Posts: 39
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2017
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2017/defense-and-pass-pressure-2016
First of all they point out that even though sacks are big, pressuring a QB without getting a sack is also very important to a defense. QBs under pressure average 2 yards less per attempt, had their completion percentage drop by almost 25 points, and see their TD to INT ration cut in half.
The Bengals were able to generate "pressure plays" on 30.8% of opponents pass plays. That ranked 6th in the league, but was not that far behind the #1 Bronco's 32.2%. The Colts were last in the league with only 19.0%.
Next the looked at the teams' defensive efficiency (DVOA) "with pressure" compared to "without pressure". The bigger the difference the more a teams pass defense depends on the pass rush. The bengals ranked 18th in DVOA difference which means they are pretty much average.
Finally they ranked each teams "Pressure percentage" based on the number of rushers. They broke it down into 3 catagories "Three or fewer", "four", and "five or more". The Bengals were the second best team in the league in getting pressure with 3 or fewer, seventh when rushing 4, and fourth when rushing 5 or more. The Panthers and eagles were the only other teams to rank in the top 10 in all three catagories. But these numbers might be a little misleading. For example the Eagles were #1 in pressure percentage while rushing 3 or fewer with an incredible 77.8%, but they only rushed 3 or fewer a total of nine plays all year. So take these numbers with a grain of salt.
Posts: 19,115
Threads: 235
Reputation:
177760
Joined: May 2015
Very interesting. Marv has always been stronger in defensive knowledge and sure he is knee deep in the defense. He sucks at offense and until he has an OC that is able to run with it and teach Marv at the same time, we are always going to be stronger on D and pretty ok on O.
Posts: 11,823
Threads: 707
Reputation:
54872
Joined: Jun 2015
(06-23-2017, 07:07 PM)Dr. Bombay Wrote: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2017/defense-and-pass-pressure-2016
First of all they point out that even though sacks are big, pressuring a QB without getting a sack is also very important to a defense. QBs under pressure average 2 yards less per attempt, had their completion percentage drop by almost 25 points, and see their TD to INT ration cut in half.
The Bengals were able to generate "pressure plays" on 30.8% of opponents pass plays. That ranked 6th in the league, but was not that far behind the #1 Bronco's 32.2%. The Colts were last in the league with only 19.0%.
Next the looked at the teams' defensive efficiency (DVOA) "with pressure" compared to "without pressure". The bigger the difference the more a teams pass defense depends on the pass rush. The bengals ranked 18th in DVOA difference which means they are pretty much average.
Finally they ranked each teams "Pressure percentage" based on the number of rushers. They broke it down into 3 catagories "Three or fewer", "four", and "five or more". The Bengals were the second best team in the league in getting pressure with 3 or fewer, seventh when rushing 4, and fourth when rushing 5 or more. The Panthers and eagles were the only other teams to rank in the top 10 in all three catagories. But these numbers might be a little misleading. For example the Eagles were #1 in pressure percentage while rushing 3 or fewer with an incredible 77.8%, but they only rushed 3 or fewer a total of nine plays all year. So take these numbers with a grain of salt.
Thanks for the facts and info
I can see our defense being top 5 in 2017 with Billings healthy, Minter and the added DE's Lawson and Willis. I am hoping our pass rush becomes scary and we get back to a great 8 man DL rotation we had in the past
I am so ready for 2024 season. I love pro football and hoping for a great Bengals year. Regardless, always remember it is a game and entertainment.
Posts: 17,160
Threads: 237
Reputation:
134528
Joined: Oct 2015
(06-23-2017, 07:15 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Very interesting. Marv has always been stronger in defensive knowledge and sure he is knee deep in the defense. He sucks at offense and until he has an OC that is able to run with it and teach Marv at the same time, we are always going to be stronger on D and pretty ok on O.
What's really interesting is that the Bengals pretty much sucked for 5 years on D under Marvin until Zimmer came in. I'm 100% convinced Paul G is a Zimmer product rather than a Lewis product.
____________________________________________________________
The 2021 season Super Bowl was over 1,000 days ago.
Posts: 19,115
Threads: 235
Reputation:
177760
Joined: May 2015
(06-23-2017, 09:35 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: What's really interesting is that the Bengals pretty much sucked for 5 years on D under Marvin until Zimmer came in. I'm 100% convinced Paul G is a Zimmer product rather than a Lewis product.
Hope you are right or I will punch you in the face. Lol, jk.
Posts: 39
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2017
Start a thread about us having a good pass rush last year and within three posts no one is saying anything about our pass rush and instead are just making this another "Marvin sucks" thread.
Interesting group of posters around here.
Posts: 3,124
Threads: 75
Reputation:
19563
Joined: Feb 2017
(06-23-2017, 11:50 PM)Dr. Bombay Wrote: Start a thread about us having a good pass rush last year and within three posts no one is saying anything about our pass rush and instead are just making this another "Marvin sucks" thread.
Interesting group of posters around here.
We were. You don't like it, leave
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posts: 2,077
Threads: 28
Reputation:
9660
Joined: May 2015
Location: North Appalachia
This is really interesting, because my eyeballs told me that for the past couple of seasons the only guys doing really well on the D-line were Atkins and Dunlap. Maybe we were spoiled by MJ's breakout year and expect pure gas across the board?
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(06-24-2017, 04:05 AM)Bilbo Saggins Wrote: This is really interesting, because my eyeballs told me that for the past couple of seasons the only guys doing really well on the D-line were Atkins and Dunlap. Maybe we were spoiled by MJ's breakout year and expect pure gas across the board?
Thank you. When you watched the games, you didn't see much pressure when it was really needed from just the front four. That was the result of a number of things:
MJ largely ineffective as a pass rusher
Billings injury led to Peko playing 90% of snaps
LBs couldn't cover, leading to easy check downs
Dunlap and Atkins playing nearly every snap wore them down
I am very optimistic that Willis can rotate in at both LDE and RDE, while Lawson will largely be off the right edge. MJ can stuff the run pretty effectively, but I don't need to see that wide arc that takes him 10 yards upfield with no "pressure" in sight. The blind side end MUST be a more effective pass rusher.
I have to throw it in....sorry, but I would love to see "my guy" Fej on a couple safety blitzes.
Posts: 25,844
Threads: 650
Reputation:
243245
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(06-24-2017, 10:20 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Thank you. When you watched the games, you didn't see much pressure when it was really needed from just the front four. That was the result of a number of things:
MJ largely ineffective as a pass rusher
Billings injury led to Peko playing 90% of snaps
LBs couldn't cover, leading to easy check downs
Dunlap and Atkins playing nearly every snap wore them down
I am very optimistic that Willis can rotate in at both LDE and RDE, while Lawson will largely be off the right edge. MJ can stuff the run pretty effectively, but I don't need to see that wide arc that takes him 10 yards upfield with no "pressure" in sight. The blind side end MUST be a more effective pass rusher.
I have to throw it in....sorry, but I would love to see "my guy" Fej on a couple safety blitzes.
Yes, they need to get off the field, on 3rd and medium. QBs making those check down throws makes for a long, tiring day for the defense, particularly when there aren't enough effective backups to rotate in. Also, I would add that they need to keep things more "vanilla" on 1st and 2nd down, and just execute well in base. Showing too much of a defense's package stuff, on 1st and 2nd downs makes it easy for the opposing OL to know what to expect in critical downs.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 2,481
Threads: 27
Reputation:
19395
Joined: May 2015
(06-23-2017, 07:07 PM)Dr. Bombay Wrote: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2017/defense-and-pass-pressure-2016
First of all they point out that even though sacks are big, pressuring a QB without getting a sack is also very important to a defense. QBs under pressure average 2 yards less per attempt, had their completion percentage drop by almost 25 points, and see their TD to INT ration cut in half.
The Bengals were able to generate "pressure plays" on 30.8% of opponents pass plays. That ranked 6th in the league, but was not that far behind the #1 Bronco's 32.2%. The Colts were last in the league with only 19.0%.
Next the looked at the teams' defensive efficiency (DVOA) "with pressure" compared to "without pressure". The bigger the difference the more a teams pass defense depends on the pass rush. The bengals ranked 18th in DVOA difference which means they are pretty much average.
Finally they ranked each teams "Pressure percentage" based on the number of rushers. They broke it down into 3 catagories "Three or fewer", "four", and "five or more". The Bengals were the second best team in the league in getting pressure with 3 or fewer, seventh when rushing 4, and fourth when rushing 5 or more. The Panthers and eagles were the only other teams to rank in the top 10 in all three catagories. But these numbers might be a little misleading. For example the Eagles were #1 in pressure percentage while rushing 3 or fewer with an incredible 77.8%, but they only rushed 3 or fewer a total of nine plays all year. So take these numbers with a grain of salt.
Interesting stats. And I think they will improve this year. I think we'll end up getting more pressure of the right edge and the in the middle.
Posts: 14,292
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31588
Joined: May 2015
Interesting, but I'm still not convinced our rookies will have a significant impact the first year the way they're being talked up. Maybe I'll get surprised and they'll come on like gangbusters, but we've seen this movie many times before and the most unlikely guy always gets the girl while everyone else ends up playing with themselves.. It's written in the script.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 11,044
Threads: 38
Reputation:
48466
Joined: May 2015
(06-23-2017, 07:07 PM)Dr. Bombay Wrote: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2017/defense-and-pass-pressure-2016
First of all they point out that even though sacks are big, pressuring a QB without getting a sack is also very important to a defense. QBs under pressure average 2 yards less per attempt, had their completion percentage drop by almost 25 points, and see their TD to INT ration cut in half.
The Bengals were able to generate "pressure plays" on 30.8% of opponents pass plays. That ranked 6th in the league, but was not that far behind the #1 Bronco's 32.2%. The Colts were last in the league with only 19.0%.
Next the looked at the teams' defensive efficiency (DVOA) "with pressure" compared to "without pressure". The bigger the difference the more a teams pass defense depends on the pass rush. The bengals ranked 18th in DVOA difference which means they are pretty much average.
Finally they ranked each teams "Pressure percentage" based on the number of rushers. They broke it down into 3 catagories "Three or fewer", "four", and "five or more". The Bengals were the second best team in the league in getting pressure with 3 or fewer, seventh when rushing 4, and fourth when rushing 5 or more. The Panthers and eagles were the only other teams to rank in the top 10 in all three catagories. But these numbers might be a little misleading. For example the Eagles were #1 in pressure percentage while rushing 3 or fewer with an incredible 77.8%, but they only rushed 3 or fewer a total of nine plays all year. So take these numbers with a grain of salt.
It's like the ghost of fredtoast past . . .
Posts: 726
Threads: 7
Reputation:
3368
Joined: May 2015
Was Fred banned or something? Because this literally reads exactly like a Fred post. Haven't been on in a minute...
Anyways our pass rush was never the worst but it was still clear pressure came from Dunlap and Atkins alone, and when they were out of the rotation the team striggled togenerate anything
Posts: 7,773
Threads: 216
Reputation:
40871
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cave
I think this year the Bengals defense is going to be downright scary with the addition of Carl Larsson and Willis
Posts: 11,044
Threads: 38
Reputation:
48466
Joined: May 2015
(06-25-2017, 04:07 AM)eoxyod Wrote: Was Fred banned or something? Because this literally reads exactly like a Fred post. Haven't been on in a minute...
Anyways our pass rush was never the worst but it was still clear pressure came from Dunlap and Atkins alone, and when they were out of the rotation the team striggled togenerate anything
Him and the alias he rode in on.
Posts: 38,655
Threads: 914
Reputation:
130614
Joined: May 2015
(06-25-2017, 04:07 AM)eoxyod Wrote: Was Fred banned or something? Because this literally reads exactly like a Fred post. Haven't been on in a minute...
It is a sad state of affairs.
|