(10-23-2016, 05:49 PM)J24 Wrote: It was his wrist but I think it was precautionary that he sat down at end of game.

(10-23-2016, 05:53 PM)Camdaddy08 Wrote: Bengals Home Page said chest 

(10-23-2016, 05:57 PM)fredtoast Wrote: So just like a few people around here have been saying.....

No heart.

(10-23-2016, 06:01 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I saw Eifert on the sideline telling him to suck it up and get back in the game

(10-23-2016, 05:47 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Update?

I didn't get to watch the game.

Usually I at least listen, but was occupied most of the time today.

(10-23-2016, 06:48 PM)2MinutesHate Wrote: You didn't watch the game but you're saying that the fans booing had nothing to do with Marvin deciding to throw the ball at the end of the first half instead of continuing to run it in an effort to run out the clock? 

Now THAT'S  some serious intuition!  

(10-24-2016, 11:59 AM)kevin Wrote: He grabbed his hand and wrist area as soon as he hit and in pain. ....Video show him grabbing his hand......It is clear to see we need him. He is our Elliott...He runs with power as Bernard and Burkhead can not. ....Announcers said over the last few years he is the best RB in NFL at scoring touchdowns.  ....Hopefully he can play against Washington. With 4 losses on the season already, we pretty much have to win each week. We don't have the luxury of resting people for the bye week.  This team is crazy anyway. I've seen players get hurt in the bye-week practices on this team.

(10-25-2016, 08:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: So if I had watched the game I would have heard Marvin claim his decision was based on the crowd noise?

Did I miss Marvin running on the field and calling a time out when the fans started booing?  Because best I can tell that never happened.

What exactly would I have seen that would have proved Marvin made his decision based on the fans booing?

(10-25-2016, 09:41 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: While I know we can never truly know what is going on in Marvin's head, it was pretty clear while watching it.

Marvin was content going in 14-10...

(10-25-2016, 11:04 PM)2MinutesHate Wrote: Oh ya, he wasn't even trying to move the ball at all with those 2 straight runs up the middle.   The fans go batshit, start booing, then all the sudden he calls a timeout?  Head scratcher there.  Hell, AJ and Andy probably told him to quit being such a you know what...

(10-23-2016, 05:47 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Update?

I didn't get to watch the game.

Usually I at least listen, but was occupied most of the time today.

(10-25-2016, 11:48 PM)tlotharw Wrote: This explains a lot.

(10-25-2016, 11:13 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I thought Hue called the time out, not Marvin.

(10-26-2016, 01:17 AM)Go Cards Wrote: Marvin run straight up the middle showing no intent to try after not calling a TO with 1:50 on clock allowing them to take a delay of game before punting and running it down to 1:25. 

Then after Hue seen he was not truying he called TO thinking he would get ball back with several ticks left. 

Not sure if fans booing (which they were) or fact that he got his feelings hurt when Hue showed he would try to score if Bengals did not get 1st down is what changed his mind. 

But he certainly looked content going into halftime without a 2 minute offense being run until both happened.