All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Rival Talk (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals (/thread-4762.html) |
All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - GMDino - 01-15-2016 http://steelerswire.usatoday.com/2016/01/15/all-the-fines-given-and-not-given-in-steelers-win-over-bengals/ Quote:The NFL issued fines on six players between the Bengals and Steelers — three on each side — for their parts in a variety of infractions in the AFC wild card playoff game last weekend. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - GMDino - 01-15-2016 I still haven't seen or heard what Foster did to warrant a flag let alone a fine...but I guess it is what it is. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - XenoMorph - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 05:38 PM)GMDino Wrote: I still haven't seen or heard what Foster did to warrant a flag let alone a fine...but I guess it is what it is. Wasnt he the guy attacking burfict on the ground? Also Hills knee was down.... gotta find out how much the steelers pay the refs so we can at least match. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - GMDino - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 06:08 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Wasnt he the guy attacking burfict on the ground? That was DeCastro. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Belsnickel - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 06:08 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Also Hills knee was down.... gotta find out how much the steelers pay the refs so we can at least match. Not enough evidence to overturn on the replay. Ball could have been loose before his knee hit the ground, or after, too many bodies in the way to be certain and so the play stands. So neener neener. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 05:38 PM)GMDino Wrote: I still haven't seen or heard what Foster did to warrant a flag let alone a fine...but I guess it is what it is. He kicked Burfict in the ankle after Burfict kicked him in the ankle. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - 6andcounting - 01-15-2016 Is Gilberry's fine related to bumping into porter or something else? RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Bengalzona - 01-15-2016 I'm satisfied. It was about what I expected, except I didn't see the Foster thing. The Steelers coaches had their wrists slapped. That is good enough for me. The Vontazebufict boogieman has been spanked. The rest of the football world is happy... at least for three games. Adam Jones had an appropriate fine... not for what he did on the field that night, but for all the stupidazz comments he twitted afterwards about Brown. Rational people are happy. Watch out. The NFL might start looking at these rivalry games as real moneymakers! RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - StLucieBengal - 01-15-2016 So when burfict's suspension is reduced to a fine or just 1 game how upset will people get? It should only be a fine. I hope this offseason they sort out the hitting thing. Only hits leading with the head should be called. And all these should be reviewable. Also found it interesting that blandino said the Bryant catch wasn't a catch. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - cinci4life - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 07:55 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So when burfict's suspension is reduced to a fine or just 1 game how upset will people get? Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought he was in New York to help the replay officials during the playoffs. If so, where the hell was he on that one??? RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - CKwi88 - 01-15-2016 I read the explanation, and read the rule, and I still don't get why Shazier's hit was not a penalty nor fined. Oh well. Would love to hear an explanation as to why the Shawn Williams hit was a foul. It is what it is, I think that all parties need to put it behind them and stop this kind of embarrassment from happening again. I also fully expect these "hit to the head" plays to become reviewable in the future. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - 6andcounting - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 08:17 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: I also fully expect these "hit to the head" plays to become reviewable in the future.It's Goodell and the NFL, so don't get your hopes up. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - GMDino - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 06:47 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: He kicked Burfict in the ankle after Burfict kicked him in the ankle. This? Ridiculous. (01-15-2016, 07:27 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Is Gilberry's fine related to bumping into porter or something else? Bumping porter. (01-15-2016, 07:55 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So when burfict's suspension is reduced to a fine or just 1 game how upset will people get? It may be reduced. My guess is two games. He's a repeat offender not just of hit during play but also of stuff AFTER the play. That's why it wasn't just a fine. Could you link where Blandino said it wasn't a catch? I've checked his twitter feed and haven't seen the officiating video yet. (01-15-2016, 08:14 PM)cinci4life Wrote: Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought he was in New York to help the replay officials during the playoffs. If so, where the hell was he on that one??? He was there. That's why I curious that Lucy saw this and no one else has. (01-15-2016, 08:17 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: I read the explanation, and read the rule, and I still don't get why Shazier's hit was not a penalty nor fined. Oh well. Would love to hear an explanation as to why the Shawn Williams hit was a foul. It is what it is, I think that all parties need to put it behind them and stop this kind of embarrassment from happening again. The only explanation I heard that makes any sense was that Shazier didn't leave his feet. That's all I got. I wish they were reviewed. A lot of bang-bang get called that are not. EDIT: Found another thread about Blandino. He didn't say it "wasn't a catch". He said it may have not been a catch but there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call. I quoted the article in the other thread here. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - 6andcounting - 01-15-2016 Since dingleberry was fined for bumping porter, he should have been flagged as well. Those two would have offset. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Belsnickel - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 10:12 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Since dingleberry was fined for bumping porter, he should have been flagged as well. Those two would have offset. This plays into what I have said all along. During that fiasco, the refs were too lenient on everyone in that area. They gave them a lot of rope for some reason and then Jones just crossed the line that shall never be crossed. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - 6andcounting - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 10:28 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: This plays into what I have said all along. During that fiasco, the refs were too lenient on everyone in that area. They gave them a lot of rope for some reason and then Jones just crossed the line that shall never be crossed. Yeah, regardless of everything, Jones' action was the outlier that stuck out. RE: All the fines given, and not given, in Steelers' win over Bengals - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 01-15-2016 (01-15-2016, 09:37 PM)GMDino Wrote: This?I didn't say it made sense. But yeah, I concur. Foster was the only one who got flagged and the original replay only showed Foster's reactions. |