Posts: 673
Threads: 8
Reputation:
2849
Joined: Apr 2021
(03-22-2023, 01:39 PM)RunKijanaRun Wrote: I don't know....Jonah +, probably, but Pitts is coming off an injury and has been completely ignored in Atlanta.
I'd bet more teams would rather have the RT than the 2023 Kyle Pitts.
Granted, I agree we'd win the trade, but the Falcons have hideously managed that commodity.
Isn’t it crazy Atlanta passed on chase? It’s like chase wasn’t even in their consideration, it was always Pitts.
Posts: 19,649
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85166
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-22-2023, 03:44 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: it's an ESPN ideal scenario thing.
I'm not sure it's even true.
Becton played in 1 game over the past 2 years because of injuries.
Posts: 1,117
Threads: 44
Reputation:
5880
Joined: Mar 2017
(03-22-2023, 03:10 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I hope this is just a rumor. Would rather have a decent draft pick
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm gonna go out on the proverbial limb and say I'd do a one to one trade. Maybe even give conditionals?
Becton needs a new scenery and still lowers the cap hit. The ONE year he did play, it was for Pollack so at least he has someone that can comment on his ability.
I look at it this way, he will be healthy to start the season (assuming he doesn't have Eifert luck) and he's on a final year so it doesn't preclude us from getting any OTs in the draft we like. Even if he gets hurt, you have to hope it'll be late enough for LC to return.
Posts: 2,979
Threads: 27
Reputation:
16709
Joined: Jan 2022
(03-22-2023, 03:22 PM)Ell Prez Wrote: Isn’t it crazy Atlanta passed on chase? It’s like chase wasn’t even in their consideration, it was always Pitts.
If you check back to the time of the draft with Chase, you will find some on this board that were advocating for Pitts over Chase. That is, once you weed through all the Sewell over Chase and "the Bengals are idiots if they pick Chase with Sewell available."
Posts: 5,633
Threads: 18
Reputation:
20346
Joined: Apr 2020
It is not even a rumor, it is just pure made up crap from ESPN.
Posts: 16,414
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61627
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 03:51 PM)Nepa Wrote: If you check back to the time of the draft with Chase, you will find some on this board that were advocating for Pitts over Chase. That is, once you weed through all the Sewell over Chase and "the Bengals are idiots if they pick Chase with Sewell available."
What would pitts numbers be like with Burrow compared to Chase with (whoever their QB is or was)
Things we will never know
Posts: 10,265
Threads: 180
Reputation:
24925
Joined: May 2015
If the Jets kid is a RT i cannot imagine a better scenario. Unless of course he sucks
Then I’d rather just get a 3rd
-Housh
Posts: 7,775
Threads: 854
Reputation:
127786
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio
(03-22-2023, 05:44 PM)Housh Wrote: If the Jets kid is a RT i cannot imagine a better scenario. Unless of course he sucks
Then I’d rather just get a 3rd
He's only played 1 game in the last 2 years, but did have a 74.4 grade as a rookie...for whatever that's worth.
Posts: 1,637
Threads: 11
Reputation:
3790
Joined: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Becton is all about potential. If we're complaining about jonahs durability, then Becton should be looked at in a very negative light.
Posts: 7,135
Threads: 50
Reputation:
49019
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 05:44 PM)Housh Wrote: If the Jets kid is a RT i cannot imagine a better scenario. Unless of course he sucks
Then I’d rather just get a 3rd
Becton played LT as a rookie. He was a complete stud as a rookie, but has only played one game the last two seasons due to injury.
Posts: 38,628
Threads: 914
Reputation:
130458
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 03:51 PM)Nepa Wrote: If you check back to the time of the draft with Chase, you will find some on this board that were advocating for Pitts over Chase. That is, once you weed through all the Sewell over Chase and "the Bengals are idiots if they pick Chase with Sewell available."
I was one; Pitts was a unicorn. Wonder what Chase would look like having Mariotta, Ridder, and a washed-up Matt Ryan throwing to him?
Folks hold lack of TDs against Pitts. Is that really his fault?
Posts: 673
Threads: 8
Reputation:
2849
Joined: Apr 2021
(03-22-2023, 03:51 PM)Nepa Wrote: If you check back to the time of the draft with Chase, you will find some on this board that were advocating for Pitts over Chase. That is, once you weed through all the Sewell over Chase and "the Bengals are idiots if they pick Chase with Sewell available."
I remember quite well. But I’m shocked Atlanta didn’t even consider chase, it seems like they were always gonna go Pitts.
Posts: 4,405
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13588
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 05:58 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I was one; Pitts was a unicorn. Wonder what Chase would look like having Mariotta, Ridder, and a washed-up Matt Ryan throwing to him?
Folks hold lack of TDs against Pitts. Is that really his fault?
The argument was that they already had Higgins and Boyd so they didn’t need another WR. They made the right choice because all things being equal the stud WR is a better pick than the stud TE.
Who knows how good Kelce would be if the Chiefs had Justin Jefferson and Tee Higgins? He just wouldn’t get nearly the number of targets that he does. He’d still be great but wouldn’t have those stats.
Sure Chase greatly benefits from being on the Bengals but he was the better pick for sure. Pitts reminds me a little of Vernon Davis - another freak athlete who was supposed to be a unicorn TE. He was a good player who had a few great seasons but it’s guys like Kittle and Kelce who are the HOFers.
I will always be thankful to Atlanta for taking the wrong guy.
Posts: 245
Threads: 57
Reputation:
999
Joined: Aug 2019
Drafting a TE to run WR routes - what is the expected production difference vs. drafting a WR? Still has the potential to be a great TE but that was a boneheaded draft pick. I don't think its fair to judge him based on last season though - sounds like the team is poorly run/terrible offense.
Posts: 17,144
Threads: 237
Reputation:
134361
Joined: Oct 2015
(03-22-2023, 06:15 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: The argument was that they already had Higgins and Boyd so they didn’t need another WR. They made the right choice because all things being equal the stud WR is a better pick than the stud TE.
Who knows how good Kelce would be if the Chiefs had Justin Jefferson and Tee Higgins? He just wouldn’t get nearly the number of targets that he does. He’d still be great but wouldn’t have those stats.
Sure Chase greatly benefits from being on the Bengals but he was the better pick for sure. Pitts reminds me a little of Vernon Davis - another freak athlete who was supposed to be a unicorn TE. He was a good player who had a few great seasons but it’s guys like Kittle and Kelce who are the HOFers.
I will always be thankful to Atlanta for taking the wrong guy.
The argument wasn't that they didn't need another WR. It was that they needed OL to protect their surgically repaired QB MORE than they needed another WR.
Burrow had just gotten his knee rebuilt because of a season where he had terrible protection getting sacked 32 times in 10 games and the Bengals were going into the 2021 season with an OL of...
Jonah Williams (coming off being on the IR in both of his 2 NFL seasons)
Quinton Spain (out of the NFL after 2021)
Trey Hopkins (out of the NFL after 2021)
Xavier Su'a-Filo (out of the NFL after 2021)
Riley Reiff (33-year-old who was injured for 6 straight years)
____________________________________________________________
The 2021 season Super Bowl was over 1,000 days ago.
Posts: 5,982
Threads: 65
Reputation:
38688
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 05:31 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: It is not even a rumor, it is just pure made up crap from ESPN.
I really despise articles like that. They make it out to be a reasonable possibility. Anyone with half a brain can tell the rumor is about as valid as some shit I'd make up at a fantasy draft.
Posts: 1,950
Threads: 10
Reputation:
10578
Joined: Apr 2020
(03-21-2023, 06:21 PM)clawsout Wrote: ......Thoughts on a trade with N E for Jonah ?.......we get a 4th.....AND Reiff........Reiff would give us solid depth....plus the 4th....
.....
Reiff is a solid but not great player. He would be good depth but at 5 million? That's too much. If the Bengals had wanted Reiff they could have went after him as a free agent this year before New England signed him. I think the Bengals will look to other options. I will say Reiff was a valuable part of the team in their 2021 Super Bowl run. Its too bad he didnt get to play in the Super Bowl.
Posts: 1,109
Threads: 0
Reputation:
2516
Joined: Sep 2016
Location: Reno, Nevada
(03-22-2023, 02:53 PM)bengals67 Wrote: They should tell people no trade without a mid to low 1 and then settle for a 2.
There is no reason for the bengals to trade him if they don’t get enough value back to replace him in draft. That might be using our 1 for a RT and two 2s for a TE and CB.
He is going to play hard in a contract year or his value will be nothing next year.
If someone is dumb enough to trade a second they must be really desperate. Ide be stoked if we got anything for him.
Posts: 1,873
Threads: 117
Reputation:
11829
Joined: May 2015
(03-22-2023, 08:01 PM)ah5 Wrote: If someone is dumb enough to trade a second they must be really desperate. Ide be stoked if we got anything for him.
No not really. He is not a terrible LT but he has struggled with injuries. He is a middle of the road LT but if you do not have a LT that certainly holds some value. To make out otherwise is just silly.
Posts: 19,649
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85166
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-22-2023, 08:18 PM)OSUfan Wrote: No not really. He is not a terrible LT but he has struggled with injuries. He is a middle of the road LT but if you do not have a LT that certainly holds some value. To make out otherwise is just silly.
That's the issue. Supposedly not many teams need a LT now. And not many have cap space.
So to trade a decent pick, they'd want to extend him...and with his injury history...I doubt that happens.
|