Posts: 14,736
Threads: 2,123
Reputation:
82940
Joined: May 2015
The QB press availability at the combine is Tues from 8AM to 11AM. We are practically guaranteed for the first question to Joe being “will he play for the Bengals if picked”. With any luck the response will be an unequivocal “of course what a ridiculous question”. If there is ANY ambiguity we are in for an even bigger onslaught of negative press
Winning makes believers of us all
Posts: 2,279
Threads: 15
Reputation:
9185
Joined: Apr 2017
Plan for ambiguity. QBs arent supposed to be controversial and he really hasnt been.
Posts: 8,131
Threads: 130
Reputation:
53461
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 11,618
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
Buckle up, Burrow just measured with 9 inch hands and that will now be the next pointless fact people go to on why the Bengals should consider trading him.
Posts: 4,361
Threads: 26
Reputation:
19347
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lake Placid, NY
(02-24-2020, 10:16 AM)Au165 Wrote: Buckle up, Burrow just measured with 9 inch hands and that will now be the next pointless fact people go to on why the Bengals should consider trading him.
Is that too small?
Posts: 11,618
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 10:41 AM)Pat5775 Wrote: Is that too small?
9 inches is the absolute bottom of the normal check box hand size. The belief is smaller hands lead to more fumbles, but that falls in line with other historical check boxes like QB height and Tackle arm length that I look at as lazy scouting tools.
Posts: 2,726
Threads: 48
Reputation:
18311
Joined: May 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
(02-24-2020, 10:46 AM)Au165 Wrote: 9 inches is the absolute bottom of the normal check box hand size. The belief is smaller hands lead to more fumbles, but that falls in line with other historical check boxes like QB height and Tackle arm length that I look at as lazy scouting tools.
That and grip, especially in cold weather. It's a half inch below what they'd normally like to see from a QB, so it's not something I'm using as a "red flag".
Posts: 102
Threads: 0
Reputation:
914
Joined: Sep 2016
I just heard from an anonymous AFC scout that said it looked like Joe Burrow did not fully extend his hand on the ruler, which makes him think that he is sabotaging his first overall pick status to avoid being picked by the Cincinnati Bengals. That same scout said he might not have put his heels against the wall for the height measurement to make himself seem shorter as well.
See, I can make up news too. Maybe I can make my own football website.
2
Posts: 13,650
Threads: 366
Reputation:
45944
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 10:16 AM)Au165 Wrote: Buckle up, Burrow just measured with 9 inch hands and that will now be the next pointless fact people go to on why the Bengals should consider trading him.
That's not pointless. Not for Qb's and wideouts.
Strip sacks will be an issue as drops tend to be issues for wideouts with small hands.
More of a reason he'll have to have solid protection.
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 7,067
Threads: 55
Reputation:
97043
Joined: May 2015
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
(02-24-2020, 11:01 AM)jj22 Wrote: That's not pointless. Not for Qb's and wideouts.
Strip sacks will be an issue as drops tend to be issues for wideouts with small hands.
More of a reason he'll have to have solid protection.
For the love of God, just stop it
Posts: 11,618
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 11:01 AM)jj22 Wrote: That's not pointless. Not for Qb's and wideouts.
Strip sacks will be an issue as drops tend to be issues for wideouts with small hands.
More of a reason he'll have to have solid protection.
Again, pointless mark that is a relic of old school number over player scouting. Strip sacks weren't an issue this year as he was sacked 34 times and hit often, you don't magically develop a fumbling issue it arises more from how you hold the ball in the pocket and how you feel pressure. He is fine at both of those points.
Posts: 14,736
Threads: 2,123
Reputation:
82940
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 10:16 AM)Au165 Wrote: Buckle up, Burrow just measured with 9 inch hands and that will now be the next pointless fact people go to on why the Bengals should consider trading him.
Tua measured 9 7/8ths
Winning makes believers of us all
Posts: 11,618
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 11:20 AM)pally Wrote: Tua measured 9 7/8ths
And he measured 6 ft even which, similar to 9 inch hands, is the bottom of the barrel height a QB can be. This is the time of year where scouts and teams like to overthink things.
Posts: 13,650
Threads: 366
Reputation:
45944
Joined: May 2015
Whatever. If Burrow came in with 10 inch hands and Tua with 9 folks would "somehow" see what I'm saying. As they pointed to hand size as it relates to QB's etc.
But since he didn't. No one seems to know what I'm talking about. Funny how that works.
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 11,618
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(02-24-2020, 11:25 AM)jj22 Wrote: Whatever. If Burrow came in with 10 inch hands and Tua with 9 folks would "somehow" see what I'm saying. As they pointed to hand size and fumbles etc.
But since he didn't. No one seems to know what I'm talking about. Funny how that works.
I have held for multiple years on the draft board that these measurable are pointless, this is nothing new because it's Burrow. I said it last year with Murray's height and questions about his hand size going into the combine as well as arm length of tackles. You scout the player you don't scout the charts.
Posts: 13,650
Threads: 366
Reputation:
45944
Joined: May 2015
I think measurements mean something. It shouldn't dictate the total evaluation, but it certainly plays a part of it. It would be neglectful if ignored.
Sure slow wideouts for example have been successful, but I don't ignore 40 times. 40 times aren't everything in the evaluation process, as fast wideouts have failed too. But I think you do take it all in when evaluating a prospect.
Now folks are too defensive with Burrow and so they don't like what I said, but Burrow is my pick and his hand size doesn't change that. But we'd all have liked to see them come in at a better number. And while folks won't admit it, it's all because of what I said people like to see qb's have bigger hands for.
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 140
Threads: 4
Reputation:
1323
Joined: Jun 2015
I heard Chase Young's hands measured in at 36 inches and his height was 6 Foot 30....
Posts: 7,828
Threads: 281
Reputation:
31873
Joined: May 2015
Here is an article about hand size written by someone who appears to have been taking a prob and stats course.
https://www.dawgsbynature.com/2016/3/4/11161580/quarterback-hand-size-a-statistical-cautionary-tale
I would like to see his theory with updated data.
Posts: 4,542
Threads: 204
Reputation:
43688
Joined: May 2015
Apparently the hand size is not an issue if he signs here. According to an anonymous team source there is already plan in place.
Jerome Simpson has been offered a position with the team, contingent on being a "hand donor" for Joe Burrow.
The procedure is not a full transplant. But, basically, because of his enormous hands, Simpson got a lot to spare.
They will graft about 15% of Jerome's hands on to Joe's. It's a revolutionary procedure. Recovery time is expected to be 14 weeks, which should put Joe's return just in time for the preseason.
Posts: 3,706
Threads: 23
Reputation:
17434
Joined: May 2015
Fumbles weren't an issue for him at LSU so I'm not concerned.
Everything in this post is my fault.
|