(04-27-2016, 12:35 PM)3wt Wrote: I found this on MSN this morning.   I thought it was in many ways the most accurate mock I've seen.   Has us taking William Jackson III.   Let me know what you think.



http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/40-nfl-experts-mock-drafts-combined-into-one/ar-BBsi5Oa?li=BBnb7Kz 

• Bosa to JAX when it states the Jags would rather land a CB or LB there...and then Myles Jack is taken one pick later.
• Treadwell to TEN when it states they need help on both OL and DL...and then Taylor Decker going 3 picks later. Decker actually would fit well with TEN as he's had to protect mobile QBs at Ohio St.
• Lee to DET when it states that MLB is far more of a need...only to have Ragland taken a pick later.
• Apple to NYJ when it states that the Jets would be very unlikely to actually take Apple anyway.
• Doctson to SEA when it states he doesn't really fit in the Seahawks scheme...this mock just thinks Doctson should go in the early to mid 20's range.
  

(04-27-2016, 01:18 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I guess I view it differently than you, as there are numerous instances where the article mentions a team would be much more likely to focus on another position, but they slot that team with taking a player outside of that position (or positions). Almost like the entire mock is comprised of BPA regardless of need.

Examples:

• Bosa to JAX when it states the Jags would rather land a CB or LB there...and then Myles Jack is taken one pick later.
• Treadwell to TEN when it states they need help on both OL and DL...and then Taylor Decker going 3 picks later. Decker actually would fit well with TEN as he's had to protect mobile QBs at Ohio St.
• Lee to DET when it states that MLB is far more of a need...only to have Ragland taken a pick later.
• Apple to NYJ when it states that the Jets would be very unlikely to actually take Apple anyway.
• Doctson to SEA when it states he doesn't really fit in the Seahawks scheme...this mock just thinks Doctson should go in the early to mid 20's range.