Posts: 14,996
Threads: 121
Reputation:
47888
Joined: May 2015
Location: Hyborea
You are missing a branch off of "I believe Tee Higgins is a #1 WR". Off of Yes you need one that says "The offense Burrow ran in college and the one Taylor wants to run needs 2 #1 caliber WR". The Yes branch would go to Chase.
Posts: 6,543
Threads: 88
Reputation:
45423
Joined: Apr 2017
I'm not really in anybody's camp. I just know we are going to get a very good young player. I won't be upset with whoever we take. You can make the case for any of them. Even if we pass on a position in rd1 we can get a good player in rd2 or 3.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(04-01-2021, 09:25 PM)sandwedge Wrote: I'm not really in anybody's camp. I just know we are going to get a very good young player. I won't be upset with whoever we take. You can make the case for any of them. Even if we pass on a position in rd1 we can get a good player in rd2 or 3.
Yeah even I will say that Chase will likely be a very good player. Not worried about that at all.
Just worried that (a) we only have Reiff tied up for one year, (b) our interior line still looks bad, © our recent track record of taking linemen later in the draft is very poor, and (d) we only have one football for Chase, Higgins, Boyd and Mixon.
Not only that, but most Big Boards have Sewell above Chase, and it's a bigger need, so it just seems silly to pass.
I'm not trying to hate on anyone for their opinion though.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.