(10-24-2022, 12:42 PM)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: For the last 16 games The Bengals have either Won or lost within 1 possession. What is so hard to understand? They could win 45 to nothing streak would continue lose 20 to 10 streak would end.
For those that don't understand...(and that was me for a while)...
Over the last 16 games...we've either Won...or when we lost that loss was by 8 points or less. ie We lost by 1 possession or less. So we didn't get blown out.
(10-25-2022, 11:36 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: For those that don't understand...(and that was me for a while)...
Over the last 16 games...we've either Won...or when we lost that loss was by 8 points or less. ie We lost by 1 possession or less. So we didn't get blown out.
That poster chose the most convoluted way possible to try and explain this. All he had to say was the Bengals haven’t lost a game by more than one score in X amount of games.
(10-25-2022, 11:36 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: For those that don't understand...(and that was me for a while)...
Over the last 16 games...we've either Won...or when we lost that loss was by 8 points or less. ie We lost by 1 possession or less. So we didn't get blown out.
The difference that formatting can make.
"We have won or lost by less than by one possession for 16 games in a row."
OR
"Over the last 16 games we have either won, or lost by less than one possession."
(10-24-2022, 12:42 PM)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: For the last 16 games The Bengals have either Won or lost within 1 possession. What is so hard to understand? They could win 45 to nothing streak would continue lose 20 to 10 streak would end.
lol
WFT are you smokin', man?
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
(10-25-2022, 11:36 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: For those that don't understand...(and that was me for a while)...
Over the last 16 games...we've either Won...or when we lost that loss was by 8 points or less. ie We lost by 1 possession or less. So we didn't get blown out.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
(10-26-2022, 01:07 AM)J24 Wrote: We're on Pace for 29 sacks on defense but yet we're 10th in pressure so far.
We're great in coverage by being 3rd in pass completion, 3rd in ypa, and 4th in QB Rating. However we only have 5 INTs so far this season.
(10-26-2022, 01:26 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: And those are all by a LB and 2 safeties. You have to think the CB’s get a couple eventually. Maybe Hilton or CTB.
Also goes to show just how good we are on defense. We're not getting a lot of sacks or INTs, but we're still just flat out stopping opposing offenses (relatively speaking)
(10-25-2022, 11:36 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: For those that don't understand...(and that was me for a while)...
Over the last 16 games...we've either Won...or when we lost that loss was by 8 points or less. ie We lost by 1 possession or less. So we didn't get blown out.
Wow, I feel a lot better now. I thought my reading comprehension finally failed me for good. I don't know how many times I read that and nothing clicked.
"Our offensive line is going to surprise a lot of people" - Mike Brown (7-26-21)
(10-25-2022, 01:22 PM)Bengalfan4life27c Wrote: Another ironic stat Joe Burrow passed Jacoby Brissett on the all time passing yardage list to move to 213th all time.
That will be an on-going duel since they're both active.
Joe Burrow ERUPTED for 481 yards through the air, while the #Bengals almost had 3 different receivers eclipse 100-yards receiving. @CoachKyleCaskey breaks down the film from this offensive masterpiece and discusses how sustainable this output is.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: 3b48c503-a269-443b-a5e6-e48beb5af1fb_text.gif]](https://y.yarn.co/3b48c503-a269-443b-a5e6-e48beb5af1fb_text.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)
