Posts: 3,072
Threads: 246
Reputation:
3755
Joined: Apr 2016
One thing of note is how we always complained how these other ones were completely unrealistic. I love the draft networks(except for no trades) but it tends to go a little the other way and too tough. That said here's my first one complain about it. I couldn't not take Butler there and if green gets hurt gives us a legitimate weapon.
11
Chris Lindstrom
, IOL
42
Devin Bush Jr.
, LB
72
Hakeem Butler
, WR
104
Kaleb McGary
, OT
139
Tyree Jackson
, QB
170
Isaiah Prince
, OT
185
Lukas Denis
, S
201
Andrew Beck
, TE
Posts: 3,654
Threads: 41
Reputation:
14828
Joined: May 2015
I'm not sure if I'm reading the formatting correctly. Is Lindstrom your pick at #11?
Posts: 285
Threads: 3
Reputation:
2023
Joined: Aug 2015
I don't usually disagree with your takes, but Lindstrom at 11 is so early imo.
Posts: 3,654
Threads: 41
Reputation:
14828
Joined: May 2015
He's nowhere near the top OG in the class. If you take one at #11, it better be the best one.
Posts: 2,235
Threads: 69
Reputation:
11279
Joined: Mar 2017
Location: Alexandria, KY
(03-01-2019, 11:08 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Umm, in every single mock on some specific website? Because Peter Schrager just released his mock yesterday and Lindstrom is not in the first round.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001019166/article/peter-schrager-2019-nfl-mock-draft-10-kyler-murray-goes-no-1
Also, I don't know which mocks you've been looking at, but I've not seen Lindstrom mocked in the first in any mock that I've seen up to this point.
Beat me to it. Late second/Early third.
"Whose kitty litter did I just s*** in?"
"He got Ajax from the dish soap!"