 rec, 309 RB, 18 PB
Strange - 264 rec, 312 RB, 34 PB
Whyle - 304 rec, 278 RB, 28 PB
Durham - 480 rec, 327 RB, 53 PB
When looking at PFF grades, here were the guys above who had the top 3 ratings for each category:
Receiving Grade: Kincaid (91.8), Mayer (91.6), LaPorta (85.3)
Run Block Grade: Mayer (82.0), Washington (81.3), Whyle (69.5)
Pass Block Grade: Schoonmaker (79.6), Washington (78.4), Strange (76.7)
Great informative most. Is Kuntz at Old Dominion FCS as well? Would like to see Musgrave, though the snaps are limited.
For me, with the Smith signing, I think Mayer or Washington are the best options. We want a guy who can block.
RE: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - ochocincos - 04-19-2023
(04-19-2023, 03:19 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Great informative most. Is Kuntz at Old Dominion FCS as well? Would like to see Musgrave, though the snaps are limited.
For me, with the Smith signing, I think Mayer or Washington are the best options. We want a guy who can block.
Old Dominion is FBS now (Sun Belt).
Kuntz - 114 receiving snaps, 11 pass block snaps, 75 run block snaps
No PFF grade for any of REC, PB, or RB were 70+
Musgrave - 50 receiving snaps, 6 pass block snaps, 54 run block snaps
Bad blocking grades in those limited snaps, but solid receiving grade (79.2)
I didn't include him though because of his very limited snaps.
RE: TE snap distribution - 2023 draft class - bfine32 - 04-19-2023
(04-18-2023, 05:19 PM)OSUfan Wrote: How can you state this is a list of the main TEs in this draft without including one considered higher than most of your list in Tucker Kraft?
How can you be such a tool? If you want to add Kraft's data to those submitted feel free.
I personally like to see Whylie, but I'm not going to disparage the data the OP took time to provide.