Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:16 PM)muskiesfan Wrote: So I guess I'm going with 9-7. I really think 7-9, but the remaining schedule doesn't look that bad.
7-9 is about where I see it.
(10-29-2017, 08:39 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: While there are a bunch of below average teams on the schedule that look winnable...we could also lose to any of those teams except the Browns most likely.
I think the Bears have a powerful run game that will give us trouble for instance.
Jags and Bears both scare me. Teams that run extremely well and use their QB sparsely. Probably a lot of play action. That's how we've been killed in every playoff game. The Steelers routinely beat us by running it down our throats then throwing it over the top. We could win or lose any game on the schedule other than Steelers (auto L) and Browns (auto W).
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 973
Threads: 4
Reputation:
1147
Joined: Jan 2016
(10-29-2017, 08:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So we're at 3-4 and here's our remaining schedule:
@ Jaguars
@ Titans
@ Broncos
vs Browns
vs Steelers
vs Bears
@ Vikings
vs Lions
@ Ravens
Post your predictions.
L, W, L, W, L, L, L, W, L. Final record 6-10.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 23
Reputation:
3778
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:16 PM)muskiesfan Wrote: So I guess I'm going with 9-7. I really think 7-9, but the remaining schedule doesn't look that bad.
The Colts were one of the "easier" wins on paper too. The B's didn't even cover the spread.
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 23
Reputation:
3778
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:35 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Canned and replaced with the best available candidate. Replaced with Marv 2.0 is meaningless .
Wow! That's a nightmare scenario for sure. And, I bet it comes true.
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So we're at 3-4 and here's our remaining schedule:
@ Jaguars
@ Titans
@ Broncos
vs Browns
vs Steelers
vs Bears
@ Vikings
vs Lions
@ Ravens
Post your predictions.
Besides the Browns, there are no wins on that schedule. 4-12 it is.
Posts: 3,520
Threads: 239
Reputation:
27105
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So we're at 3-4 and here's our remaining schedule:
@ Jaguars
@ Titans
@ Broncos
vs Browns
vs Steelers
vs Bears
@ Vikings
vs Lions
@ Ravens
Post your predictions.
6-10 and good enough of a record to extend Marvins contract for 2 years...
Posts: 2,642
Threads: 228
Reputation:
7654
Joined: Jul 2015
We win the next 2 which I think we will. That should set us up for a run. I'm most concerned about broncos even more than the Steelers based on the speed of Broncos defense i don't see how we score. I will be extremely concerned about vikings if Bridgewater
is playing because mobile QB's give our d fits. My head says 8 -8 my heart says 11 -5
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 09:06 PM)GodFather Wrote: 6-10 and good enough of a record to extend Marvins contract for 2 years...
Dead cat bounce?
I'm sure ol' Hobspin will spin a masterpiece about Eifert's injury, Burfict's suspension and a young o-line that needed time to gel.
He'll probably also mention all the close losses (GB and Houston so far). Oh, and the transition from Zampese to Lazor.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(10-29-2017, 09:12 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Dead cat bounce?
I'm sure ol' Hobspin will spin a masterpiece about Eifert's injury, Burfict's suspension and a young o-line that needed time to gel.
He'll probably also mention all the close losses (GB and Houston so far). Oh, and the transition from Zampese to Lazor.
The good ol' "The OL needs time to gel while rotating tackles" excuse. Brilliant.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 09:17 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: The good ol' "The OL needs time to gel while rotating tackles" excuse. Brilliant.
Did they use that one after 2008 or 2010? Heck, maybe he used that one after 2016. I don't read bengals.com garbage anymore.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(10-29-2017, 09:38 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Did they use that one after 2008 or 2010? Heck, maybe he used that one after 2016. I don't read bengals.com garbage anymore.
I think they went "Injuries" on those seasons.
I honestly cant help but laugh at all the OL issues and they keep rotating as if it's getting better but it's actually getting worse just split 3 ways instead of 2.
Posts: 8,493
Threads: 28
Reputation:
96595
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 08:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So we're at 3-4 and here's our remaining schedule:
@ Jaguars...Loss
@ Titans......Win
@ Broncos...Loss
vs Browns....Win
vs Steelers....Win
vs Bears.........Win
@ Vikings......Loss
vs Lions.........Loss
@ Ravens......Win
Post your predictions.
8-8
Which would be remarkable with this OL
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !
Posts: 236
Threads: 1
Reputation:
586
Joined: May 2015
Seems like it will be getting more and more tougher as season goes on!
Happy Halloween
Posts: 3,520
Threads: 239
Reputation:
27105
Joined: May 2015
(10-29-2017, 09:12 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Dead cat bounce?
I'm sure ol' Hobspin will spin a masterpiece about Eifert's injury, Burfict's suspension and a young o-line that needed time to gel.
He'll probably also mention all the close losses (GB and Houston so far). Oh, and the transition from Zampese to Lazor all while bending over and thanking Mike and asking for another.
Fixed it for you...
Posts: 1,578
Threads: 13
Reputation:
7867
Joined: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 28,776
Threads: 40
Reputation:
127065
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
@ Jaguars = L
@ Titans = W
@ Broncos = L
vs Browns = W
vs Steelers = L
vs Bears = W
@ Vikings = L
vs Lions = L
@ Ravens = W
7-9, here we come. Marvin has some good things to build upon, gets one year extension. Sigh.
Posts: 4,746
Threads: 699
Reputation:
8770
Joined: May 2015
Location: Springfield, Ohio
(10-29-2017, 08:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So we're at 3-4 and here's our remaining schedule:
@ Jaguars - Win 24-20
@ Titans - Win 27-23
@ Broncos Win 20-14
vs Browns Win 35-13
vs Steelers Win - 17-14
vs Bears Win 17-10
@ Vikings Loss - 27-20
vs Lions Win - 33-30
@ Ravens Win - 27-14
Post your predictions.
Our final record will be 11-5
Posts: 18,692
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119338
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
4-12 at worst (beat Browns), 7-9 at best (beat Titans, Browns, Bears, Ravens).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 19,659
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85339
Joined: Oct 2016
(10-29-2017, 09:12 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Dead cat bounce?
I'm sure ol' Hobspin will spin a masterpiece about Eifert's injury, Burfict's suspension and a young o-line that needed time to gel.
He'll probably also mention all the close losses (GB and Houston so far). Oh, and the transition from Zampese to Lazor.
Yep. The reality is that every team in the NFL has injuries to key players. Also every team has close losses.
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29892
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
I am going to say 9-7
Wins- Jags, Titans, Bears, Lions, Steelers
losses-Broncos, Browns, Vikings
I still believe in the Defense and they will play a lot better. Also I think the Jags and Titans are way overrated and the Bengals will win close hard games. Browns upset us but we upset the Steelers . We miss the playoffs by one game.
|