+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Nelson and Jones (/thread-9596.html)
Pages:
1
2
Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
Well Reggie and Marvin are still 0 fors in playoff games. They both must have felt right at home just like they never left!
RE: Nelson and Jones - Big Boss - 01-08-2017
To be fair, Nelson and the Raiders as a whole were in a really shitty QB situation.
RE: Nelson and Jones - magikod - 01-08-2017
I'm really missing Nelson.
Williams and his late hits are getting old.
RE: Nelson and Jones - Trademark - 01-08-2017
Nelson was in a bad situation but Jones disappeared half of the year ai wouldn't be surprised if the Lions can him, at least Sanu knows what a divisional round feels like
RE: Nelson and Jones - Nicomo Cosca - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 02:32 AM)Big Boss Wrote: To be fair, Nelson and the Raiders as a whole were in a really shitty QB situation.
We were missing our star QB in the playoffs last year too. I didn't hear anyone making excuses for us.
RE: Nelson and Jones - HarleyDog - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 05:49 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: We were missing our star QB in the playoffs last year too. I didn't hear anyone making excuses for us.
How could anyone make excuses? We won the game and then gave it away. QB wasn't the reason we lost.
RE: Nelson and Jones - Nicomo Cosca - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 09:50 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: How could anyone make excuses? We won the game and then gave it away. QB wasn't the reason we lost.
No, but he didn't exactly light it up either. He only put up 16 points. If the Raiders get a pass for Carr being out so should we.
RE: Nelson and Jones - SunsetBengal - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:03 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: No, but he didn't exactly light it up either. He only put up 16 points. If the Raiders get a pass for Carr being out so should we.
It also wasn't the Raiders fifth consecutive one and done, in a row, or their seventh in eleven years. Harley is right, we had that game won, and gave it back.
RE: Nelson and Jones - SHRacerX - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:23 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote:
Right, because the Raiders had not been close to being a part of the postseason over that time.
BTW, did anyone else notice Amari Cooper? What the hell happened to that disinterested turd? He was gawd-awful and looked like he could care less if he caught a ball or not? Two catches for 19 yards? Great work, Cooper. I felt bad for Cook in this game.
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 05:49 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: We were missing our star QB in the playoffs last year too. I didn't hear anyone making excuses for us.
You beat me to the punch NC!!
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 09:50 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: How could anyone make excuses? We won the game and then gave it away. QB wasn't the reason we lost.
You're missing the point HD. If Carr doesn't go down they probably get a first round bye, just like last year with the Bengals. If Dalton doesn't go down, great, great chance that Pittsburgh game would have never been played, because of a first round Bengal bye.
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 05:14 AM)Trademark Wrote: Nelson was in a bad situation but Jones disappeared half of the year ai wouldn't be surprised if the Lions can him, at least Sanu knows what a divisional round feels like
Let's see if he and Leon can avoid the 0 fors club.
RE: Nelson and Jones - jfkbengals - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 02:32 AM)Big Boss Wrote: To be fair, Nelson and the Raiders as a whole were in a really shitty QB situation.
At least they had time to prepare for the game without the starter and didn't have to do it after the first offensive snap.
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:39 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: At least they had time to prepare for the game without the starter and didn't have to do it after the first offensive snap.
??? Bengals had 3 games to prepare as well.
RE: Nelson and Jones - jfkbengals - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:46 AM)bengalguy71 Wrote: ??? Bengals had 3 games to prepare as well.
1/8/2006
Really referencing the "Raiders as a whole" thing.
RE: Nelson and Jones - HarleyDog - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:39 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: At least they had time to prepare for the game without the starter and didn't have to do it after the first offensive snap.
You must be referring to the Palmer injury?
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:53 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: 1/8/2006
Really referencing the "Raiders as a whole" thing.
Gotcha jfk, my bad.
RE: Nelson and Jones - jfkbengals - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:56 AM)bengalguy71 Wrote: Gotcha jfk, my bad.
Nope, I should've been more clear about it.
RE: Nelson and Jones - Big Boss - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:03 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: No, but he didn't exactly light it up either. He only put up 16 points. If the Raiders get a pass for Carr being out so should we.
There is a pretty substantial difference between the Bengals playing their second-string backup QB, who had the benefit of three consecutive starts leading up to the playoff game, and the Raiders playing their third-string QB as a starter for the very first time.
RE: Nelson and Jones - bengalguy71 - 01-08-2017
(01-08-2017, 11:58 AM)Big Boss Wrote: There is a pretty substantial difference between the Bengals playing their second-string backup QB, who had the benefit of three starts prior to the playoff game, and the Raiders playing their third-string QB for the very first time as a starter.
I can't remember squat sometimes, did the second get hurt, or was Del Rio not happy with the seconds play and decided to start number 3?