***Week 10 GameDay Thread...Bengals @ Giants***

[TSwigZ]

(11-14-2016, 11:45 PM)Joelist Wrote: And the crud continues. Three missed tackles on the TE.

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)zygrot24 Wrote: Wow not even a protest from Marvin

Need our timeouts and we only have one challenge I'd say there was a 96% chance that woulda stayed incomplete

[Joelist]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)JumboTron Wrote: Eh, he was bobbling it when he hit the ground.  That's going to be called incomplete every time in this day and age.

Except in the playoffs where this same crew gave the Stealers an undeserved TD on a similar type of play.

[Atomic Orange]

If only...we could finish those.

[reuben.ahmed]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: He almost missed that

At least he made it.  :andy:

[*PhilHos*]

Bernard took less steps in the playoff game and this crew ruled it a fumble.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

[Stonyhands]

Exact same, I mean exact same play was ruled a TD for Pittsburgh when they played us. Since it was a scoring play it was even reviewed and ruled a Td. Not even a challenge from Marvin.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

Ball through Eifert's hands in the endzone. Boyd drops a ball that could have been another TD.

This game could look significantly different if those two balls are held onto and Marvin actually has his team hustle for a 2 minute drill to get a FG. Could be looking at a 31-14 game.

[StoneTheCrow]

Marvin folds with 3 of a kind and goes all in with 2 pair.

[Browns Town Bengal]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)PhilHos Wrote: 2 feet down before getting hit is no longer a catch?

Also nice to see Lewis is too much of a ***** to challenge that.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

WHile I agree marvin is a *****, i dont agree that he shouldve challenged it.  That would be a near guaranteed loss

[grampahol]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)Tomkat Wrote: If we were the Steelers that would've been a TD!

No..they would have automatically called them Superbowl winners on game 9 of the season ..

[bengals73]

I sure would like to see pick 6 ..

[Trademark]

Team is starting to show fire

[Since82]

Nice special teams play. Defense can step up.

[reuben.ahmed]

(11-15-2016, 12:31 AM)Stonyhands Wrote: Exact same, I mean exact same play was ruled a TD for Pittsburgh when they played us.  Since it was a scoring play it was even reviewed and ruled a Td.  Not even a challenge from Marvin.

But that's Pittsburgh. They start the year +4 wins due to refs

[Thefinalcut813]

He didn't do a front flip before bobbling it. That's why.

[Browns Town Bengal]

(11-15-2016, 12:30 AM)Joelist Wrote: Except in the playoffs where this same crew gave the Stealers an undeserved TD on a similar type of play.

Which play?  

[*bfine32*]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)PhilHos Wrote: 2 feet down before getting hit is no longer a catch?

Also nice to see Lewis is too much of a ***** to challenge that.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

He only has one left and would have lost that one

[impactplaya]

Boyd needs to hold on to that ball secure it better
I would have sent LaFell on that route anyhow

[Froob]

(11-15-2016, 12:29 AM)WildCat Wrote: yeah i don't understand how that's not ruled a TD as the ball breaks the plane b4 he loses possession.

Because at the time of Boyd being hit, he was considered a receiver and he must maintain possession all the way through the catch. If Boyd catches it and makes a football move (who knows what this means), then he is considered a runner and wouldn't have to maintain possession through the catch if he crosses the plane while in possession. 

I saw Boyd take two steps before he got hit. I think it is up to the discretion of the ref to determine if that is considered a football move or not. Someone correct me if I am wrong. 

[Browns Town Bengal]

(11-15-2016, 12:32 AM)bfine32 Wrote: He only has one left and would have lost that one

I dont agree with bfine often but I do in this case