+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD (/thread-4821.html)
Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016
League confirms. Steelers should have been up 22 to 0.
Stop crying about it. Game never should have been close enough to win.
We got dominated
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Brownshoe - 01-17-2016
It wasn't a legal hit though. You can't hit someone with the crown of the helmet out of the tackle box.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - rfaulk34 - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:29 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: League confirms. Steelers should have been up 22 to 0.
Stop crying about it. Game never should have been close enough to win.
We got dominated
Play was whistled dead. No advancement of the ball allowed regardless of "legality" of the call.
You're dismissed.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - leonardfan40 - 01-17-2016
No hit was not legal per NFL rule book. Blandino can say whatever he wants but it's pretty clearly a foul. Shoulda been 1st down for the bengals.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:29 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: League confirms. Steelers should have been up 22 to 0.
Stop crying about it. Game never should have been close enough to win.
We got dominated
Except the league also said the TD catch wasn't a TD. So no, the score shouldn't have changed if you wanna be all troll-ish about it. Plus whistling it dead means the play is over, regardless of if it helps or hurts you.
Also they only said the hit was legal due to some "lining up" bullshit that isn't even in the rulebook. By the rule itself, it's an illegal hit.
They also fined Joey Porter, so that should have been a penalty, making it a 50 yarder in the rain at worst, a 65 yarder in the rain at best.
Nice try, closet Steelers fan. GTFO Jungle Noise.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - NATI BENGALS - 01-17-2016
Should have been a 15 yard penalty we would have been in the red zone. Bryant TD wasnt a TD. Williams penalty wasn't a penalty. All would have altered the results in our favor.
If that was Burfict hitting a Steelers RB like Shazier hit Gio I would bet everything I have that they would have thrown a flag.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - HarleyDog - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:29 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: League confirms. Steelers should have been up 22 to 0.
Stop crying about it. Game never should have been close enough to win.
We got dominated
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Joelist - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:29 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: League confirms. Steelers should have been up 22 to 0.
Stop crying about it. Game never should have been close enough to win.
We got dominated
Stop with the "we". We (the actual Bengals fans) figured out a while ago that you are not a Bengals fan. So you can stop the trolling.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - The Real Deal - 01-17-2016
Rule 12, Section 2, Article 8: “It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both are clearly outside the tackle box.”
In just a few hours you will disappear from here and go off crying into your terrible towel. My guess is halfway through the game you will already have pooped in your Ben roethlisberger underwear.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - J24 - 01-17-2016
How does this guy still have an account?
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016
It was not a penalty
Bernard fumbled
Clear recovery
Pittsburgh TD. The refs botched it by blowing the whistle.
Facts hurt
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BeepBeepWoo - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:42 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: I like to put men in my mouth
GAY
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - McC - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:40 PM)J24 Wrote: How does this guy still have an account?
It is a head scratcher.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - The Real Deal - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:40 PM)J24 Wrote: How does this guy still have an account?
Mods, Please don't ban him yet. Please let us see him disappear after Pittsburgh gets stomped today. Already on its way by the way.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016
Lol, now I'm an apparent steelers fan
You poor morons are so mentally fragile.
Can't fathom a Bengal fan who isn't an ignorant homer. We suck
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - BeepBeepWoo - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:46 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: Lol, now I suck any man with a fiver
Stop giving us a play by play
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Shake n Blake - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:36 PM)Joelist Wrote: Stop with the "we". We (the actual Bengals fans) figured out a while ago that you are not a Bengals fan. So you can stop the trolling.
(01-17-2016, 06:40 PM)J24 Wrote: How does this guy still have an account?
We're just having fun with him at this point.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Murdock2420 - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:46 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: Lol, now I'm an apparent steelers fan
You poor morons are so mentally fragile.
Can't fathom a Bengal fan who isn't an ignorant homer. We suck
Let's try living in the real world for a second...I know that will be hard for you, but give it a chance.
"We suck" - The team was 12-4 and lost by 2 points in the rain with some very curious calls to say the least. No, the team does not suck, but yes the team did lose the game.
Mentally fragile - If you feel that everyone here is so "mentally fragile" it shows that you have no self esteem or self worth since you are here seeking validation from those same people.
The league can spin it anyway they want on the hit was "legal" but it is an empty phrase when you read the article and hear the same guy say it's "legal" then go on to say but these are the hits we want to remove from the game...... Tell me again how a "legal" hit is one you want out of the game. It's called saving face, that is all the league is doing.
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - Blake2Pickens - 01-17-2016
Nfl confirms, Bernard hit legal.
But let me guess NFL and the league is colluding vs the poor little bengals.
Lol, psychopath fans
RE: Shaziers hit was legal, should have been a TD - masonbengals fan - 01-17-2016
(01-17-2016, 06:46 PM)Blake2Pickens Wrote: Lol, now I'm an apparent steelers fan
You poor morons are so mentally fragile.
Can't fathom a Bengal fan who isn't an ignorant homer. We suck
No it's just you.