Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No Love for UC?
(12-31-2021, 07:08 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: I hope this game doesn't turn into "why the G5 doesn't belong ever" conversation.

I think that's coming regardless of the final score
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
Ridder is playing awful.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
Surprised Bama didn't call a TO to prevent a hail mary attempt here.
[Image: hFcJI4.png]
Reply/Quote
Time for some major journalistic jargon halftime adjustments.  
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:08 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: I hope this game doesn't turn into "why the G5 doesn't belong ever" conversation.

Yeah, I agree. I’m not a UC or Bama fan, but with UC’s resume I think they deserved a shot. There is just a pretty clear athlete advantage in the trenches for Bama. A Bama blow out is what I expected, but that doesn’t mean that Cincinnati shouldn’t have had a chance.
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:18 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: Yeah, I agree. I’m not a UC or Bama fan, but with UC’s resume I think they deserved a shot. There is just a pretty clear athlete advantage in the trenches for Bama. A Bama blow out is what I expected, but that doesn’t mean that Cincinnati shouldn’t have had a chance.

I'm also not a UC fan, but was happy they made it this far. I just hope future considerations for G5 schools aren't ignored if this game gets ugly.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:14 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: Time for some major journalistic jargon halftime adjustments.  

Hoping they have some good adjustments and get back in it.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
Alabama has TE's the size of Cincinnati's Defensive Tackles.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:18 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: Yeah, I agree. I’m not a UC or Bama fan, but with UC’s resume I think they deserved a shot. There is just a pretty clear athlete advantage in the trenches for Bama. A Bama blow out is what I expected, but that doesn’t mean that Cincinnati shouldn’t have had a chance.

The semifinals are almost always lopsided regardless of teams.

2020 Semifinals: 31-14 and 49-28
2019 Semifinals: 63-28 and 29-23
2018 Semifinals: 45-34 and 30-3
2017 Semifinals: 54-48 and 24-6
2016 Semifinals: 24-7 and 31-0
2015 Semifinals: 37-17 and 38-0
2014 Semifinals: 59-20 and 42-35

That is only 3 out of 14 that have been 2 score (16pt) games or less.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
Honestly surprised they didn't go for it. FGs are not going to cut it.
[Image: hFcJI4.png]
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:48 PM)cinci4life Wrote: Honestly surprised they didn't go for it. FGs are not going to cut it.

Couldn't come away with 0 points.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
Running game is unstoppable
Reply/Quote
Nice stop by the D though
Reply/Quote
That is why using your only WR as a returner is dangerous.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote
17-6 isnt as bas as I was expecting...but lets get some points here
Reply/Quote
(12-31-2021, 07:52 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Couldn't come away with 0 points.

Either way your down 2 scores and it was only 4th and 5. Sorry but you gotta go for it there.
[Image: hFcJI4.png]
Reply/Quote
These 3 and outs are no bueno
Reply/Quote
Get that stop here
Reply/Quote
Feel like bama could put backups out there, and UC would still struggle on offense
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
HUGE!
____________________________________________________________

[Image: 9c9oza.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)