Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moss restructures final year of contract
#41
(Yesterday, 03:12 PM)J24 Wrote: They were all different type of RBs though. Moss and Perine do the same thing as 3rd backs.

Perinne is a long term pro, has never been a starting caliber back. But Moss started for us in 2024 and his stats are much better than Sam. I love Sam, but he is a 3rd down back, I think a good one, but I would be very concerned if Brown went dowb and we obnly had Perrine to carry the load for weeks or the rest of teh season.

I see as a 3rd down back, I see moss capable of being a 3 down RB.if needed.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote
#42
(Yesterday, 07:24 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: But Moss started for us in 2024 and his stats are much better than Sam.

I see as a 3rd down back, I see moss capable of being a 3 down RB.if needed.

Are we just ignoring that Moss ran for 3.3ypc (if qualified, would be 41st out of 42 RBs with 40th being .3ypc better) and a pathetic 1.0 yards after contact (if qualified, would be 42nd out of 42 RBs with 41st being 0.6 yards better)?

Moss wasn't just bad, he was EXTRMELY bad last year. There wasn't just a gap, but a gulf between him and anyone even slightly resembling a starting caliber RB.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: bensack.gif]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#43
(Yesterday, 11:56 AM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Don't like it. Zack Moss was supposed to be a great pass protector and he wasn't even good at it last season before he went down.

We can do better, this Draft has tons of talent at RB and I was hoping to take a RB mid to late, but this might make this not happen.

so a part of a year, cancels multiple years, if we did that thinking we be cutting people left and right, i rather keep him and invest a pick on a higher need, give me a CB or even a TE over a late round RB
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#44
I don't think that he'll make it out of camp.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
Reply/Quote
#45
(11 hours ago)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Are we just ignoring that Moss ran for 3.3ypc (if qualified, would be 41st out of 42 RBs with 40th being .3ypc better) and a pathetic 1.0 yards after contact (if qualified, would be 42nd out of 42 RBs with 41st being 0.6 yards better)?

Moss wasn't just bad, he was EXTRMELY bad last year. There wasn't just a gap, but a gulf between him and anyone even slightly resembling a starting caliber RB.

I think Mixon showed in Texas he was a very good RB. Yet, if I recall without lookig it up, he has a bad YPC average and rushing TD average when a Bengal.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote
#46
(9 hours ago)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: I don't think that he'll make it out of camp.

I hope you are wrong, he just got a great guaranteed contract for 2025 when he had a little guarantee prior.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
 Please use 2025 free agency to fix the trenches, not the draft!!!!!!!!
Reply/Quote
#47
I feel its important to consider HOW a RB is used - first, second or third down.

As a runner, he was brought here to deploy in between tackle first down runs, which for a lack of a better term, are cannon fodder runs to establish a pattern in play calling.

He is not Edgerin James or Marshall Faulk, but if with better interior blocking he gets us in 2nd and 6 situations, he will have done his job.

He is a veteran with a year of familiarity in our system, who can catch and block

I am not arguing against other board members, but just making a point that there is value in having him on the roster this year. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)